Valuation - KT Qs Flashcards
What are the 5 methods of valuation?
Comparative Method
Investment Method
Profits Method
Residual Method
Depreciated Replacement Cost (DRC)
Which methods have you got experience of?
Comparative Method
Investment Method
Talk me through (step-by-step) your valuation in Islington?
(They may say - tell me about a valuation instruction end-to-end).
I valued a Freehold office building in Islington, as the client was considering whether the sell the property.
Therefore, it was NOT a Red Book valuation (as this is one of the 5 exemptions).
I assessed my competence (SUK), carried out a Conflict of Interest check and ensured Terms of Engagement were signed and returned.
I then inspected and measured the property, taking note of the buildings location, condition and specification.
As the property was owner-occupied, I used the COMPARATIVE METHOD.
- I sourced my comparables
- VERIFIED the details by speaking to relevant agents. This allowed me to devalue the headline rent to get the NET EFFECTIVE RENT.
- I then created a schedule of comparables
- Adjusted comps in relation to the HIERARHCY OF EVIDENCE.
- Analysed to form opinion on Market Rent (MR) and Market Value (MV) .
- I then stood back & looked. Report the value and saved on file.
How else could you have approached it?
Was there enough Freehold VP sales evidence around?
Used the investment method as a cross-check.
Capitalising the income stream to produce a capital value.
Describe the property in your Islington example?
1980s construction
15,000 sq ft
Lower Ground to 4th floor
Grade B spec
1 minute walk from Angel tube station
You mention the Hierarchy of Evidence - what is this?
Framework for comparables based on weighting:
Category A = DIRECT COMPARABLES
- Data from the subject property itself (the best)
- Completed transactions from near-identical properties.
- Contemporary, full and accurate information.
Category B = GENERAL MARKET DATA
- Published sources / Commercial Databases (e.g. CoStar).
- Historic Evidence
- Supply and Demand data.
Category C = OTHER SOURCES
- Wider market data (interest rates, stock & shares).
- MSCI
When using the comparative method, is there any specific guidance you adhere to?
RICS Professional Standard: “Comparable Evidence in Real Estate Valuation” (2019) - now a Professional Standard in 2023.
It specifically outlines the Hierarchy of Evidence.
What makes a good comparable?
Huge focus on “Contemporary” in the Hierarchy of Evidence (“Contemporary, full and accurate information”).
The best comparable will be in the subject property itself.
Strong comparable will be an almost identical property, next door to the subject property which transacted yesterday and you have full & accurate information on the deal. Think:
- Contemporary
- Location
- Similarity
- Transparency
- Arms-length, open market transaction
How did you find your comparable evidence?
Inspection of the local area to find ‘TO LET’ boards
Speaking with local agents
CoStar / Property databases and VERIFY the information.
What would you do when there is a lack of comparable evidence?
(This is a good question)
Have to rely on historical data and ‘quoting prices’
Look down the Hierarchy of Evidence and consider Category B / C evidence such as supply and demand data.
Look to use an alternative valuation method which is less reliant on comparable evidence.
Always consider market sentiment at the time where there is a lack of comparable evidence.
Also consider VPGA 10 “Matters that give rise to Material Uncertainty”.
Why was your Valuation at Islington NOT a Redb Book valuation?
Because it was for AGENCY PURPOSES (the client was considering whether to sell the building).
Remember ALIES (Agency, Litigation, Internal purposes, Expert Witness, Statutory purposes).
What was the Market Value you arrived at for your Islington example?
£7.5m.
(£500 per sq ft).
Tell me some of the main factors that would impact upon an office valuation such as this one?
Location
Size
Condition
Internal Specification
Asset Class
ESG credentials
You also valued a multi-tenanted office building in Camden, and you did an approach per tenancy as I understand it, i.e you valued it per floor. What was the Basis of Valuation you used for that please?
Fair Value (because it was for Financial Accounting Purposes).
The International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS 13) had been adopted by the client.
Talk me through your Valuation in Camden (step-by-step)?
I valued a multi-tenanted office building in Camden for Financial Accounting Purposes.
Therefore, the Basis of Value was FAIR VALUE (must say this) as the client had adopted International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS 13).
Firstly, I assessed my competence (SUK), carried out a Conflict of Interest check and ensured Terms of Engagement were signed and returned.
Then began STATUTORY DUE DILIGENCE checks (to check there were no material matters which could impact upon the value).
Then I inspected & measured the property (taking note of the location, condition and specification).
I then began researching the market for rental and captial comparable evidence.
As the property was let and income producing, I used the Investment Method of valuation.
I applied SPLIT YIELDS to reflect the RISK PROFILE of the current tenants.
The first floor tenant had 7 years unexpired on their lease and a Dun & Bradstreet check showed they were of good quality covenant. Therefore, I applied a yield of 6%.
However, the ground floor tenant had 1 years remaining on the lease and the D&B check was more risky. Therefore, I applied a higher yield of 7% to reflect the risk.
I then provided my supervisor (who was a Reigstered Valuer) with a summary form to review.
Was this the conventional investment method?
How did you establish what yields to apply?
Yes because the property was rack-rented. The split yields were to reflect the risk profile.
The yields were arrived at from comparable evidence. Used a Central London yield guide.