Visualisation and Navigation in Trauma & Orthopedic Surgery Flashcards

1
Q

Why Navigation / Robots?

A

combine preoperative data to operation room

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

objectives of Image-based Intraoperativ Navigations Systems

A

Therapeutic Object (Patient)
Virtual Object (CT data,…)
Navigation System

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

classification of Image-based Intraoperativ Navigations Systems

A

Passive Systems
Semiactive Systems
Active Systems

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

aims of Image-based Intraoperativ Navigations Systems

A

Improvement of accuracy (ONLY THIS IS ACHIEVED IN PRACTICE)
Reduction of operation trauma
Reduction of operation time
Reduction of complications during operation
Improvement of long-term results (WE HAVE TO WAIT)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Problems of Image-based Intraoperativ Navigations Systems

A

Sterility
Human – Machine Interaction
Eye – Hand Coordination

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

most common navigation systems

A

C-Arm based Navigation
C-Arm and CT/MRI based

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

the most important tool for intraoperative visualization:

A

mobile C-arm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Why a mobile C-arm is preferred?

A

to find a target
to control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

method or steps of navigation system with calibrated C-Arm

A
  1. step
    - reference system
  2. step
    - 2 fluoro frames from
    different angles
  3. step
    - planning two circles
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

advantages of CT over C-arm

A

better image quality
lower dose of radiation
(disadvantage: registration needed)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

is sonography feasible for navigation? Why

A

No.
Ultrasound image is not easy to segment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

problems of MRI based Navigation

A
  • Segmentation
  • Matching
  • Modality based distortion (higher tesla produces more distortion)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

why it is difficult to segment mri data

A

tissue intensities, non-uniformity (bias), noise artifacts, and partial volume effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Pros of visualization and navigation

A

Visualization
* multiplanar
* flexible directions of view (e.g. operative view)
* Improved clarity (e.g. after colorful segmentation of a tumor including vessels/nervs)

Data Fusion
* information increase due to multimodal
imaging
* integration of functional findings
(statements)

Virtual 3D Modeling
- optimal spatial representation
- biomechanical evaluation
- optimized 3D planning
- check of contact, osteosysthesis
planning etc. …

Planning
- preop feasibility check
- virtual positioning of the implant
- optimized choose of implant

Accuracy
- exact intraoperative realization
- reproducibility (scientific studies)
- complication reduction
- biomech. optimization of implantat position
- influence on long-term results?!

Minimal Invasive
- small incisions
- transdermal methods
- minimal WT-mobilization
- minimal wound surface
- complication reduction

Documentation
- Preoperative planning documents
- intra- & postoperative documents (e.g.
screen shots of operation steps)
- quality management

Radiation Reduction
- for OR staff
- for patients

Tool for Education
- improved training through virtual
simulations (e.g. pedicular srew
postitioning, planning, in vitro OR etc.)
- extended intraoperative examination

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Future pros of visualization and navigation

A
  • biomechanical modeling
  • collision animation
  • telemedicine
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

ons of visualization

A

Training Curve
- new „tools“
- „2 level“ surgery (virtual - real) - conventional OR-equipment essential (malfunction, plausibility)

Extra OR Time
- increased blood loss
- increased inflammation risk
- Increased thrombosis rate

No Haptic Feedback
- tissue properties not taken into account with active robotics
- bone quality by nail implant
- pedicular drilling

Tool Limitations
- minimal milling head diameter for
HTEP with active robots
- limited prosthesis design

Bigger Incisions
- e.g. robot need linearer access to femur
diaphysis
- increased muscle debonding/ablation
- higher incidence of muscle insufficiencies

Increased Radiation Exposure
- for patients: often preoperative CT nessecary
- additional examinations: PET, SPECT

Psychology
- uncritical/blind trust
- „operating virtual image“

  • required space in OR
  • Sterility
  • Security
  • Costs