Nuisance- Ryland V Fletcher Flashcards

1
Q

What was the new and separate tort that rylands v fletcher created

A

Escape of substances held on land likely to be dangerous if escapes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What must the C have in order to make a claim

A

Interest in the land (be occupier/tenant)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What must the D be in order to have a claim made against them under R v F

A

Must be occupier or in control of the land

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Who decided on the 4 elements of R v F

A

Blackburn J and the House of Lords

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the 4 elements of R v F

A
  1. D brought something onto his land
  2. D made unnatural use of land
  3. Thing was likely to do mischief if escaped
  4. Thing did escape and cause damage
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

For elements 1 what must the thing be that was brought onto the land

A

Not naturally present e.g. gas/electric/chemicals/trees

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What case was used for d brought something onto his land

A

Ryland v fletcher

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Explain the elements of d made non natural use of land

A

It requires proof of extraordinary/unusual use of land, if d is use it for an ordinary purpose even if a non-natural substance is used- there is no claim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What case is used for d making a mom natural use of land and what is said

A

Transco v Stockport- nature of land and timing are relevant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Explain the element of likely to do mischief if escapes

A

Damage must be a forseeable consequence of the escape

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What case was used for the element of thing likely to do mischief if escapes

A

Cambridge water v eastern countries leather

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Explain the element of the thing did Escape and cause damage

A

Escape= substance move from property of d to property of c
Must be damage to property, no claim if it was personal injury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What did the Case of R v F said out the requirement of the thing escaping and causing damage

A

There will be no claim available if the thing doesn’t escape

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What case is used for the thing did escape and cause damage

A

Wyvern tyres v gore

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the 3 defences of R v F

A
  • act of stranger
  • act of god
  • statutory authority
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Explain the defence of act of stranger and use a case

A

Act of stranger causes the escape, who the D has no control of
Perry v Kendricks

17
Q

Explain the defence of act of god

A

Extreme weather conditions cause the escape, that the D couldn’t reasonably have protected against

18
Q

Explain the defence of statutory authority

A

An act of parliament authorises the activity

19
Q

What are the remedies of R v F

A

Damages