univariate and multivariate Flashcards
3 main approaches for univariate
- Pure premium: calc PP for each level of RV and then divide by base level or overall PP to get indicated relativities
- Loss ratio: calc LR for each level of RV then divide by base level or overall LR to get indicated relativities
- Adjusted pure premium: adjust exposures by weighted average current relativity from other RVs and then use PPA using adjusted exposures
main distortion in PPA
-main distortion in PPA=assumes no correlation between exposures for different RVs (distributional bias)
distributional bias
if exposures of RV are correlated with exposures of the levels of another RV, then approach will double count experience of those levels
why is LRA improvement over PPA
because it attempts to correct for distributional bias -> uses premium instead of exposures and prem reflect higher levels of prem obtained within class as result of correlation with other higher rated levels of other RVs
problem with APPA
calc weighted average relativities can be cumbersome in a rating plan with many variables
adjustments before applying univariate approaches
- large events and anomalies: large losses and CAT should be removed and possibly replaced with some sort of longer-term loading
- one-time changes: class data should be adjusted for all past one-time changes
- continuous changes: trending of prem and loss is often ignored since common assumption=all classes are trending at same rate
- development: often ignored since common assumption=all classes are developing at the same rate
- expenses and profit: assumed to not vary by class so analysis often done using reported loss and sometimes ALAE; if FEs are material and separate expense fee is not using in rating algorithm, then relativities should be adjusted for FEs
- credibility: individual classes have less data, they are less credible, so credibility weighting becomes more important
credibility with PPA
credibility is applied to indicated relativity to total (compliment is normalized relativity = current relativity/total current relativity)
credibility with LRA
credibility is applied to rel change factor (compliment is no change aka change factor of 1)
problem with univariate approaches
- univariate does not properly account for impact of correlated variables
- many variables in insurance are correlated
multivariate analysis incorporates
impact of multiple variables simultaneously
why have GLMs grown in popularity
as result of increased computing power, better data availability, and competitive pressure to avoid adverse selection
benefits of GLMs
Properly adjust for exposure correlations btw RVs
Attempt to focus on signal and ignore noise in data
Provide statistical diagnostics like CIs
Allows for consideration of interactions btw RVs
exposure correlation
relationship btw 2 exposures of 2 or more RVs
response correlation
when effect of 1 variable varies based on levels of another variable
minimium bias procedure
- iterative univariate methods that properly adjust for exposure correlation
- set total reported loss&ALAE for group = total prem you would obtain form that group with indicated relativities, ex:
total loss for t1=curr base rate*t1*sum(exposuresi *ci)
-start with seed values (based on univariate analysis) of class relativities and solve for territory relativities and repeat until convergence