Visuoconstructive Functioning Flashcards

1
Q

Visual Agnosia

A

Inability to recognize familiar objects not related to loss of visual acuity – familiar objects can be seen but not recognized

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Prosopagnosia

A

special case of agnosia in which recognition deficits specific to faces

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Object Vision Pathway

A

VENTRAL; primary visual cortex; secondary visual cortex; inferior longitudinal fasciculus; posterior inferotemporal cortex

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Spatial Vision Pathway

A

DORSAL; superior longitudinal fasciculus;; posterior parietal lobe

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Temporal route

A

important for recognizing objects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Parietal route

A

important for spatial location of objects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Monkey Double Dissociation

A

temporal lobe- impaired time in object discrimination but could do the spatial task
parietal lobe- could not do spatial task as quickly but could do object recognition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Methods of Monkey Double Dissociation?

A

Monkeys had to either learn to choose an unfamiliar object or choose object nearest a “landmark”–> removed parts of brain in either temporal or parietal lobe–> dictated the difficulties in performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Parietal lobe neurons

A

60% of neurons are responsive to peripheral (non-foveal) parts of visual field–> spatial location

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Temporal lobe neurons

A

receptive field always includes fovea; differential sensitivity to various objects; 41% excited by various stimuli, 59% demonstrated selectivity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How are objects defined?

A

object constancy; color & texture; variability in sensory information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

object constancy

A

recognize objects in infinite orientations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

color & texture

A

even when inappropriate, still able to recognize things

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

variability in sensory information

A

viewing position; distance from retina (size constancy even though they appear different sizes bc of distance); rarely seen in isolation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Viewer centered recognition

A

perception depends on recognizing objects from a variety of perspectives: stored representations for each perspective, match templates in memory to stimulus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Problems with viewer centered recognition

A

need template for each object, need multiple templates for each object, driven by a single cell (grandmother cells &; gnostic units), loss of cell, novel objects

17
Q

grandmother cells

A

coined to convey the notion that recognition arises from the activation of neurons that are finely tuned to specific stimuli

18
Q

gnostic unit

A

type of neuron that can recognize a complex object (Greek “of knowledge”), cell (or cells) signal the presence of a known stimulus

19
Q

object-centered recognition

A

sensory input gives basic properties: objects defined on relationship among basic properties; major/minor axis

20
Q

object-centered recognition occurs by parts

A

basic building blocks analyzed; ensemble hypothesis says recognition results from specific combination of core features; explains confusion of visually similar objects; allows for recognition of novel objects

21
Q

geons

A

attempts to try and define building blocks

22
Q

apperceptive visual agnosia

A

failure in object recognition with basic visual functions (acuity, color, motion) preserved; difficulty with copying; deficits in object constancy;

23
Q

how to test for apperceptive visual agnosia?

A

unusual views test; incomplete figures test—> difficulty with perceptual categorization, thus cannot recognize from usual views based on constancy

24
Q

associative agnosia

A

not attributed to perceptual difficulties; can copy & perform subtle shape discriminations; can perform unusual views test; still can’t name it

25
Q

Warrington Model

A

left hemisphere systems: semantic categorization & visual analysis; right hemisphere systems: perceptual categorization & visual analysis

26
Q

lesion in left-hemisphere causes?

A

associative agnosia

27
Q

lesion in right-hemisphere causes?

A

apperceptive agnosia

28
Q

problem with warrington model

A

fails to capture difficulty with integration

29
Q

integrative agnosia

A

to recognize objects, individuals examine each piece in isolation and put together; appears to be a core deficit underlying many agnosias

30
Q

Behrmann et al 2006

A

These results
suggest that encoding the spatial arrangements of parts of an object requires a mechanism that is different
from that required for encoding the shape of individual parts, with the former selectively compromised in integrative agnosia

31
Q

prosopagnosia

A

isolated deficits in facial recognition

32
Q

damage causing prosopagnosia

A

most frequent following bilateral lesions; possible following right lesions; rare following left lesions; tend to be focused in occipital temporal regions