vision Flashcards

1
Q

famous neurological case studies

A
  • Patient Tan for language
  • Patient P.G. for Vision (see later)
  • Patient H.M. for Memory (covered during the memory lectures)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

case reports

A
  • Very important and critical task
  • Often performed by a neurologist
  • Neurologists will provide a full clinical assessment:
  • Neuropsychological nature: psychomotor speed, attention, memory, executive and visuospatial functions
  • Motor symptoms severity
  • Functional status
  • Understand comorbidity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

visual agnosia

A

a condition in which a person can see but cannot recognize or interpret visual information, due to a disorder in the parietal lobes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Neuropsychological Patient Profile: IES

A

75 year old male with bilateral posterior lesions following a CVA (Cerebrovascular accident).
Scans revealed bilateral PCA stroke involving the ventral occipital lobes including the fusiform and lingual gyrus on the left and fusiform gyrus on the right. There was also damage to the left hippocampus and primary visual cortex.
Clinical diagnosis of visual object agnosia and prosopagnosia without alexia.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

achromatopsia

A

(colour blindness) - No language comprehension or production problems, No loss of semantic knowledge -Upper right quadrant visual field cut (visual field loss).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

blindsight

A
  • Impairment to conscious visual experience of stimulus in part of visual field
  • Hemianopias
  • loss of vision to the left or right side of fixation
  • Due to damage in the visual cortex (not the eye itself)
  • Blindsight = some patients can respond to stimuli in ‘blind’ part of visual field under certain conditions, even though consciously they do not see anything!
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

blindsight (cortical blindness)

A

Persaud and Cowey (2008)
• Patient GY presented with an object in upper or lower part of his “blind” visual field. He had to point to the “opposite” location of object
• They found:
• When in blind area – he responded above chance to the real location of the object
• While being able to do the task fine when in “good” visual field

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Agnosia

A

“Agnosia refers to the inability to recognize people or objects even when basic sensory modalities are intact.”
• Visual agnosia where the person has difficultly recognizing objects, faces and/or words
• Auditory Agnosia which involves the inability to recognize sounds
• Somatosensory Agnosia where the person has difficulty perceiving objects through tactile stimulation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

visual agnosia

A
  • A deficit in processing that is restricted to the visual input modality
  • Patients may show impaired object recognition with or without Impaired face (proposopagnosia) and/or reading (alexia).
  • Lissauer (1890) distinguished between ‘apperceptive’, ‘associative’ and ‘integrative’ visual agnosia
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

apperceptive agnosia

A

is a failure in recognition that is due to a failure of perception.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

associative agnosia

A

is a type of agnosia where perception occurs but recognition still does not occur

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

intergrative

A

is a disorder in which the patient has symptoms of both apperceptive agnosia and associative agnosia, although their primary visual abilities are intact

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Visual Agnosia patients can still do some startling things…

A

 Milner et al (1991)
 Patient DF could not identify shapes – Did this effect her movements?
 Post card experiment, 2 tasks:
 Matching: turn card to match the orientation of the slot
 Posting: reach out and “post” the card into the slot

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

goodale et al 1991

A

 When asked to distinguish blocks perceptually – DF couldn’t do it
 When asked to pick the blocks up – she changed the aperture of grip to match the size of the block automatically without problems
 But when asked to estimate block size using thumb and forefinger – DF couldn’t do it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

dorsal system

A

involved in object localisation (where system)

 Acts in real time
 Guides actions
 Enables smooth and effective movement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

ventral system

A

involved in object identification (what system)

 An abstract representation of the world
 Can be stored for future reference
 This enables us to organise the information in the world
 It also enables us to plan future actions

17
Q

evidence from lesions with monkeys

A

 Lesions of the posterior parietal cortex = deficit on a spatially demanding “landmark” task but no affect on object discrimination (on basis of visual features e.g., patterns)

 Lesions of inferior temporal cortex produced deficits discriminating objects on the basis of their visual features but did not affect their performance on a the landmark task.

18
Q

where or how?

A

 Milner and Goodale (1995)
 DF has a problem in identification (What) but she can adjust her grip when picking up objects when this is automatic
 DF shown a block, asked to close eyes for 2s or 30s, then reach for it. After 30s, DFs grip is no longer adjusted accordingly. Goodale et al (1994)
 Thus “action” is a more appropriate term than “localisation” for the dorsal stream
 Is not “What Vs Where” but “What Vs How”

19
Q

other evidence for what vs how

A

 Damage early to Posterior parietal lobe
 Patient VK (Jackobson, Archibald, Carey & Goodale, 1991 )
 Can see (perceive) objects but can’t interact with them
 Kind of the opposite of visual agnosia

20
Q

optic ataxia

A

 Jakobson, Archibald, Carey & Goodale (1991)
 Optic Ataxia – difficulty grasping objects
 Good at planning the movement. So the initial movement is fine
 Problem is with the final adjustments

21
Q

visual illusions

A

Illusions can be categorised in two classes:
• Bottom-Up (physiological) Illusions - low-level physiological mechanisms
• Top-Down (cognitive) Illusions - constructivist

22
Q

Café wall illusion - Gregory & Heard (1979)

A

‘Border locking’ “Mortar” can be seen in some circumstances
But not others
Illusion – the perceptual system tries to resolve which object the mortar belongs to when white tiles meets black

23
Q

border locking

A

edge detection in the context of simultaneous spatial and colour registration in the human visual system.
If you look at the boundary between two dark tiles, the mortar line is plainly evident. At the boundary between two light tiles it can also be seen clearly.
At the boundary between a light and dark tile, however, your visual acuity simply isn’t sharp enough to resolve the mortar line as a separate object.

24
Q

photoreceptors and lateral inhibition

A

Photoreceptors (light cells) are activated when a light shines on it.
They then inhibit the firing of a adjacent cells.
Why? To maximise contrast and help in detection of contrast changes

25
Q

the herman grid

A

Why do we see the dark patches?

a. Intersection cells – more inhibition than cells elsewhere, so activate less – making this area seem darker.
b. Foveate – Cells in fovea have smaller receptive field – so illusion disappears

26
Q

illusions of contrast

A
  • Our perceptual system is interested in properties of a surface (e.g., colour) not levels of illumination (which physically influence how a surface is perceived).
  • So the perceptual system tries to factor out levels of illumination.
  • Black surround = low luminance – so perceptual system adjusts accordingly
  • Is this “bottom up”?
  • If the surround patch is black luminance, then the average brightness in the area is low, so the system adjusts accordingly making it seem like the grey
  • patch is lighter than it is.
27
Q

top down illusions

A
  • Dragon illusion (version of the hollow face illusion)
  • It appears that the dragon moves round watching us, but it is static!
  • Occurs because our brain makes inferences about the features that do not correspond to reality!
28
Q

misapplied size consistency

A

 Some evidence that people with less familiarity with corners show the effect less (Deregowski, 1972).

29
Q

size consistency

A

 Because we know that objects far away are not really smaller, we perceive them to be bigger than their retinal size

30
Q

misapplied size consistency

A

 We thus assume that the further object must be bigger than its retinal image and perceive it as bigger

31
Q

ambiguous figures

A

 Ambiguous
 2 possible interpretations
 Our perceptual system jumps between the two

32
Q

illusory figures

A

 The Kanizsa Triangle
 We perceive a white triangle that is brighter than the background but that is not really there!
 Illusory contours may be partly accounted for by low level contrast effects, partly by more cognitive processes inferring the existence of occluding objects.

33
Q

gestalt explanation

A

 Gestalt - “essence or shape of an entity’s complete form“

34
Q

reification

A

(the perception of an object as having more spatial information than is present)

 Constructive or generative aspect of perception, by which the experienced percept contains more explicit spatial information than the sensory stimulus on which it is based

35
Q

contrast illusions

A
  • What is really amazing is that, despite visual information being the same, our visual system modifies this information to provide us with an interpretation that in reality would be correct.
  • Our visual system is designed to interpret information in a way that is consistent with reality.
  • Vision isn’t about seeing light it’s about seeing things