Test 2 LEcture Flashcards

1
Q

primary, secondary and tertiary prevention

A

Primary - avert the occurrence of a dz or injury…might be the best way

seoncdary - early detection and intervention to slow or reverse

Tertiary - dz management to improve patient function

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

RCT things that still might not be good

A

Outcome assessment or follow-up

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Random error and how to reduce

A

Larger population

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Graph of 1 and 2 erorrs

A

1 will be closer to the non-control group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Radndomization

A

Each pt has equal chance to be assigned

Also random allocation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Stratified randomization

A

Balance randomization across a confounder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Allocation concealment

A

Person enrolling patients i unaware of the assignment…occurs prior to or time of randomization

May use a sealed envelope

Lack of concealment is a source of selection bias bc characteristics may change allocation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Patient outcomes

A

Patient recall (most subjective)

Discharge dx (better)

Case definition (best)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Intention to tx

A

Once randomized, always analyzed

Preserves baseline comparibility
Simplifies dealing with missing outcomes and poor adherence

Addresses withdrawl

Reflects real owrld outcomes from a tx

Need to enroll more pts to account for those that don’t finish…may underestimate effect size

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Assessing directness

A

DIff bt pop and study participants (Table)

Diff in tx of pop and study part

Use of surrogate outcome measures instead of outcome of interest

INdirect comparioson bt presence/absence of exppsore or risk factor (combinatorial appraoch)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How to assess consistency

A

Effect estimates across subgroups and outcome measures

Heterogeneity is minimal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Assessing precision

A

Use the CI

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly