socialism Flashcards
the origins of socialism?
This is an ideology that grew out of the enlightenment and takes an optimistic view of HN. It is a progressive ideology and shares a desire to liberate humans from oppression. They also believe in “foundation equality”- the belief that men and women are born equal. They reject both the traditional state and anarchism. Socialists argued for humans to have less autonomy in their daily lives.
how do socialists view human nature?
They have an upbeat and optimistic view of human nature, they believe that humans are naturally cooperative and generous. They believe that humans naturally seek comradeship. They take an optimistic view of how humans could be, as they don’t believe that Hn has been diluted. Socialists believe that human nature can be adjusted.
how do socialists view society?
Socialists believe that individuals are a product of the society that they were born into. They see society as an independent construct that was formed by impersonal forces. Marx and Engels thought that these forces were economic with the “means of porduction”. Socialists are sceptics that humans can be the master of their own destiny. Socialists believe that were there is improvement for humans there is also improvement for society. Socialists argue that an individuals status is shaped by the social class that they were born into. Marx and Engels, along with people like Crosland noted that these classes can be unequal.
Socialists believe in the equality of outcome in society, they want to narrow the gap between the rich and poor, they believe that just aiding the poor will not seek equality.
how do socialists view the economy?
Socialists believe that private property and capitalism can be problematic, which is why common ownership is preferred. Free-market capitalism causes inequality within society. Socialists seek to change this by providing greater worker control in employment and redistribution of wealth.
This will involve the rejection of laissez faire capitalism
They will also demand greater collectivism.
what are the forms that economic collectivism can take?
progressive taxation
progressive public spending- state benefits to the elderly
Extensive public services- such as NHS
Extensive state regulation of capitalism- a minimum wage and equal pay legislation
state/common ownership- this was displayed by the original Clause 4 of the Labour Party, which was supported by people such as Beatrice Webb, this was evidence of their belief in common ownership
these are a way to promote the fraternal beliefs of socialism,
what did Marx and Engels argue was the value of a collectivist society?
This will be more stable and provide the needs of people, they believe that capitalism and market forces are inherently volatile and unpredictable.
how do socialists view the state?
Socialists believe in a strong state, which makes them different from anarchism. They believe that without a strong state it will be impossible to bring about a fair society.
Marxists believe that the state would eventually wither away, and Marx would call this “the end of history”
Though, all socialists believe that in the short term a strong state is essential
Socialism rejects the monarchial state and the aristocratic state
Socialists believe in a state where the political and economic power of a state has been redistributed. And where decision making reflects “the people”
Socialists also believe that the state must be an extensive one
what do fundamental socialists believe?
they all believe that capitalism and some stage must be abolished, though how it should be abolished differs
classical marxism
This is the writing of Karl Marx, Marx and Engels believe that capitalism must be abolished and then communism could be established
The oppression of one class against another is against socialism.
They believed that history was a series of stages, they believe that history was a bunch of economic stages that can be termed historical materialism.
They believed that capitalism was historically doomed as there would always be one class that would be economically dominant.
Their philosophy was also shaped by their belief in revolution ,they believed that it was necessary to “smash” capitalism by violent force
They believed that countries such as the USA and UK were servants of economic policy that encouraged capitalism
the pair believed that a new state and economy could be achieved by revolution
marxism- leninism
Lenin disputed Marx that revolution could occur only in countries where capitalism and the working class were well developed. Luxembourg agreed with Lenin, this was seen as small countries would have to endure many more years of oppressive rule.
Lenin believe that revolution should help to cause a socialist state, Luxembourg party agreed with the ideas of Lenin, but only as far as under-developed societies.
She was concerned that the ideas of Lenin could make revolutionary socialism irrelevant
key thinkers Marx and Engels
they were the first socialist thinkers to offer fulsome analysis of how humans were social and economic beings, they argued that human nature had been contaminated by capitalism, which encouraged greed. They believed that capitalism had installed a “false consciousness” in society
They explained the centrality of the social class- they argued that capitalism created the working class and middle class. They argued that these class differences were not harmonious and involved harsh inequalities of wealth- they also believed that capitalist societies were unstable.
They rejected the view that capitalism creates prosperity
They did not believe that the state was politically neutral, they argued that the state would always serve the interests of whoever was in charge.
they would explain that revolution was not just inevitable but essential, in the wake of revolution a new state would arise. Though, their argument did give head to the USSR and the china of Mao.
what was democratic centralism?
this is where there would be one party and within that one party there would be open discussion- Luxembourg disagreed with such a concept
Key thinker- Luxembourg
she sought to develop the idea of Marx, she agreed with Marx that capitalism promoted exploitation and was at odds with humanities natural, fraternal instincts, she also agreed that only through revolution could real change be made, though how this should take place would be different.
She rejected the claim of Lenin that revolution can only occur by planning and leadership of the elite. Rather, she believed that a revolution could occur “spontaneously” after class consciousness had been brought about by working class growing battle for progress. Mass strike action would develop, would overthrow the capitalist state
She did agree with internationalism, which is the internationally united working class.
she did not believe in war
conventional marxists and lenses were appalled by L’s belief that the KPD should contest elections to the post-war German constituent; went against evolutionary socialism.
is marxism redundant?
YES:
recent history has marked the end of communism
collapse of USSR
failure of marxist principles in countries
capitalism has not imploded as Marx forecast, its reach has become wider
in advance capitalist states the working class have not risen to revolution.
NO:
capitalism remains unstable and volatile
capitalism does continue to ignite poverty
there has been a “disappointing” record of socialist governments in capitalist states
what is democratic socialism?
emerged during late 19th century, developed with people such as Corbyn
Early democratic socialism
This is seen with Beatrice Webb and was furthered by the original clause 4 of the Labour Party
Though she did reject “big bang” evolutionary change, she argued that revolutions were chaotic
Webb believed that capitalism was volatile and that there needs to be look forward towards a more planned society
they believed that the extension of the suffrage would help to ignite a post-capitalist society
They believed that a democratically elected socialists governments would help to steadily transform society
“the inevitability of gradualism”
the socialist parties would campaign peacefully and would win the trust of the electorate and elect socialist governments.
change from private- state ownership
key thinker Beatrice Webb
she had 4 key principles:
capitalism was the principle cause of crippling poverty
neither paternalism nor philanthropy was a way to deal with the matter
trade unionism and state intervention would be a way to irradiate poverty
effective reform tends to be gradual rather than revolutionary
involved in drafting Clause 4
served on a royal commission that examined the states approach to poverty. Her views help to create the welfare state.
later democratic socialism
the UK’s post-war Labour government is seen as evidence democratic socialism
The government of Attlee, introduction of welfare state and state ownership of key industries.
Though the failings of the 1970s some saw as the inevitable punishment awaiting any socialist government
How did Benn argue that fundamentalist socialism can be pursued peacefully?
He argued that key adjustments would need to be made
restoration of parliamentary sovreignity and the withdrawal from the EEC.
Parliamentary reform such as the abolition of the House of Lords.
Greater support from trade unions
what is the significance of Euro-communism?
this is the belief that capitalism can be gradually de-comissioned via parliamentary methods and evolutionary socialism
Groups such as the French Communist Party rejected the marxist-lenin case for revolution
They believed that the existing “liberal-bourgeois” state could accommodate meaningful socialist change
they rejected the dictatorship of the working class
must socialism involve the abolition of private property and capitalism
YES- according to fundamental socialists
the core value of socialism is equality which private property does not generate
also goes against the key values of fraternity and cooperation
marx, engels and Luxemburg believed that private propert led to the exploitation and oppression of working people.
Beatrice Webb believed that public ownership was more rational than private ownership
must socialism involve the abolition of private property and capitalism
No- according to revisionist socialists
the debate of public/private ownership concerns the means and not the end of socialism
some did note that working class conditions had improved under capitalism
Crosland believed that increased public spending, not ownership was the key to more socialism
the significance of social democracy?
The change in the term from the hostility of capitalism and even a belief in revolution came after the war
Crosland argued for Keynesian economics- where the state had sought to “manage” market forces
Crosland believed that with Keynesian economics capitalism was no longer vulnerable, argued that socialism wasnt just “common ownership”