Vitiating Factors: Misrepresentation Flashcards
What is misrepresentation?
A vitiating factor which makes a contract voidable if a false statement of fact was made by a party to the contract that induces the other party to enter the contract
What does the case SPICE GIRLS LTD V APRILIA WORLD SERVICE say about how a false statement can be made?
The statement can be verbal, written or by conduct
Why is silence insufficient for misrepresentation?
Because of the caveat emptor principle
What is the caveat emptor principle?
Let the buyer beware
What does the case GORDON V SELICO say about when silence may amount to misrepresentation?
Taking active steps to conceal a defect may amount to misrepresentation
What does the case DIMMOCK V HALLET say about when silence may amount to misrepresentation?
It is a misrepresentation to make a half truth
What does the case SPICE GIRLS V APRILIA WORLD SERVICES say about when silence may amount to misrepresentation?
Where a truthful statement of fact is made, but becomes misleading by a change of circumstances before the contract is made, there is a duty to correct what has become a false impression
What does the case TATE V WILLIAMSON say about when silence may amount to misrepresentation?
Where the relationship between parties is based on trust then silence may be a misrepresentation
What is the final instance where silence may amount to misrepresentation?
Where the contract is a contract of ‘utmost good faith’ then all material facts must be described whether asked or not
What does the case BISSETT V WILKINSON say about a statement of fact?
A statement of opinion which is honestly held by the statement maker but which proves to be false is insufficient
What does the case SMITH V LAND AND HOUSE PROPERTY CORPORATION say about a statement of fact?
Where the statement maker is in a good position to know the truth they are representing that they have reasonable grounds for making their statement and thus making a statement of fact, if the statement turns out to be false there will be a misrepresentation
What does the case EDGINGTON V FITZMAURICE say about a statement of fact?
A statement of intention will amount to a statement of fact if the statement maker has no intention of carrying it out as he is then misrepresenting the fact that he possesses the intention
Who must the false statement of fact be made by?
The representor or representee
What are the four factors that must be satisfied to prove the statement induced the other party to enter the contract?
- it must positively influence a reasonable person to enter the contract
- it must be known to the party who is considering entering the contract
- it must be intended by its maker to be acted upon by the person entering the contract
- it must actually be acted upon
What does the case ATTWOOD V SMALL say about the statement inducing the other party?
If the party entering the contract decides not to rely on the misrepresentation but check the truth of a statement by making their own investigations then there is no misrepresentation