Unit A6 Questions Ollie Flashcards

1
Q

Q1
(a) Explain the objectives of:

(i) active health and safety monitoring; (5)
(ii) reactive health and safety monitoring. (4)
(b) Outline a range of active health and safety monitoring methods. (5)

(c) Outline examples of reactive performance data that could be used to benchmark health and safety
performance. (6)

A

(a) (i)Active / Proactive monitoring systems are to ensure that health and safety standards are correct in the workplace before accidents, incidents or incidents of ill-health occur.
(ii) Reactive Monitoring measures previous failure in performance, highlighting areas of concern and enabling an organisation to learn from mistakes.

(b)Active Monitoring includes:
• Physical inspection of work place to identify hazards and unsafe conditions
• Safety audits where the systematic critical examination of all aspects of an organisation’s H&S
performance against stated objectives is carried out.
• Safety sampling of a specific area or particular items of plant with repeated sampling to observe the
trends.
• Safety surveys involving in depth examinations of specific issues or procedures such as changes in
work procedures
• Safety climate survey results can be an excellent indicator of culture and survey can be designed and
tailored specifically to measure culture
• Measuring of environmental conditions such as dust levels in the workplace

(c)Reactive Monitoring includes:
• Accident rates, measuring the number of accidents over a certain time period
• Sickness reports which provides information about work related conditions and issues that affect health
• Near-miss and dangerous occurrence reports which provide details of events that point to root causes
common to accidents and point to failures in control measures.
• Measurement of Enforcement action which relate to specific breaches of the law and the need for the
improvements in health and safety
• Measurement of the number of civil claims made pointing to areas where improvement is necessary.
• Complaints from the workforce

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

An organisation is due to have an external certification audit of its health and safety management system against a recognised standard. The information from the audit will be used in a formal review of health and safety performance.

(a) Outline the purpose of health and safety management system auditing. (4)
(b) Describe the in-house safety practitioner’s role in this external audit. (6)
(c) Outline the purpose of a health and safety management performance review. (2)

(d)
(i) Outline possible inputs to the health and safety management performance review. (6)

(ii) Outline possible outputs from the health and safety management performance review. (2)

A

(a)The purpose of an audit is to
Identify areas of Legal non compliance
Assess the quality & implementation of the safety policy
Identify potential risks and associated control measures
Analyse workplace activities and assess if they are being carried out safely Test the reliability and effectiveness of procedures and systems
Assist in the allocation of resources
Assist in the continual improvement of H&S performance

(b)In house H&S practitioner’s role:
• To ensure that the external auditor has access to any documentation requested.
• Organise interviews with key staff
• Brief staff beforehand•
Relevant senior management is available for the kick off and close out meeting.
Advise auditor on activities taking place and control systems in use

(c) Purpose of review:
• To see whether the health and safety management system is working as intended
• Identify systems requiring change
• To keep employees at all levels motivated in order to improve health and safety performance.

(d) Inputs to review:
• Evaluation of compliance with legal and organisational requirements
• Any developments in legal requirements or best practice within the industry
• Communications from enforcing authorities and insurers
• Whether health and safety objectives have been met
• Whether actions from previous reviews have been completed.
• Any Changes in organisation or processes
• Audit, inspection results and implementation
• Output and Effectiveness of consultation and internal communications
• Incident data, recommendations and action plans from investigations
• Absences and sickness records and their analysis
• Complaints from neighbours, customers and the public.

(e) Outputs from review
• SMART actions to address any weaknesses and system to monitor implementation
• New performance targets
• Report to key stakeholders eg shareholders, employee groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Health and safety performance objectives are being reviewed at an annual senior management meeting.
Outline what should be considered when setting health and safety performance objectives. (10)

A

Consideration should be given to
• Any legislative requirements that apply
• Company standards or priorities of the company/business
• Who should be involved in setting the objectives, and their level of knowledge and experience?
• Should they top down (Company to site) or bottom up (Site to Company)
• Any there any industry benchmarks?
• How will performance be measured?
• Over what timescales would they be set and reviewed – short term v’s long term
• Financial constraints on improvement measures
• Availability of trained personnel/requirements for further training

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

(a) Outline the purpose of health and safety management auditing. (4)

(b) Describe factors that should be considered when planning an audit programme. (12)
You do not need to consider specific factors to be audited.

(c) Outline how senior managers can assist in the auditing process. (4)

A

(a)The purpose of an audit is to
• Identify areas of Legal non compliance
• Assess the quality & implementation of the safety policy
• Identify potential risks and associated control measures
• Analyse workplace activities and assess if they are being carried out safely
• Test the reliability and effectiveness of procedures and systems
• Assist in the allocation of resources
• Assist in the continual improvement of H&S performance

(b)Factors to consider:
• Selection of the audit team and audit leader with the appropriate range of skills and competence;
• Definition of the extent / scope of audit – Will it cover entire H&S management system or just particular
aspects?
• Any specific activities/processes that need to be covered (possibly as a result of previous audit findings)
• Developing documentation – Audit protocol or questionnaires etc;
• Obtaining permission and support of management / staff in order to get the most out of the audit
• Allocation of resources; Agree timescales and timetable for audit
• Identification of key personnel for interview
• Arranging appointments for interviews with key personnel – (dates/times if possible)
• Establishing the best means of feedback – how will findings be reported – at end of audit and/or via
report/presentation
• What pre-audit information will be required/be useful – to build up knowledge about the organisation and
services before audit begins

(c)Senior managers can assist by:
• Informing staff and encouraging their cooperation
• Participating in the audit themselves
• Provide necessary resources are available such as documents, records, interview room
• Ensure relevant staff are available for interview
• For internal audits, the senior management may be involved in appointing the auditing team
• Provide necessary training required for audit team
• Ensuring that any actions from the audit are implemented in a timely manner

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

An organisation uses accident, incident and ill-health data to assess its health and safety performance. A campaign to raise health and safety awareness has been recently introduced. No change in health and safety performance has been noted.

(a) Outline why it appears that the campaign is ineffective. (4)
(b) Outline the objectives of active monitoring. (8)

A

(a) The ineffective campaign outcomes:
Lack of commitment and engagement from senior management
Lack of resources by the organisation and senior management
Lack of incident and accident reporting
Employee morale is low in the workplace

(b)Active Monitoring includes:
• Physical inspection of work place to identify hazards and unsafe conditions
• Safety audits where the systematic critical examination of all aspects of an organisation’s H&S
performance against stated objectives is carried out.
• Safety sampling of a specific area or particular items of plant with repeated sampling to observe the
trends.
• Safety surveys involving in depth examinations of specific issues or procedures such as changes in
work procedures
• Safety climate survey results can be an excellent indicator of culture and survey can be designed and
tailored specifically to measure culture
• Measuring of environmental conditions such as dust levels in the workplace

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Outline how the following active monitoring techniques can be used to assess the organisation’s health and safety performance:

(i) safety tours; (2)

A

A safety tour is a brief (usually 15-20 minutes) walk around a work area, by the responsible manager (or sometimes management team, looking at one or more aspects of the work areas activities (for example: checking PTW compliance.).
The main purpose of a safety tour is to demonstrate management commitment to OHS.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

(ii) safety sampling; (2)

A

Safety sampling is a technique performed in a workplace that is used to measure the potential for accidents. It can be performed by supervisors, workforce representatives or OHS personnel.
The defects that are spotted are noted and the total number of defects is added up to give an index of accident potential. You will appreciate that both trivial and major defects will register the same.
It is usually a timed activity over a nominated route and is repeated periodically to determine improvement or deterioration.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

(v) Safety Surveys(2)

A

Involves a detailed investigation of a specific aspect of the workplace when, for example, an OHS inspection has shown a possible hazard that needs analysis.
(For example a perceived high level of noise in an area during an inspection, which needs detailed measurement and analysis.).
The purpose of the survey is to determine whether there is a hazardous situation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

iv) safety audits. (2)

A

The audit will generally start with a meeting between the audit team and the organisation management. This will confirm the scope of the audit, timings and feedback mechanisms. The audit team will then start to collect evidence on which to base its findings. This is usually done by:

Examination of documents and records.
Interviewing personnel (a cross section).
Observation of the activities and workplace conditions.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

General Inspection.

A

This involves a walk around the workplace, often using an appropriate checklist, to identify poorly controlled hazards associated with the workplace itself, equipment, or activities being undertaken (for example poor housekeeping; inadequately guarded machinery; non-use of PPE; blocked fire exits; compliance with an OHS procedure or permit to work.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Benchmarking.

A

Health, Safety and Environmental Protection Benchmarking is a planned process by which an organisation compares its health and safety processes and performance with others to learn how to:
Reduce the incidence of injury and ill-health.
Improve environmental protection and sustainability measures.
Improve compliance with regulations.
Reduce health and safety-related costs.
Enhance Company reputation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Benchmarking.

A

Health, Safety and Environmental Protection Benchmarking is a planned process by which an organisation compares its health and safety processes and performance with others to learn how to:
Reduce the incidence of injury and ill-health.
Improve environmental protection and sustainability measures. Improve compliance with regulations.
Reduce health and safety-related costs.
Enhance Company reputation.

Benefits of Benchmarking include:
Improved health and safety performance.
Reduced injury/ill health costs.
Reduced incident response costs.
Improved reputation (held in high regard by public and industry). Striving to be “best in class”
Lower insurance costs.
Avoid “reinventing the wheel” - learn from others, pick up on “best practices”.
Motivated workforce - increased productivity; less turnover of staff.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

The senior managers at your workplace participate in formal annual reviews of health and safety performance as part of the health and safety management system.

Outline the types of information that should form the inputs to this review process. (10)

A

Inputs to review:
• Evaluation of compliance with legal and organisational requirements
• Any developments in legal requirements or best practice within the industry
• Communications from enforcing authorities and insurers
• Whether health and safety objectives have been met
• Whether actions from previous reviews have been completed.
• Any Changes in organisation or processes
• Audit, inspection results and implementation
• Output and Effectiveness of consultation and internal communications
• Incident data, recommendations and action plans from investigations
• Absences and sickness records and their analysis
• Complaints from neighbours, customers and the public.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

(a) Outline the strengths of using accident rates as a measure of health and safety performance (3)
(b) Outline the weaknesses of using accident rates as a measure of health and safety performance (7)

A

(a) Strengths;
Measurable number with defined criteria, easy to plot a trend, benchmark data may be available, represents categories of loss events which have actually happened, and which are undesirable.

(b) Weaknesses:
Historic measure of performance / cannot predict future performance; measures previous not current safety measures effectiveness in the short term; subject to random fluctuations / number of accidents often too small to be used as reliable performance indicators; accidents may not be reported / recorded / disclosed; absence of accidents does not necessarily indicate that procedures are safe; does not measure actual or potential severity of accident; unable to identify high consequence, low probability risk; does not reflect chronic health issues; affected by propensity to take time off / morale; other near misses / minor accidents / incidents are not included; different definitions of ‘accident’ / different treatment of part-time workers / contractors may make data and / orcomparisons invalid.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

An organisation employs 900 people at a warehousing and distribution site. The site manager has asked for a set of summary information to be provided each month for its executive meetings in order to monitor the overall health and safety performance of the site.

Outline the possible contents of that set of information. (10)

A

The information set should contain both reactive and active (proactive) data:

Reactive performance indicators include: numbers of accidents / ill-health / sickness absence / absenteeism / staff turnover / near-misses / numbers of RIDDOR reportables - accidents, ill-health and DOs; levels of litigation/ enforcement action - INs / PNs / PRs; civil claims; amount of property damage; responses to staff surveys / questionnaires – levels of (dis)satisfaction.
Data should be presented as raw totals and also as rates - LTA rate, frequency, incidence rates etc. Data should be presented to show patterns and trends over time etc.
Data should be provided as site totals and also per department / activity / shift; results of staff surveys / questionnaires - satisfaction levels;

Active performance indicators include: summary results of H&S audit data; numbers and outcomes of workplace inspections; numbers of actions outstanding; summary of behavioural observation / job safety (task) analysis outcomes; health surveillance data / records; results of atmospheric / environmental monitoring; - air; noise etc; competence levels - H&S training records / outcomes / feedback; efficiency / productivity improvements; tenders won where H&S standards / performance was a factor; level of maintenance carried out; improved image of company; budget / resources allocated; benchmarking data - comparisons with industry sector average etc; progress in meeting H&S targets; levels of hazard reporting; safety climate / survey results - better industrial relations - extent of liaison / co-operation between staff & managers
(+ example in each case)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Outline the issues that should be considered when planning a health and safety inspection programme. (10)

[Information on the specific workplace conditions or behaviours that might be covered in an inspection is not required.]

A

Issues to consider in planning the inspection include: need to define aims / objectives; who is to be involved - competence and composition of the inspection team - the need for a range of expertise / experience; what is to be covered - the scope of the inspection programme - machinery / equipment / welfare / documentation / behavioural issues etc ; where the inspecton will take place - area(s) to be covered; when the inspection will occur - timings / frequency / duration - as determined by hazards / level of risk; planned programme or random / unannnounced; timings (peak activity / shifts / shutdown periods etc); development of inspection documentation - format etc; means of recording data - checklists, databases etc; consultation requirements / training and information needs of staff / managers; need to inform managers and secure co-operation / commitment; planning for staff involvement; need for background information / research - previous reports / findings / accident history etc; PPE requirements; costs; sanctions and mechanisms of remedial action to be established; arrangements for monitoring / review of outcomes; mechanisms for communicating findings to staff / management.

WHO: Composition & competence requirements of inspection team
WHAT: The range of activities / processes / to be covered by the inspection; employees / contractors
WHEN: The frequency and timing of the inspection to cover shifts, “out-of-hours” maintenance activities / shutdown;
more regular in safety-critical environments; previous data - accident / ill-health records /
trends
WHERE: the sites / locations to be inspected
HOW: the methods of recording data - checklists / observation / scoring / rating
The training needs of the inspection team; the equipment needs of the inspection team - PPE etc; the need for consultation and support / involvement of management / staff - team meetings / briefings / newsletters etc; applicable legal standards (COSHH R 9 LEV); industry standards / requirements of insurers

17
Q

An advertising campaign was used to promote improvement in safety standards within an organisation. During the period of the campaign the rate of reported accidents significantly increased and the campaign was considered to be a failure.

(a) Outline the reasons why the rate of reported accidents may have been a poor measure of the
campaign’s effectiveness. (2)

(b) Outline FOUR proactive (active) monitoring techniques which might be used to assess the organisation’s health and safety performance. (8)

A

a) The rate of reported accidents may be a poor measure of the campaign’s effectiveness because: the campaign may have simply raised the profile of (a particular category of?) accidents / accident reporting so the increase may just be an increase in reporting not an increase in accidents; there may have been significant under-reporting before the campaign (+ suggestions as to why accidents may have been previously under- reported; accident rates are a “negative” / “reactive” measure of H&S performance and just one indicator among many - they do not necessarily reflect broader standards of H&S performance; accident rates are a “lagging indicator” - even if the campaign has had an effect it may take time to show up in the statistics - rates will not necessarily fall immediately; accident rates fluctuate over time so any increase is not necessarily indicative of a general deterioration in H&S standard; the rate of accidents may not be a valid indicator unless the numbers are statistically significant - in many organisations accident numbers are too small to have statistical validity or to use as a basis for drawing general conclusions about H&S performance - eg a change from 2 accidents per year to 3 per year is a 50% increase but it would be rash to base too much on this - whereas a change from 200 per year to 300 per year (also 50%) is statistically more compelling

(b) Proactive monitoring techniques include: workplace inspection - use of checklists / documentation to
assess levels of compliance;
Safety tour - general unprogrammed / unscheduled review of compliance;
Safety survey - in depth review of a particular issue - eg PPE or machinery guarding;
Safety sampling - inspection of a specific item of plant or a particular area; review of documentation - policy, risk assessments, PTW system - compliance levels; Job Safety Analysis - observation of work activities / behavioural safety assessment etc - compliance;
Safety “climate” analysis - interviews / questionnaire / survey - staff attitudes;
H&S audit is involving review of H&S management system - effectiveness against a “standard” - HSG 65 / ISO 45001; benchmarking against a validated internal or external standard; environmental monitoring;
Health surveillance; measuring of any H&S performance against set targets - amount of training etc (year-on -year figures)
Comment: risk assessment, training, tool box talks, consultation, accident investigation are means of improving safety, not measuring it.

18
Q

As the Health and Safety Adviser to a large organisation, you have decided to develop and introduce an in- house auditing programme to assess the effectiveness of the organisation’s health and safety management arrangements.

Describe the organisational and planning issues to be addressed in the development of the audit programme. (20)

You do not need to consider the specific factors to be audited.

A

Some of the initial strategic issues that would need to be addressed when developing an in-house audit system would be: the logistics of conducting in-house audits - staffing, time etc; the level of available resources and whether additional resources - time, money, expertise, facilities - would be needed; the need to consider whether internal / external (independent) auditors should be used to administer the process; if in-house consider training needs; the need to consult with and obtain support from senior managers and other key stakeholders - staff, Trades Unions, contractors - staff briefings etc
On a more practical level there is a need to: consider the nature of the audit procedure eg full audit - all H&S management issues across entire organisation; horizontal audit - looking at a particular issue eg managing emergencies - across the whole organisation; vertical audit - focussing on H&S management issues in a particular department / section etc; consider the scale / scope of the audit - all issues covered or certain issues targeted - eg policy documentation; frequency of auditing required (relative to levels of risk in the organisation); the standards against which the management arrangements would be audited - internal / external eg BSEN / Trade Association standards / benchmarking against similar organisation in sector etc; the need to identify the key elements of an audit
process (such as planning, interviews, verification, feedback routes, etc); develop audit protocols; consider issues such as need for a system of scoring / rating performance - qualitative / semi-quantitative etc; arrangements for
providing feedback and presentation of the final audit report - eg to staff, managers, the Board etc (need different format / style); identify standards required and set up appropriate remedial actions for unacceptable performance

Comment: question is about audit not workplace inspections; too narrow focus on the HSG65 management system
model - or on a series of specific questions that might be included in the audit protocols - ignoring the organisational and planning issues that are an essential part of the development of an audit programme.

19
Q

(a) Outline how H&S tours could contribute to improving health and safety performance AND to improving health and safety culture within a company. (10) [Discussion of the specific health and safety requirements, problems or standards that such tours may address is not required.]
(b) Outline the issues that should be considered when planning a health and safety inspection programme. (10) [Information on the specific workplace conditions or behaviours that might be covered in an inspection is not required.]

A

(a) Safety tours (active monitoring technique) can improve H&S performance by: highlighting compliance / non- compliance / bad practice; providing opportunities to challenge unsafe actions / conditions; identifying patterns / trends on specific issues (eg PPE use); identify common organisational problems (eg lack of H&S competence); providing opportunities to identify key areas of concern and remedial actions / risk control measures; identify opportunities for improvement; raising awareness of H&S issues; providing checks on implementation / effectiveness of agreed remedial actions; drawing on staff knowledge experience; helping to prioritise actions and resource allocation; driving up standards.
Safety tours can improve H&S culture by: demonstrating organisational / management commitment and leadership (management involvement); produce evidence of improvement; evaluate the impact of interventions / control measures; engaging staff ; enhanced worker participation / ownership; raisingawareness of H&S issues; improving staff & management perception / attitudes / motivation / behaviour; providing opportunities for consultation / communication; driving up standards.

(b) Issues to consider in planning the inspection include: need to define aims / objectives; who is to be involved - competence and composition of the inspection team - the need for a range of expertise / experience; what is to be covered - the scope of the inspection programme - machinery / equipment / welfare / documentation / behavioural issues etc ; where the inspecton will take place - area(s) to be covered; when the inspection will occur - timings / frequency / duration - as determined by hazards / level of risk; planned programme or random / unannnounced; timings (peak activity / shifts / shutdown periods etc); development of inspection documentation - format etc; means of recording data - checklists, databases etc; consultation requirements / training and information needs of staff / managers; need to inform managers and secure co-operation / commitment; planning for staff involvement; need for background information / research - previous reports / findings / accident history etc; PPE requirements; costs; sanctions and mechanisms of remedial action to be established; arrangements for monitoring / review of outcomes; mechanisms for communicating findings to staff / management
WHO: Composition & competence requirements of inspection team
WHAT: The range of activities / processes / to be covered by the inspection; employees / contractors
WHEN: The frequency and timing of the inspection to cover shifts, “out-of-hours” maintenance activities / shutdown;
more regular in safety-critical environments; previous data - accident / ill-health records /
trends WHERE: the sites / locations to be inspected
HOW: the methods of recording data - checklists / observation / scoring / rating
The training needs of the inspection team; the equipment needs of the inspection team - PPE etc; the need for consultation and support / involvement of management / staff - team meetings / briefings / newsletters etc; applicable legal standards (COSHH R 9 LEV); industry standards / requirements of insurers;

20
Q

(a) Explain the purposes and benefits of collecting `near miss’ incident data. (6)

(b) Outline the factors to consider when developing and implementing a system for reporting `near miss’
incidents. (6)

(c) Outline the limitations of using accident / incident data as a means of measuring health and safety
performance (8)

A

(a) A near miss is a potential major injury / fatality - an indication of underlying control failures; collection of data can: identify patterns / trends of non-compliance, inadequate procedures / SSW, shortcomings in H&S management system; identify appropriate control measures / preventive strategies; raise awareness of problem issues / areas; help in targeting resources; improve safety culture

(b) Factors to consider when developing and implementing a `near miss’ reporting system: the need to consider resource issues - financial, time etc; the need for an agreed definition of a NM; need to consult staff on new procedures - gather views / opinions / take account of concerns; need for a pilot / trial period and / or phase-in of the system; information and training needs - competence requirements to implement and administer the new system; need to involve staff - allocate clear roles and responsibilities in relation to NMs; need to develop reporting procedures
- need for documentation to be user-friendly; requirements for keeping records and arrangements for analysis of data; arrangements for investigating NMs; means of providing feedback to staff on investigations and data; arrangements for dealing with issues highlighted and taking remedial action

(c) Limitations include: under-reporting - may not be a true reflection of accident profile; accident data is reactive monitoring =measure of “failure”; only gives a partial picture of H&S performance - needs to be supported by proactive monitoring; accident numbers are subject to random / statistical variation and serious accidents are rare so numbers of accidents provide a poor indicator and poor predictor of future H&S performance; numbers of accidents are often too small to draw statistically valid conclusions as to H&S performance / standards; accident data fails to take account
of NMs (accident potential) and occupational ill-health