Use Of Force Flashcards
PLAN?
Proportionate, legal, accountable, necessary
Use of force legal defences?
Common law, section 3 criminal law act 1967, section 117 police and criminal evidence act 1984, section 76 criminal justice and immigration act 2008
Where is article 2 of the ECHR enshrined?
Enshrined in Human Rights Act 1998
What does article 2 of the ECHR say?
Everyone has a right to life but deprivation of life shall not be regarded as in contravention of this article if the use of force is no more than absolutely necessary:
a. Defence of any person against unlawful violence, b. Affecting a lawful arrest or prevent escape, c. Lawfully quelling a riot or insurrection
Questions to ask when using force?
- Is it lawful and for a lawful purpose?
- Is it necessary? Are there other ways to achieve the lawful purpose?
- What is the minimum level of force necessary to achieve the lawful aim and would that level be proportionate or excessive?
What does Section 117 of PACE do?
Confers power on a constable to use reasonable force, if necessary, in the exercise of any other PACE power / part of the PACE legislation
Who can use force under S117 of PACE?
A police constable
Who can use force under common law and S3 of the criminal law act 1967?
Anyone
What is force?
Physical force but can include influences and anything that tends to produce an effect on the mind or will
What is common law self defence?
If you have an honestly held belief that you or another are in imminent danger then you may use such force as is reasonable and necessary to avert that danger
Under common law what is imminent?
Now. Can’t be ‘come outside’ has to be ‘I’m going to hurt you now’
What is an honestly held belief in common law self defence?
What the defendant knew and believed at the time. It doesn’t include what others may have known or believed or what the defendant may later know. The belief can be based on mistaken facts if honestly held.
What is reasonable and necessary force?
What any ordinary reasonable person would do given the defendants circumstances and based on what the defendant knew and believed at the time. Taking into account the pressure of being attacked, level of threat as the defendant believed it and the likely harm
What circumstances would using force based on a belief in mistaken facts not be a defence?
If the mistake arises due to involuntary intoxication
Can preemptive use of force be justified?
Yes circumstances may justify a preemptive strike