Verdicts and Judgment Flashcards
Default Judgment
- One party fails to plead or defend
- Court enters Default Judgment
Voluntary Dismissal
- Plaintiff voluntarily dismisses the case
- Before Answer/ Summary Judgment
- THEN, the first one is without prejudice. (If it’s AFTER or 2 second time, then it With Prejudice)
Involuntary Dismissal
- COURT dismisses the case by court order
Involuntary Dismissal (usually with prejudice)
- failure to state a claim
- failure to obey court order
- failure to prosecute
Involuntary Dismissal (without prejudice)
- lack of jurisdiction
- venue
- failure to join indispensable party
Judicial Bias: Challenge for Cause
- the appearance of bias
- parties CAN waive
Judicial Bias: Grounds for Recusal
Judge MUST recuse himself and parties
CANNOT WAIVE if the Judge:
1) judge has personal knowledge of facts
2) judge acted as lawyer with one of the other lawyers in the past
3) judge had expressed an opinion on merits while in government employment
4) judge or immediate family has financial interest in subject matter or with a party
5) judge violates due process rights
Claim and Issue Preclusion
- Res Judicata/Claim Preclusion
- Collateral Estoppel/ Issue Preclusion
Res Judicata/ Claim Preclusion
1) Same parties or privity
2) Same transaction or occurrence
3) Judgment on the merits
Res Judicata: Merger
- plaintiff wins case
- claim merges into judgment
- cannot sue on same cause of action
Res Judicata: Bar
- plaintiff loses case
- barred from suing on same cause of action
Can Plaintiff split their Claim?
No.
I.e. If I lose on money damages, I can’t try suing on equitable relief.
Res Judicata does not apply to:
1) dismissal for lack of jurisdiction
2) dismissal for improper venue
3) settlement (unless after settlement, case is dismissed with prejudice)
*Because these are not final judgments on merits
Can you bring suit again after Change of Law?
No.
Even if the law changes, and a loss would now mean a win, once there is a final judgment, you cannot bring suit again.
Privity
- Legal or special relationship
- Res Judicata applies
Collateral Estoppel/ Issue Preclusion
1) same ISSUE as previously litigated
2) final judgment (was actually litigated and decided)
3) the issue was necessary to judgment
Res Judicata Indicator
Same parties, same transaction or occurrence, final judgment
Collateral Estoppel does not apply:
1) settlement
2) default judgement
Necessary to Judgment
Party preclusion is asserted against must have had full and fair opportunity to litigate in the first suit
Collateral Estoppel typically has
THREE people
(original parties + New Plaintiff or New Defendant)
Can Defendant prevent NEW plaintiff from bringing suit via Collateral Estoppel?
NO
P1 v. D. D loses. P2 wants to sue D for same issue.
D CANNOT use collateral estoppel
P v. D1. P loses. P wants to sue D2 on same issue.
Defensive Use of Collateral Estoppel
- D2 CAN use Collateral Estoppel against P
P1 v D. P1 wins. P2 wants to sue D.
Offensive Use of Collateral Estoppel
Diversity Case. Two different jurisdictions. Which preclusion rule would apply?
Where was the first case decided?
- First case in Federal Court, apply federal preclusion rule to second case
- First case in State Court, apply the first jurisdiction’s preclusion rule to second case
Full Faith & Credit
One state must respect the other’s judgments