implementation Flashcards

1
Q

Calculating new rates for existing product

A
  • select target overall avg prem or RC
  • finalize rating algorithm
  • select final new rates for each RV
  • select final additive amounts
  • derive final base rate needed to achieve target prem
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Expense Fees

A
  • premium can be split into multiplicative and additive portions of rating algorithm
  • multiplicative = base rate and all RVs
  • additive = fixed expense fee
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

fixed expense fee per exposure

A

fixed expense per exposure/(1-V-Q)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

deriving new base rate without rating factor changes

A
  • can simply change base rate
  • need to decide whether to change additive component or not

proposed BR = curr BR * (prop avg prem - prop add fee)/(curr avg prem - curr add fee)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

deriving new base rate with rating factor changes

A
  1. EoE
  2. Approximated average rate differential
  3. Approximated change in average rate differential
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

EoE

A
  • rerate all policies using all new rates and seed base rate then calc new base rate
  • most accurate but requires detailed data and calculations

prop BR = seed BR * (prop avg prem - prop add fee)/(avg prem with see & new rate - prop add fee)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Approximated average rate differential

A
  • calc proposed exposure-weighted avg rating factor then calc new base rate
  • approximated by calc exposure weighted avg new rating factor for each RV and multiply them together
  • less accurate since it ignores distributional bias between RVs
  • can make more accurate by weighting by current variable prem at base levels

prop BR = (prop avg prem - prop add fee)/prop avg rating factor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Approximated change in average rate differential

A
  • calc change in average rating factor instead of calculating factor directly and take inverse of this to get off-balance factor
  • approximated by calc off-balance factor for each RV for which we are changing rates and mult together to get total off-balance
  • less accurate than EoE
  • takes less time since looking at only RVs that are changing

prop BR = curr BR * (prop avg prem - prop add fee)/(curr avg prem - curr add fee) *OBF

-can make more accurate by weighting by current variable prem at base levels

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

OBF

A

OBF=Πexposure weighted current rel i/Πexposure weighted proposed rel i

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

change in exposure-weighted avg relativity

A

change in exposure-weighted avg relativity = exposure weighted proposed/exposure weighted current-1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

minimum premiums

A

-used to make prem for individual policy will cover expected fixed expenses and some minimal amount of expected losses

effect = (prem with min/prem without min)-1

-to approx. offset this prem impact, multiple BR by offset factor

BR offset = 1/(1+offset)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

rate capping: non-base level

A
  • lower factor for that level and then increasing BR to makeup for lost premium, then readjust factor for capped level downwards due to BR increase in order to maintain same capped amount
  • relatibity adjustment is only for level being capped
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

rate capping: base level

A
  • lower base rate and then increasing factors for other levels to makeup for lost premium -> increase in other factors will have to make up for prem lost from cap and prem reduction from base rate decrease
  • calc relativities for each non-base level using final rel adj (BL will remain at 1)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

rate capping for 1 variable

A

-if want to cap impact of RC for single variable, need to make up any premium loss resulting from cap on other levels of variable to obtain same overall target prem

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Expected Distribution used for RCs

A

-usually RCs are measures on impact to in-force OLP, if RCs result in change in MOB, it can alter total prem or profitability if profit varies by class

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

using competitor rates: adjusting competitor expense fee

A

FE: subject FE per exposure/competitor FE per exposure

17
Q

using competitor rates: adjusting competitor BR and expense fee

A

VE: Competitor VPLR/subject VPLR

18
Q

using competitor rates: adjusting BR

A

LCs: subject expected LC/competitor LC

19
Q

shortcut for OBF

A

OBF = indicated chaenge factor for base level (using LRA)