Utilitarianism Flashcards
Utilitarianism idea
An action is right if it produces the greatest good for the greatest number. Whatever action benefits the most people is the right action.
Utilitarianism: key thinkers
- Jeremy Bentham
- J.S. Mill
- Peter Singer
How did Jeremy Bentham see human behaviour?
He saw it as hedonistic - as humans we are naturally motivated by pleasure and pain
How is the rightness and wrongness of actions determined, according to utilitarianism?
The rightness and wrongness of actions is down to how much pain and pleasure the action causes and to how many people it causes it to.
What type of Utilitarianism did Bentham develop?
Act Utilitarianism
What is the Hedonic Calculus?
This weighs up the pleasure and pain of an action by focusing on 7 things
Categories of the Hedonic Calculus
- its intensity
- its duration
- its certainty
- its propinquity
- its fecundity
- its purity
- its extent
The Hedonic Calculus: intensity
How strong it is
The Hedonic Calculus: duration
How long it is
The Hedonic Calculus: certainty
How likely it could be
The Hedonic Calculus: propinquity
When it could arrive
The Hedonic Calculus: fecundity
If it will cause further pleasure
The Hedonic Calculus: purity
How free from pain it is
The Hedonic Calculus: extent
How many people are affected
Give an example where it can be argued that act utilitarianism works well
You are on a boat and see 2 people drowning in one area of the sea and 1 person drowning in another. You don’t have time to reach both places. The utilitarian principle would say to save the 2 people over the 1, because it promotes the greatest good for the greatest number.
Give some problems with Act Utilitarianism
- it can allow for any action to take place, as long as it generates the greatest good for the greatest number - so even the most evil actions can be acceptable if they generate the most good.
- it does nothing for the minorities and only focuses on the majority, so justice is irrelevant as it only focuses on pleasure
- it is not very practical when faced with quick moral choices. This is because you don’t have time to weigh up all the pleasure, pain and people involved and use the Hedonic Calculus.
- we can’t ever truly know if an action will serve the greatest good for the greatest number. This is because it is something that is so hard to predict.
Problem with Act Utilitarianism: it can allow even the most evil actions to happen
If 10 sadists are torturing and innocent person, act utilitarianism would suggest that this is acceptable, because it is generating the greatest good for the greatest number.
Problem with Act Utilitarianism: we can’t ever truly know if an action will serve the greatest good for the greatest number
For example, in a case of 2 people drowning in the sea in one area and 1 in another, act utilitarianism would say to save the 2 (because it seems to cause the greatest good for the greatest number), but, what if the one person has the cure for cancer and will save millions of other people from dying? Surely saving him would result in the greatest good?