Negligence- Pure Economic Loss Flashcards

1
Q

What is purely economic loss

A

Economic/financial loss not caused by personal injury/property damage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What 3 cases are used for pure economic loss

A

Spartan steel v martin
Hedley Byrne v heller
Caparo v dickman

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What does the case of spartan steel v martin say about PEL

A

There is No duty of care in relation to PEL resulting from negligent acts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What does the case of hedley Byrne v heller say about PEL

A

Only establish liability in PEL for negligence when there’s a negligent misstatement made by the D in the course of a special relationship which caused the PEL

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Whats the 1st aspect that needs to be proven for special relationship to be proved as stated in the case of caparo v dickman

A

The Person giving the advice possesses/purports to posses a special skill/certain expertise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Whats the second element that needs to be proven for special relationships

A

The person giving the advice knows its being required for the purpose described at the time to the C, and will be relied upon

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Whats the 3rd element that needs to be proven for special relationships

A

C does reasonably rely upon statement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly