Up to Exam 2 Flashcards
The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli
Father of Modern Political Theory
Born: Florence may 3rd 1496 died June 21 1527 in Florence also
Political philosopher statesmen secretary of the Florence republic
Family was wealthy and prominent
Father: Bernado. Was a lawyer but was barred from public office in Florence because of debt
At 29, he became head of the second Chancery, a post that placed him in charge of the Republic’s foreign affairs in subject territories (held until 1512)
During his tenure at the second chancery, Machiavelli persuaded Soderini to reduce the city’s reliance on mercenary forces by establishing a militia (1505)
saved the country a lot of money
Faked his own death
What was Machiavelli’s dedication of the Prince
a letter to Lorenzo de medici, who was the nephew of Giovnabni de’ Medici and became duke of Urbino in 1516. Machiavelli offers his book with customary humility, commenting that it is stylistically simple and unworthy of his audience. Machiavelli describes his book as a dummy of his “understanding the deeds of great men” intended to help Lorenzo de’ Medici achieve eminence as a prince.
ordinary citizen’s perspective according to M
offers a short defense of why he, an ordinary citizen, should know more than rulers about the art of ruling. He uses a metaphor to justify himself: a person standing on a mountain is best positions to survey the landscape the mountain.
To comprehend fully the nature of people, one must be a prince, and to comprehend fully the nature of princes, one must be an ordinary.
The removed perspective of an observer is a more reliable guide than practical experience, and a better mean of improving the art of ruling
the citizen that is removed has a better perspective on how one should rule.
What was the purpose of the prince?
though the book has a scholarly tone, it is not for fellow scholars. A practical how to guide for aspiring princes.
Chapter 1 the Prince
how many kinds of states are there? how many types of principality are there? how are they acquired?
Describes the different kinds of states, arguing all states are either republics or principalities.
Principalities can be decided into hereditary principalities or new principalities.
New principalities are either completely new or new appendages to existing states.
It is by fortune or strength, a prince can acquire a new principality with hi own army or with the arms of others
Chapter 2 The Prince
intro
first of three chapters focusing on methods to govern and maintain principalities. dismisses any discussion of republics, explaining that he has “discussed them at length on another occasion”
Chapter 2 The Prince
on Hereditary Principalities
Notes that it is easier to govern a hereditary state than a new principality for two main reasons.
First, those under the rule of such states are familiar with he prince’s family and are therefore accustomed to their rule. The natural prince only has to keep past institutions intact, while adapting these institutions to current events.
Second, the natural disposition of subjects in a hereditary state is to love the ruling family, unless the prince commits some horrible act against his people.
Even if a strong outsider succeeds in conquering a prince’s hereditary state, and setback the outsider encounters will allow the prince to reconquer the state.
Chapter 3 the prince
On Mixed Principalities
why is maintaining a new principality more difficult than maintaining a hereditary state?
explains why maintaining a new principality is more difficult than maintaining a hereditary state.
people will willingly trade one recently arrived ruler for another, hoping that a new ruler will be better than the present one.
this expectation of improvement will induce people to take up arms against any relatively unestablished prince. Although the people may quickly realize that their revolt is ineffective, they will still create great disorder.
Incumbants
Chapter 3 the Prince
honeymoon period and its constitutes
when a prince takes over another prince’s domain, he finds himself in a tricky situation with regard to the people who put him In power.
He cannot maintain the support of these people because he cannot fulfill all of their expectations that their situation will improve.
But he also cannot deal too harshly with them because he is in their debt. Immediately after taking power, the prince is in danger of losing his newly gained principality.
Chapter 3 the Prince
revolt
when a price successfully suppresses a revolt, however, the ruler can easily prevent further revolt by harshly punishing the rebels and decimating his opposition.
treat the revolters as harshly as he can.
The ruler can deal more harshly with his subjects in response to the revolt than he would be able to normally.
Chapter 3 The Prince
maintaining control of a new principality
It is much easier to maintain control over a new principality if the people shred’s the same language and customs as the prince’s own country.
If this is the case, the prince has to do only two things: Destroy the family of the former prince, and maintain the principality’s laws and taxes. People will leave quietly and peacefully so long as their old ways of life are undisturbed.
Chapter 3 The Prince
living in the state
language and cutstoms
new states have different languages and customs from those of the prince are more difficult to maintain. One of the prince’s most effective options is to take up residence in the new state.
By living there, the prince can address problems quickly and efficiently. He can prevent the local officials from plundering his territory. The subjects will be in close contact with the prince.
Therefore those who are inclined to be good will have more reason to show their allegiance to the prince and those who are inclined to be bad will have more reason to fear him. Invaders will think twice before attempting to take over the state.
Chapter 3
colonies, pampered or crushed, military bases
another effective method of dealing with linguistic and cultural differences: less expensive to establish colonies in the new state than military occupation
stop worrying about poor people
men must either be pampered or crushed. a prince should injure people only if he knows there is no threat of revenge.
military bases throughout the state will not keep order, instead, just piss off the people
Chapter 3
neighboring states
A prince who has occupied a state in a foreign country should dominate the neighboring states. He should weaken the strong ones and ensure that Ono other strong foreign power invades a neighboring state.
Weaker powers will naturally side with the strongest power as long as they cannot grow strong themselves. The prince must remain master of the whole country to keep control of the state he has conquered.
Chapter 3
princes should do what about problems in the state
what is mans natural want?
PRINCES SHOULD ALWAYS ACT TO SOLVE PROBLEMS BEFORE PROBLEMS FULLY MANIFEST THEMSELVES. Political disorders are easy to solve if the prince identifies the and acts early. If they are allowed to develop fully, it will be too late.
men naturally was to acquire more. when they succeed in acquiring more they are always praised not condemned. But rulers who lack the ability to acquire, yet still try at the cost of their current state, should be condemned
chapter 4
Why the kingdom of Darius, which Alexander Occupied, did not rebel against his successors after Alexander’s death
2 ways to govern a principality.
The first is a prince and appointed ministers. while the ministers help govern, everyone remains subservient to the prince.
The second way involves the prince and nobles. Nobles are not appointed by the Prince, but they benefit from their ancient lineage and have subjects of their own.
Of both these scenarios, the prince is regarded as being much stronger if he uses ministers, since he is the only ruler in the country
chapter 4
nobles vs ministers
It is much harder to take over a country if a prince uses ministers because ministers have little incentive to be corrupted by foreign powers or to turn on their prince. Furthermore, even if they were to turn against the prince, they would not be able to muster support from any subjects because they hold no persona loyalties. It is easier to conquer a country governed with the cooperation of nobles, because finding a discontented noble eager for change is always possible. Moreover, nobles command the loyalty of their own subjects, so a corrupted noble will corrupt the support of his subjects.
Chapter 4
contd.
although it is easier to take over a state ruled by nobles, it is much harder to maintain control of that state. In a state ruled by nobles, it is not enough to kill the former ruler’s family, because the nobles will still be around to revolt. Holding onto a state with ministers is much easier, because it merely requires killing off the one prince and his family.
Chapter 4
Machiavelli asserts that the rules he proposes are consistent with historical evidence, such as Alexander’s successful conquest of Asia and the rebellions agains the Romans in Spain, France and Greece.
One must look at the way other countries approached a situation.
summary
the first step in his argument is to establish the terms and categories that he will use to make sense out of the multitude of different political situations that exist in the real world. The clear-cut distinctions Machiavelli makes between different kind of states, beginning with principalities and republics- are very effective insofar as they enable him to present his ideas clearly and concisely. Whether his categories do justice to the complexity of political history isa different question. Machiavelli creates an impression of directness and practicality by presenting the world in simple, clear defined terms.
Chapter 5
How you should govern cities or kingdoms before you acquire them, lived under their own laws
THREE WAYS
Machiavelli describes three ways to hold states that have been accustomed to living freely under their own laws.
The first is to devastate them.
The second is for the conqueror to occupy them.
The third is to allow the state to maintain its own laws, but to charge taxes and establish an oligarchy to keep the state friendly.
the third option is advantageous because the newly imposed oligarchy will work hard to secure the authority of the conquering prince within the conquered state because it owes its existence to the prince and cannot survive without his support. Thus, as long as the goal is not to devastate the other state, it is easiest to rule it through the use of its own citizens
It is very important to allow people to keep their own rules
Chapter 5
in states that have been free in the past (republics)
complete destruction is the most certain way of securing a state that has been free in the past. A prince who does not take this route places himself in a position to be destroyed himself. No matter how long it has been since the state was acquired, rebellions will always revive the legacy of ancient institutions and notions of former liberty, even if the state has benefited from the prince’s rule. This sense of tradition will unify the people against the prince.
Chapter 5
Accustomed to being ruled
On the other hand, cities or provinces that are accustomed to being ruled by a prince are easy to take over once the ruling family has been destroyed. People ins such states are accustomed to obedience and do not know how to live in freedom without having someone to rule over them.
Chapter 5
in republics
in republics (or former republics, sentiments of hatred and revenge against the conquering prince will run strong. the memories of ancient liberty never die, so a prince will be better off destroying the republic or personally occupying the conquered state
President trump coming in after president Obama