Using Evidence to Ensure Public Health Flashcards

1
Q

Determinants of Health

A

Socioeconomic, Enviornmental, Genetics, Health Care

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Assessment

A

Monitor health status and invesitgate health problems to protect people from health hazards

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What US fed cabinet department is responsible for public health?

A

Department of health and human services

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Incidence and what increases it?

A

New cases during a time interval…more liberal case definitions and improved diagnostic methods

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Prevalence and what increases?

A

Number with a given disease at a given time divided by pop atrisk

Does not distinguihs new from established

Txs preventing death will increase

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Adv and disadv to crude mortality

A

Easy

Underestimates true difference and should be higher in older populations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Case fatality

A

Proportion of death from a certain cause over certain time

Standardizes data based upon specific condition

Only meaningful for short periods

Screening decreases fatalities…even if not better outcomes

Poor access to care increases fatality…even if good txs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Infant mortlaity rate

A

Proportion of live born infants who die by 1 yr

Most sensitive indicator of overall societal health

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Life expectancy

A

Overall measure of pop health…not affected by age composition of the population

Altered by rare events

Not estimate of future expereince

May not reflect individual demographic differences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

QALY

A

Health related to quality of life scale

Captures both morbidity and mortality

Allows comparison of health system and health interventions

Std for health impacts and cost effectiveness analysis

Not translatable into a patient experience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Policy Development

A

Give people information

Engage community

Develop Policies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Assurance

A

Enforce public health law

Help ppl recive services

Maintain a competent health workforce

Evaluate and imrpvoe programs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

System Managment

A

Contribute to and apply the evidence base of public healt h

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

T0, 1,2,3,4,

A

Basi science

Humans

Pts

Practice

Community

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Case control benefits

A

INexpensive, Timely, high yield for rare or long-term outcomes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Selection bias

A

Study sample not representative of population at risk

17
Q

Confounding

A

A factor distorts the effect of another related factor

18
Q

Recall and interviewer bias

A

Inaccurate memory
Information bias
Different collection

19
Q

Benefits of cohort studies

A

Generalizable…accurate slice of a population

Best study design if randomization is not possible…the observational design least susceptible to bias

20
Q

Cohort study problems

A

Selection bias, confounding, interviewer bias

Surveillance bias - more aggressive diagnostic approahc in one group

Loss to follow up…those lost have different outcomes than those who remain (less than 5 is little, 5-20 could be biased, more than 20 often substantial bias)

21
Q

Def of a confounder

A

Factor associated with both exposure and outcome

THink age with smoking intensity and dz

22
Q

Strength
Temporality
Reversibility

A

Size of effect not due to plausible confounding

Cause precedes the outcome

Reduction in exposure decreases effect

23
Q

Biologic plausibility

Dose-response

Consistency

Similarity

A

Link

Effect increase with exposure

Relationship is repeated

Similar exposure lead to similar dz