VBHC - week 4 Flashcards
value agenda
- organize into integrated practice units
- measure outcomes and costs for every patient
- move to bundled payment for care cycles
- integrate care delivery across separate facilities
- expand excellent services across geography
Why do we need payment reform?
- Financial incentives influence provider behavior
o For example: providers who are payed fixed fees for every treatment/test are tempted to deliver more care - Providers in position to influence demand
Wat are disadvantages of fee-for-service?
- Currently, providers are largely paid through the method of fee-for-service (or some variant thereof)
- This method, however, is poorly aligned with value as it:
o Rewards volume - which could result in overtreatment and unnecessarily expensive care, and this is simply because providers are getting more salary if they provide more
o Maintains fragmentation - Coordinating care and making sure that the patient is getting the right treatment from the right specialist is not rewarding
o Discourages prevention - Providers would get less income if they would treat less people
o Has no link with quality
Bundled payment
A single, prospective payment per period for accepting accountability for the provision of a bundle of care services related to a condition
- Ideally covers the complete cycle of care (but rare in practice)
- Aggregates payments for separate services along 2 possible dimensions:
1. Across time = providers accountability includes services they can place within an extended time window as compared to the current fee for service system.
2. Across providers = these providers may be working in the same setting or in a different setting. In same setting it is for all the people working in the hospital that have worked fort his cycle of care. In a different setting it means that it is fort he hospitals and the rehabilitation clinic.
Bundled payment – advantages
Stimulates involved providers to:
* Minimize costs for care covered by the payment
* Coordinate care well, realize seamless integrated care
* Improve quality by reducing harmful overtreatment
* Prevent complications (if part of bundle)
Bundled payment – limitations/risks
- Unwarranted increase in the number of bundles to upset their financial risk or accountability for the individual bundles
o Als ziekenhuizen een bundle krijgen voor een bepaalde operatie, dan zullen zij eerder een operatie uitvoeren dan dat ze medicijnen uitschrijven. Ook al is beide even effectief. - Underutilization of necessary services
o This could be countered by adding additional incentives for quality - Risk selection (‘cherry picking’)
o Providers try to attract patients with low expected costs for the condition in question
o This could by countered by adjusting payment for different patient charasteristics - Compartmentalization of patients into separate conditions
o This is not good for the patients with multiple conditions
Pay-for-performance
Explicit financial incentives for ‘good performance’ as measured by a set of predefined indicators
* Performance often operationalized as quality of care, usually measured using process indicators (≠ outcome!)
* P4P typically applied as relatively small add-on to existing payment structures (leaving incentives in those underlying payments intact)
Pay-for-performance – advantages
- Theoretically and intuitively appealing
- May contribute to better care (if done well)
- May enable providers to invest in quality
Pay-for-performance – limitations/risks
- ‘Performance’ difficult to measure (especially outcomes), so it may lead to only focusing on the performances that can be measured even though other unmeasurable performances are as important as the performances that can be measured
- Flawed incentives in underlying payment system left intact
o Might not impact overall value - Might lead to undesired strategic behavior
o Select people where the changes are higher to score better on performances
o Focusing on the performances that can be measured
o Manipulating scores so that the scores look better than they are
Hospitals value based purchasing
compares outcomes of hospitals for example morbidity, tries to correct for case mix so that the outcomes are comparable and then gives bonusses to hospitals that score better than average
Hospital readmission reduction
looks at readmissions and it assumes that certain readmissions could have been avoided if good quality care had been provided.
Hospital-acquired condition reduction
looks at infections and other hospital-acquired conditions that could have been prevented if there was a good quality of care.
achievement points
How is your hospital doing compared to other hospitals?
Pay-for-performance – design options
- What to incentivize?
* Which medical conditions and which indicators?
* Who collects the required data, and how?
* How to guarantee valid and reliable measurements? - Whom to incentivize?
* Individual professionals or groups or organizations? - How to incentivize?
* Using rewards or penalties (or both)?
* How much to pay (as % of total income/revenue)?
* How to translate indicator scores to payments?
improvement goals
improve outcomes compared to outcomes from the same hospital earlier on