VIII. LEGAL AND JUDICIAL ETHICS WITH PRACTICAL EXERCISES Flashcards
VIII. LEGAL AND JUDICIAL ETHICS WITH PRACTICAL EXERCISES
A. Basic Concepts on Admission to Practice
1. Supreme Court’s Administrative Supervision and Control over
Members of the Philippine Bar – 1987 CONST. art. VIII, sec. 5 (5)
Whats scope
S&C
DA
A2b
Lpo
Ppi
Rule:
Under Article VIII, Section 5 (5) of the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines, the Supreme Court exercises administrative supervision and control over members of the Philippine Bar.
Key Points:
- Supervision and Control: The Supreme Court has the authority to oversee and regulate the conduct and practice of law by members of the Philippine Bar.
- Disciplinary Authority: It holds the power to discipline lawyers for misconduct, unethical behavior, or violations of the Rules of Court.
- Admission to the Bar: The Supreme Court also has the responsibility of admitting individuals to the practice of law through the Bar examination and other qualifications.
- Legal Profession Oversight: This provision underscores the judiciary’s role in upholding the integrity of the legal profession and ensuring that lawyers adhere to the highest standards of ethics and professionalism.
- Protection of Public Interest: By exercising administrative supervision and control, the Supreme Court aims to safeguard the public interest and maintain the integrity of the legal system.
VIII. LEGAL AND JUDICIAL ETHICS WITH PRACTICAL EXERCISES
A. Basic Concepts on Admission to Practice
- Requisites for Admission to the Practice of Law
Based on the information provided in the search results, particularly [1], the key requisites for admission to the practice of law in the Philippines are:
- Non-Academic Requirements:
- Be a Filipino citizen
- Be at least 21 years old
- Be a resident of the Philippines
- Have the required moral and other non-academic qualifications - Academic Requirements:
- Obtain an undergraduate degree (with major/focus in subjects like history, economics, political science, logic, English or Spanish)
- Obtain a Juris Doctor degree (or Bachelor of Laws degree before 2019) from a law school recognized by the Secretary of Education
- Take and pass the Bar Examinations (75% general average, with no subject below 50%)
- Take the Attorney’s Oath before the Supreme Court
- Sign the Roll of Attorneys
- Remain in good standing with the Integrated Bar of the Philippines
- Continually participate in Mandatory Continuing Legal Education
Specifically, [1] states:
“To practice law in the Philippines, one must have fulfilled the non-academic and academic requirements…In terms of academic requirements, one must have obtained an undergraduate degree, has obtained a Juris Doctor degree (or Bachelor of Laws before 2019) from a law school recognized by the Secretary of Education. They must have also taken and passed (75% general average, with no subject falling below 50%) the Bar Exam, taken the Attorney’s Oath before the Supreme Court, signed the Roll of Attorneys, remain in good standing with the Integrated Bar of the Philippines, and continually participate in Mandatory Continuing Legal Education.”
So in summary, the key requisites cover citizenship, age, residency, moral fitness, academic qualifications (undergraduate, law degree, bar exam), admission procedures (oath, signing roll), and continuing legal education requirements under Philippine law and jurisprudence.
VIII. LEGAL AND JUDICIAL ETHICS WITH PRACTICAL EXERCISES
A. Basic Concepts on Admission to Practice
- The Revised Lawyer’s Oath
Based on the sources provided, the revised Lawyer’s Oath under the 2023 Rules of Court in the Philippines is as follows:
“I (name) do solemnly swear that I accept the honor, privilege, duty, and responsibility of practicing law in the Philippines as an officer of the court in the interest of our people.
I declare FEALTY to the Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines.
In doing so, I shall work towards promoting the rule of law and a regime of truth, justice, freedom, love, equality, and peace.
I shall conscientiously and courageously WORK FOR JUSTICE as well as SAFEGUARD the rights and meaningful freedoms of all persons, identities, and communities. I shall ENSURE greater and equitable access to justice.
I shall do NO FALSEHOOD, nor shall I pervert the law to unjustly favor or prejudice anyone.
I shall faithfully DISCHARGE these duties and responsibilities to the best of my ability, with integrity and utmost civility.
I impose all these upon myself without mental reservation nor purpose of evasion, so help me God.”
VIII. LEGAL AND JUDICIAL ETHICS WITH PRACTICAL EXERCISES
B. Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability (A.M. No. 22-09-01-
SC)
1. Canon 1 – Independence; Merit-Based Practice – Section 2
Key Phrases
- Independence: Free from influence
- Merit-based practice: Competence and fairness
- Impartiality: Fairness and objectivity
- Integrity: Honesty and professionalism
- Public trust: Confidence in the legal system
Rule:
In Canon 1 of the Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability (A.M. No. 22-09-01-SC), Section 2 emphasizes the principle of independence and merit-based practice among lawyers.
Key Points:
- Independence: Lawyers must maintain independence in their professional practice, free from any undue influence or interference that may compromise their integrity or impartiality.
- Merit-Based Practice: Legal services should be rendered based on merit, competence, and fairness, without regard to personal biases, prejudices, or external pressures.
- Impartiality: Lawyers are expected to uphold the rule of law and administer justice impartially, without favoritism or discrimination towards any party involved in legal proceedings.
- Integrity: This provision underscores the importance of integrity in legal practice, requiring lawyers to act honestly, ethically, and with utmost professionalism in all aspects of their work.
- Public Trust: By adhering to the principles of independence and merit-based practice, lawyers contribute to building public trust and confidence in the legal profession and the administration of justice.
VIII. LEGAL AND JUDICIAL ETHICS WITH PRACTICAL EXERCISES
B. Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability (A.M. No. 22-09-01-
SC)
- Canon 2 – Propriety
a. Proper Conduct; Dignified Conduct – Sections 1 and 2
Dignity Lp
Decorum poL
*Under Canon 2 of the Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability (A.M. No. 22-09-01-SC), Sections 1 and 2 focus on proper and dignified conduct expected from lawyers.
Key Points:
- Proper Conduct (Section 1): Lawyers are required to conduct themselves in a manner that upholds the dignity of the legal profession. They must act with honesty, fairness, and integrity in all dealings with clients, colleagues, courts, and the public.
- Dignified Conduct (Section 2): This provision emphasizes the importance of maintaining dignity and decorum in the practice of law. Lawyers should refrain from engaging in conduct that is undignified, unprofessional, or disrespectful, both inside and outside the courtroom.
- Respect for the Legal System: Lawyers are expected to show respect for the legal system and the administration of justice. They should adhere to ethical standards and uphold the principles of justice, fairness, and the rule of law in their professional conduct.
- Confidentiality: The duty of confidentiality is implicit in proper and dignified conduct. Lawyers must respect client confidentiality and safeguard privileged information obtained during the course of their legal representation.
- Professionalism: By adhering to the principles of proper and dignified conduct, lawyers contribute to fostering public trust and confidence in the legal profession, thereby upholding its reputation and integrity.
VIII. LEGAL AND JUDICIAL ETHICS WITH PRACTICAL EXERCISES
B. Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability (A.M. No. 22-09-01-
SC)
- Canon 2 – Propriety
c. Duty to correct false or inaccurate statements and information
made in relation to an application for admission to the bar –
Section 11
Key Phrases
- Professionalism: Upholding dignity and integrity.
- Dignified behavior: Respectful and decorous conduct.
- Respect for the law: Adherence to justice and fairness.
- Client confidentiality: Safeguarding privileged information.
- Public trust: Enhancing the legal profession’s reputation.
Rule:
Under Canon 2 of the Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability (A.M. No. 22-09-01-SC), Section 11 imposes a duty on lawyers to correct false or inaccurate statements and information made in relation to an application for admission to the bar.
Key Points:
- Duty to Correct False Information: Lawyers have a professional obligation to ensure the accuracy and truthfulness of information provided in their application for admission to the bar. If they become aware of any false or inaccurate statements made in the application, they must take prompt action to correct them.
- Importance of Integrity: Upholding the integrity of the legal profession is paramount. By correcting false or inaccurate information, lawyers demonstrate their commitment to honesty, transparency, and ethical conduct, which are essential qualities for admission to the bar.
- Preserving the Integrity of the Legal System: Providing accurate information in bar admission applications helps preserve the integrity of the legal system. False or misleading statements can undermine the credibility of the legal profession and erode public trust in the administration of justice.
- Professional Responsibility: Lawyers have a duty to act in the best interests of the legal profession and the public. Correcting false or inaccurate information demonstrates a lawyer’s adherence to professional standards and commitment to upholding the principles of integrity and honesty.
- Consequences of Failure to Correct: Failure to correct false or inaccurate information in a bar admission application may result in disciplinary action, including denial of admission to the bar or revocation of a lawyer’s license if discovered after admission. It is essential for lawyers to fulfill their duty to ensure the accuracy of information provided in their application materials.
VIII. LEGAL AND JUDICIAL ETHICS WITH PRACTICAL EXERCISES
B. Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability (A.M. No. 22-09-01-
SC)
- Canon 2 – Propriety
b. Use of Dignified, Gender-Fair, and Child- and Culturally-Sensitive LANGUAGE – Section 4
Key Phrases
- Respectful Communication: Dignified and inclusive language.
- Gender Equality: Language promoting gender fairness.
- Child Protection: Appropriate language for children.
- Cultural Sensitivity: Respectful language for diverse cultures.
- Professionalism: Ethical and dignified language use.
- Social Justice: Language promoting equality and fairness.
Rule:
Under Canon 2 of the Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability (A.M. No. 22-09-01-SC), Section 4 mandates the use of dignified, gender-fair, and child- and culturally-sensitive language by lawyers.
Key Points:
- Respectful Communication: Lawyers are required to communicate respectfully and professionally, using language that upholds the dignity of all individuals. This includes avoiding derogatory or discriminatory language based on gender, age, or cultural background.
- Gender Sensitivity: Lawyers must use language that promotes gender equality and avoids reinforcing stereotypes or discriminatory attitudes towards any gender. This promotes inclusivity and respect for diversity within the legal profession and society as a whole.
- Child Protection: Legal professionals should exercise caution when communicating about or with children, ensuring that language used is appropriate, non-exploitative, and sensitive to the developmental needs and vulnerabilities of minors.
- Cultural Sensitivity: Recognizing the diversity of cultures within society, lawyers should use language that is culturally sensitive and respectful of different customs, traditions, and beliefs. This fosters understanding and promotes harmonious interactions within multicultural communities.
- Professionalism and Ethics: Adhering to standards of propriety in language usage reflects a lawyer’s commitment to professionalism and ethical conduct. By using dignified, gender-fair, and culturally-sensitive language, lawyers uphold the values of integrity, respect, and fairness integral to the legal profession.
- Promotion of Social Justice: Language that is respectful and inclusive contributes to the promotion of social justice by fostering an environment where all individuals are treated with dignity and equality before the law. Lawyers play a crucial role in advancing these principles through their choice of language in legal proceedings and interactions with clients, colleagues, and the public.
VIII. LEGAL AND JUDICIAL ETHICS WITH PRACTICAL EXERCISES
B. Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability (A.M. No. 22-09-01-
SC)
- Canon 2 – Propriety
d. Duty to report dishonest, deceitful, or misleading conduct –
Section 12
Key Phrases
- Professional Duty: Upholding legal integrity.
- Public Protection: Safeguarding public trust.
- Accountability: Responsibility to the profession.
- Confidentiality Balance: Protecting client secrets vs. reporting misconduct.
- Legal Compliance: Adhering to reporting rules.
- Professional Image: Maintaining the legal profession’s reputation.
Rule:
Under Canon 2 of the Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability (A.M. No. 22-09-01-SC), Section 12 imposes a duty on lawyers to report dishonest, deceitful, or misleading conduct.
Key Points:
- Ethical Obligation: Lawyers have an ethical obligation to maintain the integrity of the legal profession and the administration of justice. This includes reporting any instances of dishonesty, deceit, or misleading conduct by fellow lawyers or members of the legal community.
- Protection of Public Interest: Reporting unethical behavior is essential for protecting the public interest and maintaining trust in the legal system. By exposing dishonest or deceitful conduct, lawyers help ensure that justice is served and that individuals receive fair and honest representation.
- Professional Accountability: Lawyers are accountable not only to their clients but also to the legal profession and society at large. Reporting misconduct demonstrates a commitment to upholding professional standards and ensuring that lawyers adhere to the principles of honesty, integrity, and transparency.
- Confidentiality Considerations: While lawyers have a duty to report misconduct, they must also be mindful of confidentiality obligations. Information obtained in the course of representing a client is generally confidential, and lawyers must exercise discretion when disclosing such information, balancing the duty to report with the duty to maintain client confidentiality.
- Legal and Regulatory Compliance: Reporting dishonest or misleading conduct may be required by law or professional regulations. Lawyers should familiarize themselves with applicable rules and procedures governing the reporting of misconduct and ensure compliance with relevant legal and ethical obligations.
- Professionalism and Trustworthiness: Upholding the duty to report misconduct contributes to the professionalism and trustworthiness of the legal profession. Clients, colleagues, and the public rely on lawyers to act with integrity and uphold ethical standards, and reporting unethical behavior is integral to maintaining the credibility and reputation of the legal profession.
VIII. LEGAL AND JUDICIAL ETHICS WITH PRACTICAL EXERCISES
B. Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability (A.M. No. 22-09-01-
SC)
- Canon 2 – Propriety
e. Duty to disclose relationship or connection – Section 20
Key Phrases
- Full Disclosure: Complete transparency.
- Impartiality: Unbiased representation.
- Informed Consent: Client’s right to know.
- Conflict Avoidance: Protecting client interests.
- Professional Integrity: Upholding ethical standards.
- Legal Compliance: Adhering to disclosure rules.
Rule:
Under Canon 2 of the Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability (A.M. No. 22-09-01-SC), Section 20 imposes a duty on lawyers to disclose any relationship or connection that may affect their impartiality or independence in representing a client.
Key Points:
- Full Disclosure: Lawyers have a duty to provide full and honest disclosure of any relationships or connections that could potentially influence their representation of a client. This includes personal, professional, or financial relationships with parties involved in the matter.
- Impartiality and Independence: The duty to disclose is rooted in the principles of impartiality and independence, which are fundamental to the lawyer-client relationship. By disclosing relevant relationships, lawyers can ensure that their representation remains free from conflicts of interest and that clients receive unbiased advice and advocacy.
- Informed Consent: Disclosure enables clients to make informed decisions about their legal representation. Clients have the right to be fully informed about any factors that may affect their case, including the lawyer’s relationships or affiliations that could impact the lawyer’s ability to act in their best interests.
- Avoidance of Conflicts of Interest: Disclosure of relationships helps prevent conflicts of interest that could undermine the lawyer’s loyalty to the client or compromise the confidentiality of the attorney-client relationship. Identifying and addressing potential conflicts at the outset allows lawyers to take appropriate measures to protect their clients’ interests.
- Professional Integrity: Upholding the duty to disclose demonstrates a commitment to professional integrity and ethical conduct. By being transparent about potential conflicts or biases, lawyers uphold the standards of the legal profession and maintain trust with their clients and the public.
- Legal and Ethical Compliance: The duty to disclose relationships is consistent with legal and ethical obligations governing lawyer conduct. Lawyers must comply with professional rules and regulations that require transparency and disclosure in matters affecting their representation of clients.
VIII. LEGAL AND JUDICIAL ETHICS WITH PRACTICAL EXERCISES
B. Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability (A.M. No. 22-09-01-
SC)
- Canon 2 – Propriety
f. Duty not to mislead the court, tribunal or other government
agency on the existence or content of any document, argument,
evidence, law, or other legal authority, or pass off as one’s own the
ideas or words of another – Section 8
Key Phrases
- Honesty and Truth: Accurate representation.
- No Deception: Avoid misleading the court.
- Legal Accuracy: Correct representation of law.
- Client Advocacy: Zealous representation within bounds.
- Openness: Forthright communication with the court.
- Professional Responsibility: Accountability for conduct.
Rule:
Under Canon 2 of the Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability (A.M. No. 22-09-01-SC), Section 8 imposes a duty on lawyers not to mislead the court, tribunal, or other government agency regarding the existence or content of any document, argument, evidence, law, or legal authority. Furthermore, lawyers are prohibited from passing off as their own the ideas or words of another.
Key Points:
- Honesty and Integrity: Lawyers have a duty to uphold honesty and integrity in their interactions with the court, tribunal, or government agency. This includes providing accurate and truthful information regarding documents, arguments, evidence, laws, or legal authorities relevant to a case.
- Avoidance of Deception: The prohibition against misleading the court or government agency aims to prevent deception or manipulation of the legal process. Lawyers must refrain from presenting false or misleading information that could influence the decision-making process or undermine the administration of justice.
- Respect for Legal Authority: Lawyers are expected to respect the authority of the court, tribunal, or government agency by accurately representing the law and legal precedents relevant to the case. Misrepresentation of legal authorities or passing off the ideas or words of others as one’s own undermines the integrity of the legal system.
- Protection of Client Interests: While advocating zealously for their clients, lawyers must do so within the bounds of ethical conduct and professional responsibility. Misleading the court or government agency not only violates ethical standards but also jeopardizes the interests of clients and the credibility of the legal profession.
- Duty of Candor: Lawyers have a duty of candor toward the tribunal, which requires them to be forthright and transparent in their communications. This duty extends to accurately representing the facts and law relevant to the case and refraining from any conduct that could mislead or deceive the court or government agency.
- Professional Accountability: Violations of Section 8 can result in disciplinary action against the lawyer, including sanctions imposed by the court or professional regulatory bodies. Upholding the duty not to mislead the court or government agency is essential for maintaining the integrity and reputation of the legal profession.
VIII. LEGAL AND JUDICIAL ETHICS WITH PRACTICAL EXERCISES
B. Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability (A.M. No. 22-09-01-
SC)
- Canon 2 – Propriety
g. Duty not to solicit or advertise one’s legal service – Section 17
Key Phrases
- No Solicitation: Lawyers cannot actively seek clients.
- Avoid Ambulance Chasing: No exploiting unfortunate situations.
- Professionalism: Upholding dignity and integrity.
- Client Autonomy: Respect for client choices.
- Fair Competition: Based on merit, not aggressive tactics.
- Limited Exceptions: Permissible advertising allowed.
Rule:
Under Canon 2 of the Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability (A.M. No. 22-09-01-SC), Section 17 imposes a duty on lawyers not to solicit or advertise their legal services.
Key Points:
- Prohibition on Solicitation: Section 17 prohibits lawyers from actively seeking clients for their legal services through solicitation. Solicitation involves directly or indirectly offering legal services to potential clients for pecuniary gain, usually through personal or written communication.
- Avoidance of Ambulance Chasing: This rule aims to prevent unethical practices such as ambulance chasing, where lawyers approach individuals who have recently experienced accidents or personal tragedies to offer legal representation. Such practices are considered exploitative and undermine the integrity of the legal profession.
- Respect for Professionalism: By refraining from solicitation, lawyers uphold the dignity and professionalism of the legal profession. Solicitation can create the perception that lawyers prioritize financial gain over ethical considerations and the best interests of their clients.
- Preservation of Client Autonomy: Solicitation may pressure individuals into making hasty decisions about legal representation without fully considering their options. Upholding the prohibition on solicitation helps preserve the autonomy of clients to choose legal representation based on informed decisions rather than aggressive marketing tactics.
- Promotion of Fair Competition: Prohibiting solicitation promotes fair competition among lawyers based on competence, reputation, and ethical conduct rather than aggressive marketing strategies. This fosters a legal environment where clients can make decisions based on the quality of legal services rather than solicitation tactics.
- Exceptions: Section 17 may have limited exceptions, such as permissible forms of advertising that are not considered solicitation, provided they comply with the guidelines set forth by the relevant regulatory authorities. However, lawyers should exercise caution to ensure that any advertising efforts remain consistent with ethical standards and do not cross into prohibited solicitation practices.
VIII. LEGAL AND JUDICIAL ETHICS WITH PRACTICAL EXERCISES
B. Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability (A.M. No. 22-09-01-
SC)
- Canon 2 – Propriety
h. Duty not to use any forum or medium to comment or publicize
opinion pertaining to a pending proceeding – Sub-Judice Rule;
Section 19
1. Protecting judicial impartiality: The Sub Judice Rule safeguards the court’s independence.
2. Preventing prejudice: Public comments can unfairly influence the case.
3. Ensuring fair trials: The rule protects the rights of all parties involved.
4. Respecting the judicial process: Lawyers must uphold the court’s authority.
5. Limited exceptions: There may be specific circumstances where comments are allowed.
Rule:
Under Canon 2 of the Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability (A.M. No. 22-09-01-SC), Section 19 imposes a duty on lawyers not to use any forum or medium to comment or publicize opinions pertaining to a pending proceeding, also known as the Sub Judice Rule.
Key Points:
- Preservation of Judicial Independence: The Sub Judice Rule aims to preserve the integrity and independence of the judiciary by preventing lawyers from making public comments or expressing opinions that may unduly influence ongoing legal proceedings. This helps maintain public confidence in the fairness and impartiality of the judicial system.
- Avoidance of Prejudice: Public commentary on pending legal cases has the potential to prejudice the minds of the public, jurors, or other parties involved in the proceedings. By refraining from making such comments, lawyers ensure that legal matters are adjudicated based on evidence and legal arguments presented in court, rather than external influences.
- Protection of Due Process: All parties to a legal proceeding are entitled to a fair and impartial trial based on the merits of their case. Public commentary that seeks to influence public opinion or sway the outcome of a case undermines the principles of due process and fairness. The Sub Judice Rule helps safeguard the due process rights of litigants by preventing extrajudicial statements that may unfairly impact the proceedings.
- Respect for Judicial Function: Lawyers play a crucial role in upholding the integrity of the legal system. By respecting the Sub Judice Rule and refraining from public commentary on pending cases, lawyers demonstrate respect for the judicial function and the authority of the courts to adjudicate legal disputes free from external interference.
- Exceptions: While the Sub Judice Rule generally prohibits lawyers from commenting on pending proceedings, there may be limited exceptions, such as statements made in the course of legal arguments or during court proceedings. However, even in such instances, lawyers must exercise caution to ensure that their statements are consistent with ethical standards and do not unduly prejudice the proceedings.
VIII. LEGAL AND JUDICIAL ETHICS WITH PRACTICAL EXERCISES
B. Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability (A.M. No. 22-09-01-
SC)
- Canon 2 – Propriety
i. Duty not to give gifts and donations to any court, tribunal or other
government agency – Section 21
- Maintaining judicial independence: Gifts or donations can compromise impartiality.
- Preventing conflicts of interest: Avoid situations that may appear improper.
- Ensuring fairness and transparency: Gifts can create the perception of preferential treatment.
- Protecting judicial integrity: Safeguard public trust in the legal system.
Rule:
Under Canon 2 of the Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability (A.M. No. 22-09-01-SC), Section 21 imposes a duty on lawyers not to give gifts and donations to any court, tribunal, or other government agency.
Key Points:
- Preservation of Judicial Independence: Prohibiting lawyers from giving gifts or donations to courts, tribunals, or government agencies helps maintain the independence and impartiality of the judiciary and other government institutions. Acceptance of gifts or donations could create the appearance of impropriety or bias, undermining public confidence in the integrity of the legal and administrative systems.
- Avoidance of Conflict of Interest: Offering gifts or donations to courts or government agencies may create a conflict of interest or the perception thereof. Lawyers have a duty to avoid situations where their actions could compromise their professional integrity or give rise to suspicions of undue influence. By refraining from giving gifts or donations, lawyers uphold the principle of impartiality and avoid any appearance of impropriety.
- Promotion of Fairness and Transparency: The legal system relies on fairness, transparency, and equal treatment under the law. Giving gifts or donations to courts or government agencies could create the perception that certain individuals or entities receive preferential treatment, potentially undermining the fairness and integrity of the legal process. By adhering to the prohibition on giving gifts and donations, lawyers contribute to the promotion of a just and equitable legal system.
- Protection of Judicial Integrity: Judicial integrity is essential for the effective functioning of the legal system and the administration of justice. Any perception of undue influence or impropriety could erode public trust in the judiciary and government institutions. By respecting the prohibition on giving gifts and donations, lawyers help safeguard the integrity and reputation of the courts and other government agencies.
- Ethical Conduct: Upholding ethical standards is fundamental to the legal profession. Lawyers have a duty to conduct themselves with honesty, integrity, and professionalism at all times. By complying with the prohibition on giving gifts and donations, lawyers demonstrate their commitment to ethical conduct and uphold the principles of fairness, impartiality, and transparency in the practice of law.
VIII. LEGAL AND JUDICIAL ETHICS WITH PRACTICAL EXERCISES
B. Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability (A.M. No. 22-09-01-
SC)
- Canon 2 – Propriety
j. Duty not to institute multiple cases; Forum Shopping – Section 23
Key Phrases
- Efficient Justice: Prevent court overload and delays.
- Fair Play: Discourage manipulative legal tactics.
- Judicial Integrity: Protect the court’s reputation.
- Respect for Court Orders: Uphold judicial authority.
- Ethical Practice: Adhere to legal and professional standards.
Rule:
Under Canon 2 of the Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability (A.M. No. 22-09-01-SC), Section 23 imposes a duty on lawyers not to institute multiple cases or engage in forum shopping.
Key Points:
- Prevention of Judicial Overload: By prohibiting lawyers from filing multiple cases on the same issue or engaging in forum shopping, Section 23 aims to prevent the judiciary from being overloaded with redundant cases. This ensures that judicial resources are efficiently utilized and that cases are resolved in a timely manner.
- Promotion of Judicial Efficiency: Forum shopping, which involves filing the same case in multiple courts or tribunals to gain a favorable outcome, undermines judicial efficiency and integrity. It leads to the waste of judicial resources and creates confusion and inconsistency in legal proceedings. Section 23 seeks to promote judicial efficiency by discouraging such practices.
- Preservation of Judicial Integrity: Engaging in forum shopping or filing multiple cases on the same issue can erode public confidence in the judiciary and the legal profession. It creates the perception that the legal process is being manipulated for personal gain or tactical advantage. Section 23 reinforces the importance of upholding the integrity and impartiality of the judicial system.
- Respect for Court Orders: By complying with Section 23, lawyers demonstrate respect for court orders and the authority of the judiciary. Filing multiple cases or engaging in forum shopping undermines the finality and authority of court decisions, as it allows litigants to circumvent unfavorable rulings by seeking a more favorable forum. Adhering to the prohibition on these practices promotes respect for the rule of law and the judicial process.
- Ethical Conduct: Upholding ethical standards is fundamental to the legal profession. Lawyers have a duty to act with honesty, integrity, and fairness in all aspects of their practice. By refraining from instituting multiple cases or engaging in forum shopping, lawyers fulfill their ethical obligation to uphold the principles of justice, fairness, and respect for the legal system.
VIII. LEGAL AND JUDICIAL ETHICS WITH PRACTICAL EXERCISES
B. Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability (A.M. No. 22-09-01-
SC)
- Canon 2 – Propriety
k. Duty not to encroach or interfere in another lawyer’s engagement
– Section 24
Key Phrases
- Professional Boundaries: Respect for colleagues’ clients.
- Client Trust: Protecting the attorney-client relationship.
- Fair Competition: Preventing unfair business practices.
- Conflict Avoidance: Maintaining professional integrity.
- Ethical Conduct: Upholding legal profession standards.
Rule:
Under Canon 2 of the Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability (A.M. No. 22-09-01-SC), Section 24 imposes a duty on lawyers not to encroach or interfere in another lawyer’s engagement.
Key Points:
- Respect for Professional Boundaries: Section 24 emphasizes the importance of respecting the professional boundaries of fellow lawyers. It prohibits lawyers from encroaching on or interfering with the legal matters or clients of another lawyer without proper authorization or consent. This rule promotes professionalism, collegiality, and mutual respect within the legal profession.
- Preservation of Client Confidence: Encroaching on another lawyer’s engagement can undermine client confidence and trust in the legal profession. Clients rely on their chosen lawyers to represent their interests competently and faithfully. Section 24 ensures that clients can trust that their lawyer will not be subject to interference or solicitation from other lawyers, thus preserving the integrity and confidentiality of the attorney-client relationship.
- Protection of Legal Practice: By prohibiting interference in another lawyer’s engagement, Section 24 helps protect the integrity and stability of legal practices. It prevents unfair competition and unethical conduct that could harm the reputation and livelihood of lawyers. Upholding this duty promotes a level playing field in the legal profession and fosters a culture of professionalism and integrity.
- Avoidance of Conflicts of Interest: Encroaching on another lawyer’s engagement may lead to conflicts of interest and ethical dilemmas. It can create situations where lawyers are pitted against each other or are forced to choose between loyalty to their client and professional courtesy to their peers. Section 24 aims to minimize such conflicts by setting clear boundaries on acceptable conduct between lawyers.
- Promotion of Ethical Conduct: Adhering to the duty not to encroach or interfere in another lawyer’s engagement reinforces the ethical standards expected of legal practitioners. It demonstrates a commitment to ethical conduct, fairness, and respect for the rights and responsibilities of fellow members of the legal profession. By upholding this duty, lawyers contribute to the maintenance of a professional and reputable legal community.
VIII. LEGAL AND JUDICIAL ETHICS WITH PRACTICAL EXERCISES
B. Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability (A.M. No. 22-09-01-
SC)
- Canon 2 – Propriety
l. Responsible Use of Social Media
- Professionalism and Integrity: Lawyers must maintain high ethical standards online and offline.
- Respect for the Legal System: Lawyers should uphold the dignity of the legal profession.
- Client Confidentiality: Lawyers must protect client information online.
- Honest Representation: Lawyers must accurately portray their qualifications and services.
- Adherence to Legal and Ethical Rules: Lawyers must follow all legal and ethical regulations online.
- Respectful Online Conduct: Lawyers should be civil and respectful in online interactions.
- Protection of Professional Reputation: Lawyers must be mindful of their online image.
Rule:
Under Canon 2 of the Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability (A.M. No. 22-09-01-SC), lawyers are expected to exercise responsible use of social media platforms.
Key Points:
- Professionalism and Integrity: Lawyers are required to maintain professionalism and integrity in all aspects of their professional and personal lives, including their use of social media. They should avoid engaging in behavior that could undermine the public’s confidence in the legal profession or reflect poorly on their character and fitness to practice law.
- Respect for Legal System: Lawyers should refrain from making derogatory or disrespectful comments about the legal system, judges, fellow lawyers, or parties involved in legal proceedings. They should uphold the dignity and respect of the legal profession and avoid behavior that could bring the profession into disrepute.
- Confidentiality and Privacy: Lawyers must be mindful of their ethical obligations regarding client confidentiality and privacy when using social media. They should refrain from disclosing confidential information or discussing client matters in a public forum, which could compromise the attorney-client privilege and breach their duty of confidentiality.
- Avoidance of Misrepresentation: Lawyers should ensure that their social media posts and interactions accurately represent their qualifications, expertise, and professional affiliations. They should refrain from making false or misleading statements that could deceive or mislead the public about their legal services or credentials.
- Compliance with Legal and Ethical Standards: Lawyers are bound by the same legal and ethical standards when using social media as they are in their offline interactions. They should comply with all applicable laws, rules, and regulations governing the practice of law and professional conduct, including those related to advertising, solicitation, and client communication.
- Civility and Decorum: Lawyers should engage in civil and respectful discourse on social media platforms, even when discussing controversial or sensitive topics. They should avoid engaging in personal attacks, harassment, or inflammatory rhetoric that could escalate conflicts or damage professional relationships.
- Awareness of Professional Reputation: Lawyers should be aware that their online activities can impact their professional reputation and credibility. They should exercise caution and good judgment when posting content or engaging in online discussions to avoid tarnishing their reputation or undermining public trust in the legal profession.
VIII. LEGAL AND JUDICIAL ETHICS WITH PRACTICAL EXERCISES
B. Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability (A.M. No. 22-09-01-
SC)
3. Canon III – Fidelity
a. Definition of the Practice of Law – Section 1
Key Points
- Lawyer’s Role: Qualified and licensed professionals.
- Legal Services: Wide range of legal activities.
- Exclusive Right: Only lawyers can practice law.
- Public Protection: Ensuring competent legal services.
- Prohibited Practice: Unauthorized practice is illegal.
- Ethical Duties: Lawyers have professional obligations.
Rule:
Canon III of the Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability (A.M. No. 22-09-01-SC) pertains to fidelity, which includes adherence to the definition of the practice of law as outlined in Section 1.
Key Points:
- Practice of Law Defined: The practice of law encompasses the rendition of legal services, including legal advice and representation, by a person who is duly qualified and licensed to practice law in the Philippines.
- Scope of Legal Services: The definition of the practice of law includes a wide range of legal activities, such as providing legal opinions, drafting legal documents, appearing in court proceedings, and representing clients in legal matters.
- Qualification and Licensure: Only individuals who have obtained the necessary qualifications and been admitted to the practice of law by the Supreme Court of the Philippines are authorized to engage in the practice of law. This typically involves graduating from an accredited law school, passing the Philippine Bar Examination, and taking the attorney’s oath.
- Exclusive Right: The practice of law is an exclusive right granted to lawyers who have met the prescribed requirements for admission to the bar. Non-lawyers are prohibited from engaging in activities that constitute the practice of law, as defined by law and jurisprudence.
- Protection of Public Interest: The definition of the practice of law is designed to protect the public interest by ensuring that legal services are provided by competent and qualified professionals who are subject to ethical standards and professional regulation.
- Unauthorized Practice Prohibited: Individuals who are not duly licensed to practice law in the Philippines are prohibited from holding themselves out as lawyers or offering legal services to the public. Unauthorized practice may constitute a criminal offense and can result in disciplinary action by the Supreme Court.
- Ethical Obligations: Lawyers have ethical obligations to their clients, the legal profession, and the administration of justice. These obligations include maintaining competence, confidentiality, and loyalty to clients, as well as upholding the integrity and dignity of the legal profession.
VIII. LEGAL AND JUDICIAL ETHICS WITH PRACTICAL EXERCISES
B. Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability (A.M. No. 22-09-01-
SC)
3. Canon III – Fidelity
b. Definition of Lawyer-Client Relationship – Section 3
Key Points of Lawyer-Client Relationship
- Trust and Confidentiality: Core of the relationship.
- Professional Duty: Competent and diligent representation.
- Mutual Respect: Foundation for effective collaboration.
- Client Autonomy: Informed decisions through disclosure.
- Open Communication: Essential for trust building.
- Conflict-Free Representation: Protecting client interests.
- Termination: Mutual right to end the relationship.
- Client Secrets: Protection of confidential information.
Rule:
Canon III of the Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability (A.M. No. 22-09-01-SC) addresses fidelity, including the definition of the lawyer-client relationship as outlined in Section 3.
Key Points:
- Confidential Relationship: The lawyer-client relationship is founded on trust and confidentiality. It involves the provision of legal services by a lawyer to a client, wherein the client confides information to the lawyer with the expectation that it will be kept confidential.
- Professional Obligations: Lawyers have a duty to provide competent and diligent representation to their clients, acting in the best interests of the client within the bounds of the law and professional ethics.
- Mutual Respect and Trust: The lawyer-client relationship is characterized by mutual respect and trust. Clients rely on their lawyers for advice, guidance, and advocacy, while lawyers owe their clients loyalty, zealous advocacy, and protection of their legal rights and interests.
- Informed Consent: Lawyers must ensure that their clients provide informed consent before undertaking legal representation. This includes explaining the nature of the legal services to be provided, the potential risks and benefits, and any alternative courses of action available to the client.
- Communication: Effective communication is essential in the lawyer-client relationship. Lawyers must keep their clients informed about the progress of their case, provide timely updates, and promptly respond to client inquiries and concerns.
- Conflict of Interest: Lawyers have a duty to avoid conflicts of interest that may compromise their ability to represent their clients effectively. They must disclose any potential conflicts and obtain informed consent from affected clients before proceeding with representation.
- Termination of Representation: Clients have the right to terminate their relationship with their lawyer at any time, subject to any applicable ethical and legal obligations. Likewise, lawyers have the right to withdraw from representation under certain circumstances, such as conflicts of interest or inability to fulfill their professional duties.
- Duty of Confidentiality: Lawyers are bound by strict rules of confidentiality regarding information obtained from their clients during the course of representation. They must not disclose confidential information without the client’s consent, except as required by law or professional ethics.
VIII. LEGAL AND JUDICIAL ETHICS WITH PRACTICAL EXERCISES
B. Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability (A.M. No. 22-09-01-
SC)
3. Canon III – Fidelity
c. Conflict of interest – Sections 13-22
-
No Representation of Conflicting Interests:
- Key Phrase: “No Conflicting Interests”
-
Written Informed Consent:
- Key Phrase: “Written Consent After Full Disclosure”
-
Definition of Conflict of Interest:
- Key Phrase: “Inconsistent or Opposing Interests”
-
Test for Conflict:
- Key Phrase: “Duty to Fight vs. Duty to Oppose”
- Fair, Disclosed, Client Consent
- Do not use Confidential Information
- Cannot acquire Gifts
- Literary or Media Rights need Consent
- Third-Party Compensation needs Consent
- Multiple Clients: Disclose Claims
- Testifying: Avoid, Except Essential
Brief Example:
Scenario: Attorney Alex is asked to represent both a landlord and a tenant in a dispute over lease terms.
- No Conflicting Interests: Alex cannot represent both parties because their interests conflict.
- Written Consent After Full Disclosure: If both the landlord and tenant agree in writing after Alex fully discloses the conflict, he may represent them.
- Inconsistent or Opposing Interests: Representing both parties would mean Alex has to support the landlord’s claim to higher rent while opposing it for the tenant.
- Duty to Fight vs. Duty to Oppose: Alex’s duty to fight for the landlord’s higher rent is directly opposed to his duty to fight for the tenant’s lower rent.
Key Points for Easy Memorization:
-
Business Transactions with Clients:
- Key Phrase: “Fair, Disclosed, Client Consent”
- Example: Lawyer must ensure terms are fair, fully disclosed, and client consents in writing.
-
Use of Confidential Information:
- Key Phrase: “No Use Without Consent”
- Example: Lawyer cannot use client’s confidential information without written consent.
-
Acquiring Gifts from Clients:
- Key Phrase: “No Undue Influence for Gifts”
- Example: Lawyer cannot acquire substantial gifts or prepare documents giving themselves gifts.
-
Literary or Media Rights:
- Key Phrase: “No Media Rights Without Consent”
- Example: Lawyer cannot negotiate for media rights based on case information without client’s consent.
-
Third-Party Compensation:
- Key Phrase: “Client Consent, No Interference”
- Example: Lawyer can accept payment from others only with client’s consent and no interference with independence.
-
Multiple Clients in Same Case:
- Key Phrase: “Disclose All Claims in Settlements”
- Example: Lawyer must inform all clients about all claims or pleas in settlements or plea bargains.
-
Testifying for Clients:
- Key Phrase: “Avoid Testifying, Except Essential”
- Example: Lawyer should avoid testifying for clients unless on formal matters or essential to justice.
Brief Examples:
-
Business Transactions with Clients:
- Scenario: Attorney John wants to invest in his client’s business. He ensures the terms are fair, fully discloses them in writing, and gets the client’s written consent.
-
Use of Confidential Information:
- Scenario: Attorney Maria cannot use confidential information from her client’s case for another purpose without getting written consent from the client.
-
Acquiring Gifts from Clients:
- Scenario: Attorney Alex cannot accept a substantial gift from a client or prepare a will making himself the beneficiary.
-
Literary or Media Rights:
- Scenario: Attorney Sarah cannot negotiate a book deal about her client’s case without the client’s written consent.
-
Third-Party Compensation:
- Scenario: Attorney Lisa can accept payment from a client’s family member only if the client consents and it does not interfere with her professional judgment.
-
Multiple Clients in Same Case:
- Scenario: Attorney Mark represents multiple clients in a lawsuit and must inform each of them about all claims and their involvement in any settlement.
-
Testifying for Clients:
- Scenario: Attorney Jane avoids testifying for her client unless it’s on formal matters or essential for justice, and in such cases, she hands over the trial to another lawyer.
This mnemonic and examples help in remembering the main points of conflict-of-interest rules for current clients.
VIII. LEGAL AND JUDICIAL ETHICS WITH PRACTICAL EXERCISES
B. Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability (A.M. No. 22-09-01-
SC)
3. Canon III – Fidelity
d. Limited Legal Services – Sections 35-40
Limited = will not provide continuing legal services in the matter.
