utilitarianism Flashcards
utility
- how useful something is
- an object or action has utility if it helps to bring about something are aiming for
- for objects and actions to have utility, we must have goals and desires in the first place
psychological hedonism
- a descriptive theory of human motivation
- the individual’s potential pleasure and the avoidance of pain are the sole aims of the individual’s action
hedonism
for each individual, pursing pleasure and avoiding pain is the right thing to do
the three types of utilitarianism
- act utilitarianism - we should act to maximise pleasure and minimise pain in each specific instance
- rule utilitarianism - we should follow general rules that maximise pleasure and minimise pain
- preference utilitarianism - we should act to maximise people’s preference
act utilitarianism
Jeremy Bentham’s act utilitarianism can be boiled down to three claims:
- whether an action is right or wrong depends solely on its consequences
- the only thing good is happiness
- no individual’s happiness is more important than anyone else’s
Bentham’s principle of utility
that principle which approves or disapproves of every action whatsoever, according to the tendency which it appears to have to augment or diminish the happiness of the party whose interest is in question
the felicific calculus
- it quantifies happiness
- used to calculate utility by adding up all the happiness and subtracting all the pain
what is felicific calculus made up of
- intensity
- duration
- certainty
- propinquity
- fecundity
- purity
- extent
motive and government (Bentham)
- the goal of utilitarianism is best achieved by social engineering
- government house utilitarianism: the idea that the goals of utilitarianism are best achieved by the state manipulating the masses
- by making laws and changing crime and punishment, we can modify people’s intentions to align individuals happiness with general happiness
problems with act utilitarianism
difficult to calculate
- complicated to use every single time you have to make a decision
- how do you decide between a longer lasting dull pleasure and a short lived more intense pleasure
- assumes it is possible to know how intense a pleasure will be in the first place
problems with act utilitarianism
tyranny of majority
- there are some actions that are wrong regardless of the circumstances
- eg someone has been murdered and a crowd of people want justice. It would make the crowd happy to see the murderer apprehended and to face justice for his crimes. But what if the police can’t find the murderer. They could lie and frame an innocent man. If the crowd believe that the murderer has been caught then they will be happy. the crowd’s collective happiness would out way the framed man’s pain
problems with act utilitarianism
moral status of particular relationships
- friends and family are more important to us than strangers
- but act utilitarianism is only concerned with the greatest good for the greatest number. There are no grounds, then, to justify acting to maximise their happiness over some random person on the street
problems with act utilitarianism
higher and lower pleasures
- Bentham’s felicific calculus seeks to quantify happiness
- it can be argued that the quantitive approach makes utilitarianism a ‘doctrine of swine’
- it reduces the value of human life to the simple pleasures felt by pigs and animals
- response: Mill’s higher and lower pleasures
strengths of act utilitarianism
- it takes into account the pleasure and pain of everyone affected
- it provides a way of calculating what is right and comparing actions
- everyone agrees that pleasure is good and pain is bad, therefore actions can be justified to others
the pleasure machine (Nozick)
imagine scientists have developed a pleasure machine that gives you guaranteed pleasure as soon as you are hooked up to it
the pleasurable sensations will vary in intensity
once you have stepped in, you can not come back out
- it is a criticism of psychological hedonism
- if you are happy to sign up to the machine, it proves the truth of psychological hedonism
- according to act utilitarianism, everyone should step into the machine because all that matters is maximising pleasure
- but it is morally wrong to ignore people’s preference
- shows that there are more important things in life than simple pleasures