negligence Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

what the case of Donoghue V Stevenson say

A

Naighbour Principle- must take reasonable care to avoid acts/omissions which may reasonably foreseeably cause your neighbour harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is a neighbour

A

Neighbour- anyone directly affected by your actions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what case do we use to establish a DoC

A

Capara V Dickman

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the 3 tests in Caparo V Dickman and cases

A
  1. harm reasonably foreseeable ( Kent V Griffith)
  2. proximity/relationship (Watson V BBBC/ Nettleship V Weston)
  3. fair, just, and reasonable to impose DoC (Hill V CCWY)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What does the case of Robinson V CCWYPS describe

A

A pre existing DoC through previous precedent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

case for DoC from teacher-student

A

Mullins V Richard’s

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the the case of Bollum V Friern Barnet Hosptial for in relationship to DoC

A

DoC from doctor-patient

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is case for DoC from employer-employee

A

Watson V BBC & R V Adomako

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Andrew’s V DPP & Nettleship V Weston are cases for what

A

pre existing DoC from driver-passengers/pedestrians

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

DoC from solicitor/barrister-client case?

A

Hall v Simons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is Bolton V Stone for?

A

DoC from Sports Venue-Neighbours

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the case for people competing in competitive sports

A

Condon V Basi

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the Case for Breach of Duty and what does it say?

A

Blythe V Birmingham Waterworks- breach=falling below standards of reasonable person
standard of reasonableness=objective test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the 4 categories which held determine level of care

A

Professionals
Children
Level of Skill
Children

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the case for professionals

A

Bolam V Friern Barnet Hospital

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the law on learners & case ?

A

Held to same standard as a competent person (Nettleship V Weston)

17
Q

What is the case for children in breach of duty

A

Mullins V Richards

18
Q

Case for level of skill

A

Wells V Cooper

19
Q

What are risk factors ?

A

things that may mean the standard of care owed will be higher/lower

20
Q

What does a special characteristic mean?

A

A higher standard of care owed (Paris V Stepney Borough Council)

21
Q

What is magnitude of risk?

A

How big is the risk? Bolton V Stone

22
Q

What does practicality of precautions entail?

A

How easy/cheap would it have been for the D to avoid the risk- Latimer V AEC Ltd.

23
Q

What is the case of Roe V Minister of Health

A

Known risk=no breach

24
Q

What does a social benefit mean for the standard of care?

A

If in order to help society- Watt V Hertfordshire CC

25
Q

What 2 things must be proved for damage?

A

Causation and Remoteness

26
Q

Barnet V Chelsea & Kensington Hosptial relates to what ?

A

‘But for’ test- factual causation

27
Q

What is legal causation in regards to damage

A

NAI
actions by claimant- Corr V IBC Vehicles
actions by nature- Carsolgue Steamship
actions by 3rd party- Knightly V Johns

28
Q

How many tests are there for remoteness

A

3

29
Q

What is the first test for remoteness

A

Was the damage/harm reasonably foreseeable? - Wagon Mound No.1

30
Q

What is the second test for remoteness

A

Type of damage/harm reasonably foreseeable - Bradford V Robinson Rentals

31
Q

What is the last test for remoteness

A

‘Thin Skull’ Rule - Smith V Leech Brain
(unless unknown to medical science - Doughty V Turner Asbestos)