U.S. Colombian Policy Flashcards
history of 2-party rule between
liberals and conservatists (did not get along)
divided liberal party led to
radical constitutional changes that allowed conservs party to win in 1856.
U.S. more on line with liberals and framed
the constitution
Six civil wares in the 19th century leading to
conservatives ruling from 1850 to 1930.
liberal party finally takes over in
1930s Great Depression
Libs want states to play an active role in
weddings, divorce, education
all of this was mainly under the church
La Violencia
brutal civil war with 140,000 deaths
breakdown oligarchic democracy
divided liberal party
End of La Violencia
Military takes over after brutal 4 year civil war
Military takeover exposes
their corruption, showing civilians they dont want to go back to military rule. United in terms of hating the military.
National Front - Bipartisan Rule (1958-1974/86)
solution after taking military + Rojas
The lack of allowance for new political parties lead to
Guerrillas + FARC, who would revolt against the system
viewing them as sterile elections - lower vote turnout
Pros of National Front - Bipartisan Rule (1958-1974/86)
Rapid modernization, better economically, growth of state (World Back & Alliance for Progress), migration from rural to cities, economic diversification (minimal ISI policies)
Cons of National Front - Bipartisan Rule (1958-1974/86)
low political turnout + lack of policy innovation. difficult to compromise to reach 2/3 vote requirement
Guerrilla movements (esp FARC)
civil war in 1960s between gov and guerillas
with a role for drugs
U.S. & Columbia: Evolution of Policy
Teddy Roosevelt blocks Columbian troops from getting into Panama, supporting the revolt for independence in Panama bc Columbia would not ratify the treaty to build the Panama Canal.
Thomson - Urrutia Treaty 1921
Gift from US to Columbia to mend fences for taking control of canal