Vicarious Liability Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is vicarious liability

A

Liability for someone else

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What 3 things must be proven for vicarious liability

A
  1. Tort was committed by tortfeasor
  2. Must be relationship of employment/similar between the tortfeasor and the D
  3. Tort must occur in the course of employment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is said about the tort having to be committed by the tortfeasor

A

The employee/similar must have been negligent/created nuisance for liability to be imposed on employer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What relationship must be present between the d and tortfeasor

A

Must be employee of D of have a relationship akin to employment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What case speaks about independent contractors in relation to liabilty

A

Barclays Bank v various claimants- there is no liability for torts of independant contractors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the 3 tests to decide if a person has an employee status

A
  • control test
  • integration/organisation test
  • economic reality/multiple test
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Explain the control test

A

If an employer has right to control what employee did they are an employee

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What case was used for the control test

A

Hawley v luminar leisure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What case is used for the integration test and what is said

A

Stevenson Jordan and Harris v McDonald and Evans
- if worker fully integrated into business= employee
- if work is only an accessory to the business= not employee

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What case establishes the 3 part test to determine employment for the economic reality test

A

Ready mix concrete v minister of pensions
1. Employee agrees to provide work/skill for a wage
2. Employee expressly/impliedly accepts that work will be subject to control of employer
3. All other considerations in contract are consistent with there being a contract of employment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What 4 things are regarded as in the course of employment

A
  • authorised acts
  • authorised acts done in forbidden way
  • authorised acts carried out in negligent manner
  • close connection test
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Explain authorised acts as an action in the course of employment

A

If employee is expressly/impliedly authorised to do act= in course of employment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Explain authorised acts done in a forbidden way, use a case

A

Depends on if employee was conducting contractural/employment duties (rose v plenty)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What case is used for authorised acts carried out in a negligent manner

A

Century insurance v NI

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Explain the close connection test

A

If act has close connection to employment= in the course of employment (even for criminal acts)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what case is used for the close connection test and what is said

A

Mohamud v Morrisons
- what’s the nature of the job
- was there sufficient connection between the job and the wrongful conduct to make it right for employer to be held liable

17
Q

What 2 actions are not regarded to be in the course of employment

A
  • unauthorised acts
  • employee acting in a frolic
18
Q

Explain unauthorised acts as an action not in the course of employment

A

Unauthorised acts outside of employment duties

19
Q

Explain employee acting in a frolic

A

Injury/loss is caused to C while employee is outside area/time of employment- means the employer can’t be vicariously liable

20
Q

What case explains what a frolic is and what is it said to be

A

Sherborne v CRUK- actions of the tortfeasor not within the field of activities entrusted by the employer

21
Q

What case is also used for employee acting a frolic and what is said

A

Morrisons v various C’s- if employee intentionally commits tort to harm employer as a vendetta with no benefit of the employer- this will not be regarded as being connected to employment

22
Q

Explain the employers indemnity when compensating the C

A

If employer and employee both liable, the C doesn’t get double the compensation

23
Q

What does the civil liability (contribution) act 1978 say about in relation to employer indemnity

A

If the employer is found liable for the employees tort, the employer can sue the employee to recover damages, and can also recover compensation paid out from the employee (deduction from wages)