USA constitution Flashcards

1
Q

what is federalism and why did the founding fathers want to introduce a federal system of government?

A

This would be the relationship between the federal gov and the states, the FF would want to introduce this to protect the state rights, limited government and limit the power of Washington DC.
each state has it’s own elected government and constitution.
Death penalty will be different from state to state and Wyoming would introduce the firing squad.
the 10th amendment is crucial to federalism as any powers that are not given straight to the federal government are given to the states.
federalism is also designed to regulate trade within a state, this is from the commerce clause, Article 1, section 8.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What rights would be specifically given to the states?

A

Regulation of trade within a state, this would be part of the commerce clause of Article 1 Section 8.
elections within the state.
protect the publics health, welfare and morals.
Article 4, “full faith and credit”- this would be one law that is recongnised in one state can be recognised in all 50 states.
There would be Article 5 amendment.
These would be reserved powers- so they are given straight to the states and not the government.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what concurrent powers would be given to the states?

A

raise taxation
borrow money
spend money for the welfare of the people.
pass/enforce laws.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what are the powers that would be given only to Washington DC?

A

These would be enunciated powers, for example foreign affairs for the nation.
Regulation of the trade between the states.
Article 6 the supremacy clause, federal gov will always win in a dispute.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

why has the federal government in Washington grown in influence over the states?

A

The federal gov has exploited the “loopholes” that would be put in place, for example with the welfare clause and the commerce clause. For example, in a crisis the states in Covid 19.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what are two examples that show the relationship between the states and the federal governement?

A

1, Exploiting the state.
The federal government would say that they would give money to the states on the condition that they would meet certain targets. This would be seen in 2009 with the Educational programme with $4.3 billion, the states would have to meet the 20 goals in order to get the money.
2, Federal mandates, forced to comply
states have the rights to administer elections, in the 1965 Voting Rights Act, they would have to ask permission if they wished to alter this.
There would be Shelby County vs Holder, this would be declared as unconstitutional.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what is the role of the SC in federalism?

A

The vague nature of the C has led the SC to need to defend it.
Roe Vs Wade in 1973, this would be undermined with Dobbs vs Jackson in 2022.
Oberguff vs Aodges, 2015 this would be to make gay marriage legal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What does the state of Texas highlight with regards to federalism?

A

The state of Texas is a very prosperous one with a $1.9 trillion gross state profit, which would be the second highest in the UK.
In 2021 governor Abbot would be angered by the Supreme Court as they would rule in favour of the federal government as they would ruled that the state could not uphold the abortion ban. further conflicts with the federal government as Texas would have different policy ideas. For example Biden would have a more liberal view on immigration for example stopping that people crossing the border will be detained in Mexico. Adding to this, Biden will prevent new lands being used for gas and oil.
The critical race theory, would be the idea that racism should be taken seriously.
Texas would use the SC to challenge the Sc in 2016 over his plans for immigration, TX would win.
Texas would also refuse aid with the American rescue plan, they would refuse as they would say that this would limit the power that they would have over economic policy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Evaluate the view that the concept of federalism is dead in the USA- example plan

A

Ability to act in a crisis:
Yes
Keep children at home during the Covid 19 crisis, ability to overrride the exec.
32 goverenors would plan what to do over Covid. In Texas, in March 2021 Governor Abbot signed an EO to free Texas of covid restrictions.
No
Federal government would make key decisions over the Covid 19 crisis, 2008 financial crisis and the vaccine would be delivered by the federal government.

Can make laws independently.
Yes
Death penalty will be legal in 29 states
Marijuana
10th amendment
Some states will decide what to do over the banning of certain books.

No
Healthcare, Obama care forced states to comply

Actions of the sc affected the states
Yes
2016 Obama

No
2012 would uphold the affordable care act, this would defend the federal government

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what is the history of the US Constitution?

A

1776 would be the war of independence and this would lead to the defeat of the British in 1783.
It would be decided that the 13 colonies would be run as a confederacy, in 1781 the articles of confederation would be signed, this would be a formal friendship between the colonies, there would be no executive and no judiciary, the articles of confederation would be weak.
The Philadelphia Convention- in 1787 55 delegates from each of the 12/13 colonies, RI did not participate. There would be an agreement that the confederacy would be weak, but the FF would want to create a new government that would not be tyrannical and would encourage people to have their own liberties. A federal government, with a bill of rights and checks and balances was seen to be the answer.
There was the Virginia plan (congress of two chambers) and the New Jersey (congress of one chamber) plan, there would be the Connecticut promise, this would be a federal government there would also be powers that would be given to the states.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what is the nature of the US Constitution?

A

it is a codified constitution which means that it is a document that is written down and even amendments are changed.
The constitution would also set out the machine of the government and how each body of gov would have different powers.
The Constitution would be entrenched so it is difficult to change- this is highlighted in article V of the constitution which outlines the amendment process, as of 2024 there has only been 27 amendments.
The Constitution is also written with some vague language.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

how does the constitution outline the powers of each of the bodies of government?

A

Article one- this would be in relation to congress, this would highlight that congress is a national legislature and it would also highlight the method of election of its electors.
Article two- would indicate that the power of the executive would be in the hands of the president.
Article three- This would be in relation to the SC, it would highlight that it is the umpire of the constitution.
These are delagated powers which means that the executive does not have unlimited powers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what is the significance of the vagueness of the constitution? and what are examples of emunarted and implied powers?

A

The vagueness of the constitution would mean that the constitution could evolve without official agreement.
Congress:
Emunerated powers:
Exclusive powers to legislate, this is different between the houses.
Tax collection
Borrowing money on behalf of the US Gov.
declaration of war
amendment of the constitution.
Implied powers:
Congress was given the power to provide for the defence and the welfare of the people- this would imply that Congress would have the power to collect taxes and would have the power to levy.
From the power that Congress has with the Navy this will imply the power that congress has to draft people to go to war.
President.
Emunerated powers:
head of the executive branch
can nominate people to go to the SC
Commander in chief of the army
VETO
Implied:
is commander in chief of the air force even though it did not exist at the time.

Judiciary:
Emunerated power:
rule on cases regarding the constitution.
to declare acts of congress or actions of the executive.
the right to bear arms- this is why it has been difficult for there to be legislative change on this matter.

IMPLIED:
Judicial review

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what is the difference between reserve and concurrent powers?

A

reserve powers- these are powers that either the states/people have, this limits the federal government. These would include powers such as to declare war, make treaties, coin money.
Concurrent powers- these are powers that shared by the states and the federal government, for example collecting taxes, to establish a local government and collect taxes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

how does the amendment process work? and what are the bill of rights?

A

This process was made difficult so that the constitution cannot be easily changed. They can be proposed by Congress or the states, the only time it came close to the states proposing a change that would lead to change would be in 1992 this was over a balanced budget amendment. Of the 33 proposed amendments by congress the states have ratified 27 of them.
There are two methods that involve either the state/legislature starting to process. There is the need for a 2/3 then 3/4 majority, two states short in 1992.
The bill of rights are the first 10 amendments that were ratified into law, this was designed to protect the American people from a too central government.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

why has the constitution been amended so rarely?

A

The FF would create an amendment process that was designed to be difficult- the need for the states and congress to agree with supermajorities makes the process difficult.
in modern times the polarisation of the two parties has made the process difficult- with a large number of members and there being little central ground means that it is diffilcult to make amendments.
The vagueness of the constitution has allowed it to naturally evolve.

The SC and the power of judicial review- this allows the courts to change the Constitution where it no longer sees fit.
Americans are cautious when it comes to changing the constitution- the Constitution is held in high regard. Harris has strongly campaigned that Trump threatening to shred the constitution is highly damaging to the American constitution.
if things are seen to be a relic of the pass it is hard to get them changed, in 2009 there was the attempt to remove the EC which failed.
Flag burning 6 failed attempts, 2006 70% of people in congress supported it.

There have been 12,000 suggested amendments since the beginning of the consitution, 0.2% of those have passed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

what are the advantages of the formal amendment process?

A

protects the constitution- There were key features of the constitution which are needed to be upheld, for example the seperation of powers would be a key concern among the FF. Trump has described the system of checks and balances as “archaic”.

Protects states and upholds federalism- this will protect the 10th Amendment that the states have.

Requires broad support- The liberals that want to change the second amendment which may seem like a strong majority of people, in 2018 only 1/5 of people would support this. There often be contentious issues that lack broad support, for example the issue of flag discretion has had 28 proposals for amendment but has never received enough broad support.

prevents ill thought-out amendments- the lengthy process means that these amendments need to be highly though through.

the system has been said to work- it allows amendments to pass when needed but not ill-thought ones.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

what is the principles of the US constitution?

A

limited government- did not want the tyranny of monarchy.
separation of powers- divided government into three branches which were entirely independent from each other.
checks and balances- “ambition must be to counteract ambition” this is to make sure that each branch is working effectively.
bipartisanship- you may argue that this is no longer in place today- this was the principle to abolish factions.
federalism- there was a need for a stronger central government, this sought to limit both federal and state government.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

what is the difference between enumerated powers and implied powers?

A

enumerated- these are powers that are written down and are stated specifically.
implied powers- these are powers that are interpreted from what is stated in the constitution.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

what is the significance of government shutdowns?

A

for example in 2018-19 there was a shutdown of government from 22nd December to 25th January. This means that the government reached stalemate. This is significant as it displays the ineffectiveness of checks and balances.

21
Q

how does congress work alongside the political system?

A

congress elections take place every two years which means that there is always a need for government officials to follow the people.
in times of crisis congress works effectively for example in 9/11, passing emergency aid for Covid-19.

22
Q

what is the significance of a federal-state relationship and sanctuary cities. (SC)

A

Obama wanted to introduce immigration reform and they way that he became successful in this was to outline EO, this meant that he was able to enforce actions such as Deferred Action for Childhood arrivals, these did not grant citizenship but were able to ease the process for immigrants. These actions would soon be reversed by Trump.
A number of cities defied the changes and these were seen as SC.
in 2018 California were seen as the said term when they passed the Senate Bill 54, state and law enforcement would not be able to arrest or investigate people for federal immigration purposes. Trump threatened to withhold federal funds from SC. This led to Trump being sued by Chicago as he would withhold police funding from SC.

23
Q

how has federalism developed in the 21st century?

A

George W Bush- development of state power, Gonzales v Oregon 2006, effectively allowed state euthensasia, in defiance of the US attorney general.
development of federal powers- the USA PATRIOT act 2001, this increased the powers that the state had to find information about people.
No child left behind act 2002- this allowed for uniform school testing.

Barack Obama-
development of state powers, Obamacare 2010, this gave the power of medical insurance to the states.
development of federal power- Arizona vs US 2012- overturned a state law which increased the state law enforcement laws which allowed AZ to pursue immigration laws.

Donald Trump- increase of state laws, carpenter vs US 2018, the federal government must obtain a warrant for find a cellphones location.
development of federal power- EO stripping federal grants from SC, this was later found UC.

24
Q

what is the significance of the state and marijuana?

A

in 2016 alone there were 9 states that had policies on the ballot box that directly mentioned legalising the drug. the drug is legal medically in 30 states and recreationally in 9, this would make it difficult for the AG to enforce the federal controlled substances act, 1970.
This displayed that the power of federal government is limited.

25
Q

what is the significance of federalism today?

A

ways in which states retain their sovereignty:
Citizen’s rights- the rightsthat a citizen has varies from state to state, for example in Massacgussets a learner driver can get a permit from 14.
criminal punishment- the death penalty is a huge difference, there are currently 30 states that allow the death penalty.
Electoral regulation- there are different ways that states can execute elections, this can be by a paper ballot, an electoral ballot, these states can do this without needing a paper trail. Which has led to controversy, in 2016 21 states were targeted by hackers.
taxes- income tax varies from 0% to 13% in CA.

ways in which state sovereignty is challenged-
Citizen’s rights, there are national laws that inhibit the powers of a state, for example Obergfell vs Hodges.
criminal punishment- Kennedy vs Louisiana placed limits on the death penalty.
taxes- states are reliant on grant from the federal government to function.

26
Q

what are limits are there placed on democracy by the constitution?

A

The EC
Equal representation per states- each state has the same number of senators which is not equal for representation.

27
Q

How does the constitution uphold a liberal democracy and a representative one?

A

Liberal democracy:
The bill of rights ensures that rights are upheld this was evident in Snyder vs phelps when the right to free speech by the Westboro Baptist church was upheld.
the power of the SC ensures that independents protect the constitution.
checks and balances serve to have a limited government.

representative democracy-
all bills must begin in the HOFR, which is changed due to a two year election cycle.
The House of Representatives ensures proportionality in representation.
The amendments have extended the number of people that can vote in the USA.
The senate is elected
Amendments cannot be made without the approval of the states.

28
Q

how do the states not uphold these principles.

A

liberal democracy:
checks and balances can limit a government to the extent that it is no longer effective.
the EC
not all rights have been effectively protected, minority rights were questioned in Shelby vs holder.

representative democracy-
the SC holds vast amount of power to interpret the US Constitution and overrule the elected branches.
the senate represents the us by state and not by the nation.
there is the tyranny of the majority.

29
Q

how strong is the US Constitution?

A

strong:
the vagueness allows for it to be changed
codified
outlines the powers of each branch
the amendment process has worked and has prevented unecessary amendments.

Not strong:
the vagueness has allowed for a broader interpretation of the constitution.
has created gridlocks in when the government is divided.
amendments are difficult.

30
Q

how does the constitution affect the government today?

A

positive effect-
each branch of government has clarity over its role, for example Trump was limited when it came to him wanting to build a wall between Mexico as he could not gain the funding from congress. With Trump gaining low OPR when he first came into office in 2016 this means that congresspeople were forced to side with their constituents.

negative impact-
the constitution can lead to gridlock, in January 2018 the government was forced to shutdown, in 1995 this lasted for 21 days.

31
Q

how does the US and UK constitution compare?

A

sources-
the USA was a single document that was written in 1787 which accounts to 7000 words, there are also some unwritten parts of the constitution called conventions, for example it is a convention that each president in the US have their own constitution.

numerous written sources make ups the Uk constitution such as the HRA, conventions are also typical.

principles-
the FF embedded the principles of limited gov, sep of powers, C and B, bipartisanship and federalism.
The UK operated on the principle of fused powers, the UK remains a unitary gov.

sovereignty
constutiuon vs parliament

separation of powers
the branches in the US are somewhat separated, in the UK when the SC was created this didn’t create much separation, parliament is fused.

checks and balances,
yes in USA, no in the UK.

protection of rights.
bill of rights vs the HRS 98, the lack of power of the SC limits the protection of rights in the UK.

flexibility
vagueness of US conc vs uncodified us conc.

32
Q

what is the difference between federalism and devolution?

A

the shared sovereignty that is held by the states means that powers flow between the federal government and the states. The power in devolution is not so easy as parliament could take it away.
unitary vs federal system
both allow for a government that is more closely related to the people, for example Scotland can make decisions over some of its own taxes.
both systems are flexible and can be changed, as the power between the states/devolved nations developed.

33
Q

what is the significance of the voting rights amendment?

A

in Washington DC 700,000 people were denied representation in Washington DC, this is a democrat area. This would not be pursued by republicans as it wouldn’t aid them.
This is down to party politics.

34
Q

what is the significance of the ERA?

A

this amendment would be in Dec 1923, as of 2022 nothing has changed.
The pressure for this change would mount in the 60’s and 70’s, a majority of people would support the amendments.
Phyllis Schafly would be against the amendements, in 1980 Reagan would oppose the amendments- the bill was being blocked by a minority.
in 2021 there began to be a greater call for change.

35
Q

why were the founding fathers keen to have a bill of rights?

A

this is a way to prevent tyranny and ensures that rights are protected.

36
Q

to what extent does the US constitution promote democracy in the USA?

A

promotes:
Hof R is elected every two years
senate
checks and balances
elections every two years
representation at both state and federal level, tyranny is prevented.

does not promote democracy:
SC is an unelected body that has power over the interpretation of the constitution.
for the senate to have elections every 6 years is a long time- with a number being re-elected.
amendments to the constitution are difficult.
vague constitution.
the constitution can be abused for partisan reasons for example gun regulation.

37
Q

how effective has the constitution been at upholding its aims and principles?

A

limited government- constant elections
Though, powers have been eroded, senate, use of the presidential pardon (hunter Biden)

federalism- are able to retain authority, in recent years this has been questioned with covid-19.

checks and balances powers such as the SC can impeach someone, though no one has actually ever been impeached.

separation of powers, though the VP is speaker of the senate and the SC has been accused of being partisan, for example there is currently a 6-3 conservative majority.

38
Q

how do the provisions of the US/UK constitution differ/relate?

A

checks and balances:
D- the judiciary is not legally binding in the UK, though they can declare it to be incompatible.
S- impeachment/ vote of no confidence. the executive is limited by effective scrutiny.

separation of powers:
D- fused in the Uk, devolution vs federalism.
judiciary was only separated from the early 2000’s.
S- in both countries the judiciary is separate, devolution has increased the power of federal government.

amendment procedure-
D- this is easier to do in the Uk, due to condification. secondary legislation.
S- both have to go through votes, will be legally binding. Both have a body that will act as a safe guard.

sovereignty

protection of rights.
S- codicication, court will have the final say, ECtHR.

democracy-
D- different electoral systems, upper house in the Uk is unelected. US has regular elections.
S- both have directly elected powers.

39
Q

how do the nature of the constitutions in the US and UK compare?

A

entrenchment/amendement-
D- amendments are easier in the Uk, devolution has changed this per region.
there are multiple methods for the US
secondary legislation

S- EO/prerogative powers. They each have a safeguarding body.

vague/specific constitution- the codified/uncodified.
The SC has legal power over the constitution.
lack of clarity leads to disputes.

s- the HRA will be very specific like the constitution.
both of the constitutions have adapted to the modern era.

40
Q

what is the significance of a limited government? and how is this affected by a divided government?

A

This is achieved by checks and balances.
George W Bush was able to achieve bipartisanship because he would work with Edward Kennedy.

Divided government makes this more effective:
Bills are scrutinised
Bills such as MLK fed holiday
Crime control Act 1984
2020 coronavirus relief and aid, 2020.

Yet, bipartisanship is difficult to achieve, 220-215 in the 119th congress.

41
Q

how effective have checks and balances been? with the president?

A

Effective:
override a VETO with a 2/3 vote, declare war

Not effective:
Impeachment
people have been appointed that have a personal relationship with the president, Micheal Cohen was a close confidente of Trump.

42
Q

how effective have checks and balances been, with congress?

A

Effective:
president can VETO legislation
SC can declare that is has been UC
Obama would sign the JCPOA

Not Effective:
PATRIOT ACT was passed in 28 days.

43
Q

how effective have checks and balances been with the judiciary?

A

Effective:
Constitutional amendment
impeachment

Not effective:
mis-use of the presidential pardon.

44
Q

How did Obama show an imperial presidency?

A

This is where the government was seen to have a lot of power, for example 2012 Libya and 2008 financial crisis.

45
Q

How effective is the legislature at Checks and balances?

A

Executive:
Congress can amend, block and reject legislation.
They can override VETO with 2/3 of a vote. This took place when the US congress overoded Trumps VETO, the national defence authorisation act.
“power of the purse” is with congress
they can reject a budget by the president. The 2018-19 shutdown was caused by this. This also took place in 2013, with the delayed introduction of Obamacare.
declare war.
ratify treaties, Paris agreement?
They can impeach and investigate the branch, DT.

Yet, Trump’s call for a wall in Mexico would lead to a 35 day government shut down in Mexico.
Judiciary:
Congress can propose a constitutional amendment, the 27th amendment was in 1992 and concerned salaries of congress people.
Congress can impeach a judge, this took place in 1805.
they can also create new courts.

46
Q

how effective is the executive at checks and balances?

A

Legislature:
VETO, trump would VETO the Iran War Powers Regulation.
they can use executive agreements, avoid senate ratification.
Obama would sign the JCPOA in 2012.

YET, in 2017 Trump would want to get rid of the Obama Care Act but he would be blocked.
Biden would also seek to remove troops from Afghanistan without the consultation of congress.

Judiciary:
power of the presidential pardon

47
Q

How effective is the judiciary at checks and balances?

A

Legislature:
UC, 2014 Shelder vs Holder

Executive:
The SC can declare that the executive has been unconstitutional.
2014 they would decide that Obama had been unconstitutional in his appointments to the National Labour Relations.
2024- Biden wanting to get rid of Student debt. Citizens united vs FEC.

48
Q
A