Vicarious Liability Evaluation Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is VL?

A

When an employer can be sued for the acts/omissions(tort) of an employee

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How do you introduce an evolution question ?

A

REWORD THE QUESTION!
what is VL?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the 1st element of VL

A

identify tory, no tort = no VL

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the second element of VL and case

A

Employment status (Barclays Bank Plc V VCs)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What did Lady Hale say in Barclays Bank Plc V Various Cs?

A

‘for any contractor carrying out his/her independent business it is not necessary to carry out the various tests’ or ‘of a relationship between 2 persons making it proper for the law to make one pay for the fault of the other’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the 1st test under Clear contract of Service case and explanation

A

control test (Yeowans V Noakes)
more control over staff more likely they’re an employee
less control, less likely (Mersey Docks)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the 2nd clear contract test case and explanation?

A

Integration test (Stevenson)
integral to running of organisation or just an accessory to it ?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Last test under clear contract explanation and cases?

A

Economic reality test (RMC V MoP&NI)
1) work for a wage ?
2) express/implied accepts under control
3) elements inconsistent with IC contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Who set out the 5 criteria points under ambiguous contract ?

A

Lord Phillips in CCWS V VCs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the 5 criteria points

A

1) E more likely to have means to compensate
2) tort is a result of activity on behalf of E
3) part of business activity
4) by employing created risk of tort
5) under control of employer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What does case of Institute of Brothers of Christian Schoold say ?

A

ambiguous contract covers situations of abuse by people in positions of authority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What does Cox V ministry of Justice say

A

ambiguous covers when D acting in a volountary capacity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Armes V Nottingham covers what ?

A

When local authority has sufficient control over Ds actions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is last element of VL

A

In course of employment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What tests did lord Salmond provide about non-intentional torts

A

1)acting against orders (Rose/Twine)
2) outside employment (Beard V LGO)
3)negligently (CI V IRTB)
4)frolic of their own (Hilton V Thomas Burton)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Lister V Hesley Hall set out what test under Intentional torts?

A

1)relationship of employment
2) tort closely connected to employment (CCWS)

17
Q

What does WM Morrison Supermarket Plc V vCs say?

A

intentional vengeance= not liable

18
Q

What is indemnity ?

A

when the employer can claim back some damages off D ( Lister V Romford ICE & Cold Storage Co.)

19
Q

What are the 4 criticisms

A

1) unfair on employers
2) too many tests to establish employee
3)unpredictable outcomes
4)hard for employee to claim back for negligent employees

20
Q

What evidence is there to back up Unfair on Employers?

A

the employer is responsible for hiring/training/supervising e ( Limpis V LGO)
maintains a high standard (Rose V Plenty)

21
Q

Explain how this is unfair to employers

A

unfair to blame E for actions of e
argue fair as E may benefit from negligent work
or fair as they have meant to compensate

22
Q

Evaluate how this is unfair on E

A

Unfair to be sued for es negligent work

23
Q

Give evidence to back up that there are too many tests to establish e

A

Clear contract tests too narrow (JGE V Trustees of Portsmouth)
more than one E can be liable for single e (Viasystems/Mersey Docks/RMC)

24
Q

Explain how the evidence suggests there are too many tests

A

one test appropriate as E know who VL for
unfair and unpredictable
could lead to hiring of self-employed to avoid VL

25
Q

Evaluate the fact there are too many tests for establishing e

A

one singular test would be more beneficial

26
Q

give evident to back that there are unpredictable outcomes

A

acting outside employment & frolic of their own (CI V NIRTB/Hilton)
liable for injuries to child (Rose) but not adult (Twine)
‘closely connected’ has given too broad of circumstances (Lister)

27
Q

explain how the evidence suggests the law has unpredictable outcomes

A

law inconsistent, case law applied differently
hard to follow for judges & lawyers
AND allow V to be compensated

28
Q

Evaluate that the law allows unpredictable outcomes

A

decisions can be harsh and all depend on if E benefit or not even if unauthorised = unfair

29
Q

Give evidence on how it is hard for E to claim back

A

Civil Liability Act in theory fair BUT reality unfair an unlikely to be able to get back money (Lister V Hesley Hall)

30
Q

Explain how the evidence shows it is hard for E to claim back

A

if e imprisoned no way to claim back

31
Q

Evaluate the fact it is hard for Es to claim back

A

unrealistic & unfair, doesn’t protect E