Unit A Flashcards

1
Q

Legal criteria that must be satisfied to obtain a conviction under the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007.

A

The organisation may be found guilty of an offence under the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 if:

  • The way in which its activities are managed or organised causes a person’s death and amounts to a gross breach of a relevant duty of care.
  • The organisation’s conduct must have fallen far below the standard of what could have reasonably been expected and a substantial part of the failure within the organisation must have been at a senior management level
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Legal Reason to Manage Health and Safety

PPCS

A

Preventative – Enforcement Notices
Punitive – Fines and Imprisonment (Criminal Courts)
Compensatory – Compensation claims (Civil Courts)
Principles of Self regulation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Strengths of using accident rates as a measure of health and safety performance

A
  • Can be used as a measurable number with defined criteria
  • Provide an easy way of plotting trends and that they represent categories of loss events which have happened, and which are undesirable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

The weaknesses of using accident rates as a measure of health and safety performance.

A
  • Rates give a historic measure but not a prediction of future performance
  • They indicate the effectiveness of previous rather than current safety measures
  • Accidents may not be reported or recorded
  • Number of accidents may often be too small to be used as a statistically reliable performance absence of accidents does not mean that procedures currently in place are safe
  • Rates do not provide a measure of the actual or potential severity of an accident nor do they identify high consequence, low probability risk
  • Minor accidents, near misses and other such incidents are not included
  • Rates do not reflect the presence of any chronic health issues
  • Differences in the interpretation of the word ‘accident’
  • Way in which contractors or part-time workers are treated may make the data and their comparison invalid.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Benefits for effective health and safety management

Benefits / Reasons
B.G.I.I.G.R.G

A
  • Better health and safety performance which will reduce the number of accidents and incidents
  • Greater awareness of legal requirements which will reduce the chances of committing an offence
  • Improved relationships and morale as employees see that their health and safety is being looked after
  • Improved image and positive PR from a publicly responsible attitude towards worker safety
  • Greater business efficiency which will in return reduce costs
  • Reduced insurance premiums by demonstrating better risk control
  • Greater confidence from banks and investors by showing more effective risk management systems
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Reasons for introducing health and safety management systems.

Reasons / Benefits

A
  • Offer a framework for management to focus on in order to manage health and safety and improve the business
  • Better health and safety performance, which will reduce the costs from accidents and incidents
  • Greater awareness of legal requirements, which will reduce the chances of committing an offence.
  • Improved relations and morale as employees see that their health and safety is being looked after.
  • Improved image and positive public relations from a publicly responsible attitude towards employees.
  • Greater business efficiency which will reduce costs.
  • Reduced insurance premiums, by demonstrating more effective risk control.
  • Greater confidence from banks and investors by showing more effective risk management systems.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How might the below might influence health and
safety standards and priorities.

Economic Climate
Government policy
Industry / Business risk profile
Globalisation of business
Migrant workers
Notional level of sickness absence and incapacity
A

Societal factors that influence H&S standards / priorities include:
• Economic climate - austerity, cuts in funding, competition, labour shortages, H&S given lower priority
• Government policy - / priorities / initiatives / campaigns, new legislation introduced – is likely to direct companies’ focus on those areas and distract from others
• Industry / business risk profile – higher risks equate to more controls and vice versa
• Globalisation of business - dealing with different cultures and legislative requirements / standards - Difficulty in establishing a consistent “corporate” system / approach
• Migrant workers - language difficulties, different cultures / attitudes
• National levels of sickness absence and incapacity - government initiatives / legislation – Equality Act e.g. “fit note”, requirements to make reasonable adjustments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Potential sources of financial loss arising from accidents and incidents.

7 costs

A

Safety administration and investigation costs:
• Medical costs
• Cost of lost time of injured employee
• Cost of replacement labour / re training
• Costs of welfare (or other) payments (made by company) to employee
• Cost of lost production / shutdown / investigation time
• Cost of repair/replacement of damaged plant/equipment including both Labour and Materials cost
• Cost of damaged materials / equipment etc.
• Lost business due to damage to reputation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Benefits to the organisation of effective health and safety management.

A

Benefits include:
• Better health and safety performance, which will reduce the costs from accidents and incidents.
• Greater awareness of legal requirements, which will reduce the chances of committing an offence.
• Improved relations and morale as employees see that their health and safety is being looked after
• Improved image and positive public relations from a publicly responsible attitude towards employees.
• Greater business efficiency, which will reduce costs.
• Reduced insurance premiums, by demonstrating more effective risk control.
• Greater confidence from banks and investors from showing more effective risk management systems

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Purpose of Health and Safety Policy in relation to Health and Safety Management

A

Legally required Section 2 (3) HSWA where there are 5 or more employees
• Consist of the statement of intent, organisation, and arrangements sections
• Tells people about a company‘s approach to managing health and safety
• Communicates the organisation’s commitment to health and safety to existing employees
• Describes key roles as regards H&S
• Gives an overview of H&S arrangements, procedures etc
It can be used:
• In the induction of new employees (to stress the importance of safety)
• To involve workforce representatives in writing and amending the policy when necessary.
• At regular briefing sessions to communicate information relating to different sections of the policy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Arrangements for implement a safety policy

A
  • MHSWR 1999 – Regulation 5.
  • (1) Every employer shall make and give effect to such arrangements as are appropriate, having regard to the nature of his activities and the size of his undertaking, for the effective planning, organisation, control, monitoring and review of the preventative and protective measures
  • (2) Where the employer employs five or more employees, he shall record the arrangements referred in paragraph (1)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Benefits of integrated health, safety, and environment management systems

A
  • More cost effective than separate systems and can facilitate decision making that best reflects the overall needs to the organisation
  • Offers the prospect of more rewarding career opportunities for specialists in each discipline
  • Positive culture in one discipline may be carried over to others
  • Objectives and process of management systems are the same
  • Integration should lead to the avoidance of duplication i.e. audits and paperwork etc
  • Increased compatibility from timely overall system reviews
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Advantages of introducing an integrated health, safety, and environment management system

A
  • Likely to operate more cost-effectively than separate systems, and facilitate decision-making that best reflects the overall needs of the organisation
  • Offers the prospect of more rewarding career opportunities for specialists in each discipline
  • The objectives and processes of management systems are essentially the same
  • Integration should lead to the avoidance of duplication
  • Integration should reduce the possibility of resolving problems at the expense of creating new difficulties in other disciplines
  • A positive culture in one discipline may be carried over to others.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Limitations of integrated health, safety, and environment management systems

A
  • Existing systems may already work fine and changing them may affect the coherence and consistency of the current arrangements
  • A negative culture in one topic may be carried over to others
  • A powerful integrated team may reduce ownership of the topics by managers
  • Auditors of single topics may have difficulty evaluating an integrated system due to some parts intertwined and have no relevancy
  • HSE performance underpinned by statute law, quality is more customer requirements
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Advantages of HSG65

A

• A management system model the HSE have championed for years, its simple and straightforward for all types of companies to implement without too much trouble

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Reasons for introducing health and safety management systems

Reasons / Benefits

A
  • Provides a framework for management to focus on the manage health and safety
  • Provides a framework to co-ordinate activities to deliver agreed objectives
  • Ensures appropriate allocation of resources i.e. Financial such as training, plant tool and equipment and manpower
  • Ensures the appropriate allocation of responsibilities to deliver effective health and safety management in the organisation
  • Ensures the setting and monitoring of performance standards to enable the intention of the policy is transferred into action and that shortcomings are identified through monitoring and continuous improvement
  • Ensures feedback and implementation of corrective action this ensures anything fed back to the appropriate people from monitoring and auditing etc is actioned and implemented.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Elements of HSG65

Elements of ISO 45001

A
  • HSG65 – PDCA – Plan, Do, Check, Act
  • P.P.R.I.O.M.I.R.L

• ISO45001 – Planning, Support and Operation, Performance Evaluation, Continual Improvement
PPICCMC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Range of consequences that may affect a company as a result of a serious incident.

A

Consequences of incident include:
• Criminal prosecution and penalties (EA / HSE)
• Civil actions - damages / claims
• Remediation / clean-up cost
• Lost production / orders
• Expenditure on investigation
• Business continuity
• Remedial action
• PR etc resulting in reduced profitability; reputational damage - both customers / clients and local community / general public
• Higher insurance / difficulty in insuring
• Damage to staff morale / confidence
• Difficulty in retaining / recruiting staff
• Restrictions imposed by regulators (licences / permissioning regimes)
• Damage to shareholder confidence / trust

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Explain the purpose of the Turnbull / Financial Reporting Council Guidelines on “internal control”

A

Purpose of Turnbull guidelines:
• Designed to ensure effective risk management processes are in place.
• Guidelines advocate clear policy and commitment
• Risk evaluation through a process of risk assessment
• Management processes that control risk to an acceptable level
• Monitoring arrangements
• Clear communication and reporting arrangements
• A process of internal audit
• An annual board level review of risk controls and a statement to shareholders on outcomes.
As such Turnbull aims to:
• safeguard shareholder investment
• minimise losses and increase profitability
• assist in compliance with legal obligations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What are the benefits of an integrated health and safety, environmental and quality management system

A

Benefits from retaining separate systems might include:
• Providing a more flexible approach tailored to business needs in terms of system complexity and operating philosophy (eg. Safety standards must be underpinned by legal minima but not so for quality standards
• The need for a more complex system in one element may not be mirrored by a similar need in the other two elements
• Existing systems may work well and the process of integration may expend unnecessary resources and affect their overall effectiveness
• 3 separate systems might be clearer for external stakeholders or regulators to work with and may encourage a more detailed approach to auditing and standards.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

UK Data sources for accidents / ill health and work

A
  • HSE Annual injury / ill-health statistics
  • Labour force survey data
  • Insurance companies
  • Employment medical advisory services (EMAS)
  • RoSPA
  • British Safety Council
  • WHO
  • ILO (International Labour Organisation)
  • IOSH
  • Trade Associations
  • Trade Unions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

UK Data sources for accidents / ill health and work

A
  • HSE publish annual injury and ill-health statistics
  • Labour Force Survey data (published by HSE) indicates scale of occupational ill-health - shows large numbers of people suffering from work related ill- health
  • ill-health data from health service reporting
  • ill-health data from occupational physicians THOR / SWORD etc.
  • ill-health data from RIDDOR
  • Mortality and disease rates from the Office for National Statistics (ONS)
  • DWP – Industrial Injuries Compensation Scheme – e.g. HAVS, NIHL, asbestos-related disease etc
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Legal requirements employer must make when appointing an HSE advisor

A
  • Assistant is to be competent
  • One or more persons as necessary
  • If two or more, arrangements for co-operations
  • Number of assistants and time sufficient for organisations size, risk, and risk distribution
  • Preference for internal appointments
  • Information on health and safety issues to be provided to the external appointees
  • Exemptions for partnerships where partner is sufficiently competent
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Role of the health and safety professional when designing the H&S management system

A

Key elements of strategic role include:
• formulating and developing elements of the health and safety Management system
• developing/agreeing a suitable safety policy statement
• developing and agreeing plans for improvement including short and long-term targets
• involvement in reactive monitoring such as reporting and accident investigation
• involvement in proactive monitoring such as inspections and audits
• Developing/agreeing plans to improve safety culture
• organising and participating in review arrangements
• Managing relationships with enforcing bodies
• advising senior managers / Board on strategic safety issues
• Co-ordination and support issues of a health and safety department

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Purpose of performance measurement

A

Performance measurement provides information on progress and status of risk controls and strategies and allows you to see:

  • Current position relative to H&S aims and objectives
  • How well hazards and risks are being controlled
  • How the organisation compares to others – benchmarking

It also;
• Enables learning from failures – corrective action
• Helps with decision making regarding resources etc
• Maintains and improves the safety management system

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

How societal factors influence health and safety standards and priorities

A
  • Economic Climate - Healthier countries can afford to give OHS a higher priority
  • Government Policies – Those who work are likely to be healthier than those who do not, improving workers health will help keep people at work and this can contribute financially to society
  • Migrant workers – cultural and communication issues effecting health and safety standards
  • Globalisation – businesses that operate around the world may adopt different standards
  • Business risk profile – higher risk activities require better OHS standards i.e. nuclear
  • Societal expectations of equality – can determine standards and priorities for workers who have disabilities etc.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Potential costs to the employer which may arise from a work related ill health scenario

A
  • Compensation costs from civil action cases
  • Legal fees from civil action
  • Fines / prosecution costs
  • Medical treatment costs where not on NHS
  • Risk control re-design of process
  • Loss of production / expertise
  • Lost time for medical assessments etc.
  • Overtime costs for cover
  • Costs of recruitment for replacement employee / temp labour
  • Investigation time
  • Increased insurance premiums
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Ways in which an H&S practitioner could evaluate and develop their own practice

A

A H&S practitioner could evaluate their own practice (= performance / standards) by:
• Reviewing / evaluating their organisation’s H&S performance and attainment levels / trends - possible indication of the H&S practitioner’s effectiveness
• Reviewing the impact of changes / recommendations / interventions they have made
• Setting personal objectives / goals / targets
• Monitoring / reviewing their performance against targets
• Benchmarking their performance against recognised professional standards (e.g. IOSH) / against standards set by other practitioners / against published / recognised standards of good practice
• Evaluating feedback from clients
• Evaluating feedback from managers during appraisal
• Evaluating feedback from others within / outside the organisation
• Reviewing failures / unsuccessful initiatives
• By seeking advice from other H&S professionals / taking criticism well
Could develop (= improve / enhance) their own practice by:
• study / gaining recognised relevant qualifications
• undertaking ongoing training / updates / CPD
• Attending seminars, conferences, lectures
• Networking / consulting with experts, professional bodies
• Ensuring access to relevant up-to-date information sources - publications, web etc
• Seeking advice from other competent professionals
• Following a personal development plan
• Secondments / placements.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Possible costs to an organisation if a H&S management system is not implemented effectively

A
  • Civil Claims / Civil Legal Costs / Criminal fines from increased accidents in the workplace
  • Poor awareness of legal requirements, which will increase the chances of committing an offence.
  • Poor relations and poor morale as employees see that their health and safety is being neglected
  • Poor image and negative public relations from a poor safety management system and culture
  • Poor business efficiency, which will increase costs.
  • Increased insurance premiums for poor risk control
  • No confidence from banks and investors, unable to get loans etc.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Meaning of the term ethics

A

• Ethics is concerned with moral issues i.e. the judgments we make and our resulting conduct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Prescriptive & Goal Setting Legislation

A

• Prescriptive details specifically what the duty holder should do in detailed terms

• Goal setting specifies a broad objective to be achieved and leaves it to the duty holder to decide the best way to achieve the goal
HASAWA is an example of goal setting legislation. for example, “every Employer shall, so far as is reasonably practicable ensure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Advantages and Disadvantages of prescriptive legislation

A

• Advantages
o Little interpretation required
o Relatively easy to enforce
o Same standard required for all
o Does not require a high level of expertise to interpret
• Disadvantages
o Inflexible
o May not be wholly appropriate for the circumstances
o Will need more frequent revision as technology advanced

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

Advantages and Disadvantages of goal setting legislation

A

• Advantages
o Gives more flexibility on interpretation
o Can be related to an actual risk in the workplace
o Less likely to need revision
o Applies to a broader range of workplaces
• Disadvantages
o Standard required may not be clear until further guidance is published
o More difficult to enforce
o Needs a higher level of expertise and interpretation
o Will lead to differing standards due to differing interpretation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

Ratio Decidendi

“The reason for the decision

A

• A statement of law based on an examination of the facts and the legal issues surrounding them. This is the most important part of a judgment and contains the actual binding precedent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

Obiter Dicta

“Words by the way”

A

• These may contain a statement about the law which is not based on the facts of the case under review and which will not therefore be part of the decision. This is often held to be a persuasive authority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

Three underpinning ethics of a safety practitioner

A
  • Integrity - Honest, law-abiding, avoid conflicts of interest
  • Competence – Maintains CPD
  • Respect – Rights and Privacy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

What is meant by conflict of interest

A

A conflict of interest occurs where a person’s professional judgement is influenced by other considerations, such as the possibility of personal gain / benefit.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

Employers duties under regulation 5 Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations

same POCMR OF PP MEASURES

A
  1. —(1) Every employer shall make and give effect to such arrangements as are appropriate, having regard to the nature of his activities and the size of his undertaking, for the effective planning, organisation, control, monitoring and review of the preventive and protective measures.

In writing if 5 or more employees

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

How compliance with the corporate risk management principles set down in the ‘Turnbull Report’ on ‘Internal Control’ could support good health and safety management in an organisation.

A

Compliance with Turnbull Report supports good H&S management because Turnbull advocates:
• Clear policy and commitment
• Risk evaluation through a process of risk assessment
• Management processes that control risk to an acceptable level
• Monitoring arrangements
• Clear communication and reporting arrangements
• Internal audit processes
• Annual Board level review of risk controls
• A statement to shareholders on outcomes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

Factors that should be considered in order to help ensure the successful implementation of
a H&S management system

4 C’s

A
  • Competence/training of yourself and staff so that everyone has the knowledge, skills and experience to work in a safe and healthy manner and whether external expertise is required
  • Control – Are people appointed in suitable roles with clear responsibilities
  • Co-operation – consider regular meetings with employees at all levels to discuss safety issues. Appointment of Safety Representative and Safety Committee to provide a recognised link between employees and management and provision of systems for staff to feedback?
  • Communication – How is information provided e.g. posters, notices, training packages to employees and visitors. Ensure that feedback is given to employees to encourage maintenance of high Health and Safety standards.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

Possible advantages of moving from HS65 to ISO45001

A
  • Allows easier integration with ISO14001 and ISO9001
  • May generate publicity and client interest
  • Customer / client perception of the organisation may be improved - better image
  • 45001 is an internationally recognised standard
  • 45001 is easier to benchmark and audit
  • Allows for independent external registration and verification
  • Lower insurance premiums
  • Better overall H&S management
42
Q

Outline the possible disadvantages of moving from HS65 to ISO45001

A

• Time-consuming and expensive
• May require additional paperwork / bureaucracy / skills
May not be appropriate for SMEs (“over the top”)
• HSG65 is the “official” standard used by enforcing authorities and in H&S guidance so despite the change HSG65 will still be the “reference point” for their inspection / audit / investigation
• If integrated with 14001 & 9001 H&S can lose its identity and be audited by non-specialists

43
Q

Difference between common law and statute law

A

Common law: case law, established in the Courts via judicial precedents as recorded in Law Reports. Judges’ decisions - may be “binding” or “persuasive”. Lower Courts are obliged to follow binding precedents set by superior Courts. Judge made law

Statute law: is a written, codified form of law passed by Parliament in the form of Acts of Parliament (HSWA), or Statutory Instruments (Regulations and Orders) setting out legal requirements and imposing duties and responsibilities. Statute law takes precedence over Common law.

44
Q

Difference between civil law and criminal law

A
  • Civil law: is concerned with resolving “torts” Delict (civil wrongs) i.e. disputes between individual parties (e.g. employer and injured employee); concerned with redress - award of damages / compensation; takes place in County & High Courts; burden of proof = “on balance of probabilities”.
  • Criminal law: involves cases taken by the State (COPF / HSE etc); concerned with establishing innocence or guilt and the setting of penalties / punishment (fines / prison); takes place in Magistrates & Crown Courts; burden of proof = “beyond reasonable doubt”. S 40 HASAWA
45
Q

County Courts

A
  • Do not exercise criminal jurisdiction

* Court will hear cases involving action in contract or tort and where the compensation claim does not exceed £50,000

46
Q

Magistrates Court

3 Types of offence that can be dealt with

A
  • Summary – can only be dealt with by a court of summary jurisdiction i.e. magistrates. Minor offences.
  • Triable either way – Depending on the option exercised by the accused and the gravity of the offence. Most health and safety offences fall into this category. Magistrates can impose custodial sentences up to 6 months & Crown courts up to 2 years
  • Indictable Only – indictment document is drawn up. Mag decides whether sufficient evidence exists to commit the accused to crown court Only for trial. Mag carry out committal proceedings. Act as courts of investigation
47
Q

Referring to case law, outline the nature of the common law duty of care in terms of:

Safe plant and equipment

Wilson & Clyde Coal v English [1938]

A

Relevant case law is Wilson & Clyde Coal v English [1938] - sets out duties to:
• Have arrangements in place to select suitable / safe plant and equipment
• Take account of reasonably foreseeable risks when providing plant and equipment
• Provide and maintain safe plant and equipment
• Introduce systems for inspection, testing, maintenance, repair and the reporting of defects non-delegable nature of the duties. Duties apply to both new and second-hand equipment.

48
Q

Referring to case law, outline the nature of the common law duty of care in terms of:

Safe Place of Work

Latimer vs AEC Ltd [1953]

A

Latimer v AEC Ltd which set out the employer’s duty to:

  • Provide and maintain reasonably safe premises
  • Take account of reasonably foreseeable risks when providing work premises
  • Inspect, maintain and repair work premises
49
Q

Statutory timescale to appeal an improvement notice

A

21 days

50
Q

First court to hear appeal of improvement notice

A

Employment Tribunal

51
Q

Possible outcomes of appeal of improvement notice

A
  • Confirm Improvement Notice
  • Amend Improvement Notice
  • Extend time period
  • Withdraw Improvement Notice
52
Q

If an improvement notice is appealed again from Employment Tribunal, who will hear the appeal

A

• Queen’s Bench Division of the High Court (England & Wales) Court of Session Scotland

53
Q

If the requirements of Improvement notice are ignored, outline the penalties which are available on conviction for failing to comply with the notice

A
  • Magistrates court – Unlimited Fine, 6 Months Imprisonment

* Crown – Unlimited Fine, 2 Years Imprisonment

54
Q

Statutory procedures for making regulations under the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974.

A
  • Section 15 HSWA - Gives power to the secretary of state to make regulations under the act
  • Regulations must involve regulating or prohibiting H&S matters identified in Schedule 3 HSWA
  • The procedure for making regulations requires the SoS to consult HSE and other government departments - Health, Industry - and other interested parties (S50 HSWA) - LAs, TUC, CBI etc (consultative documents may be issued)
  • Alternatively, regulations may be proposed to SoS by HSE
  • Proposed regulations must lie in House of Commons and House of Lords for 40 days
  • If no objections / vote against they pass into law, if opposed / vote against - do not pass into law (S82 negative resolution).
55
Q

Definition of Judicial Precedent

A

• “A decision of a court to which authority is attached”

56
Q

Purpose and principles of cost-benefit analysis as it applies to proposed regulations.

A

Purpose of CBA: Provides a methodology for assessing the overall “value” to society of the proposed regulations by comparing the costs of implementing the regulations with the value of the benefits the regulations may produce in terms of reduced accidents / ill-health.

Principles of CBA: All costs and benefits are converted to monetary values:
• Costs to HSE of administering and enforcing the regulations
• Costs to duty holders of complying with the regulations and the likely benefits to business and society as a whole (NHS savings / sickness benefit / tax savings etc) of reduced injury / ill-health.
• The conventions of CBA require monetary values to be applied to “pain, suffering, loss of a limb and death” - established protocols are applied. Values are adjusted (discounted) to reflect the timescales over which costs may be incurred and benefits accrue - e.g. the benefits of regulations controlling asbestos impose costs now for benefits which may accrue in 30 years’ time. The total costs and benefits are compared to determine whether the proposed regulations provide “value for money”.

57
Q

Give the meaning of the term ‘contract’.

A
  • Agreement between two or more people
  • May be written, verbal, express or implied
  • The parties should intent their agreement to have legal consequences
58
Q

Outline elements required for a contract to be legally enforceable

A
  • Must be an agreement between two parties
  • Consideration - Something of value must be given in exchange for a promise
  • Legal relations – There must be intention to create legal relations i.e. that there will be legal consequences
  • No illegal circumstances – There must be no circumstances surrounding the contract which make it unenforceable, void or illegal.
  • Legal Capacity – The parties must have legal capacity to contract e.g. persons must be over 18yrs old, sound mind
59
Q

Factors that could make a contract potentially unenforceable

A
  • Contract is older than 6 years – no legal remedy after this period
  • The parties must have legal capacity – must of be age, sound mind, not drunk etc.
  • There is illegal circumstances surrounding the contract
  • Contract is unfair
60
Q

Actions taken by contracted parties that make a contract completed.

A

• The parties should intent their agreement to have legal consequences

61
Q

Meaning of the term “absolute”

Stark v. The post office (2000)

A
  • Where the duty is qualified by “shall” without any other word or phrase to lower the standard.
  • For example Reg 4 PUWER – “Employer shall ensure work equipment is constructed or adapted as to be suitable for the purpose to which is to be used”
  • The employer must comply no matter what the cost, time and effort of compliance
  • Prescriptive legislation
62
Q

Meaning of the term “Practicable”

Adsett v. K&L Steelfounders and Engineers Ltd (1953

A
  • ‘Practicable’ means that there must be compliance with the duty as far as technical and practical feasibility allows, within current knowledge and invention and with no reference to cost.
  • Though not an absolute duty, “practicable” is of a higher standard than that of ‘reasonably practicable.

’ Adsett v. K&L Steelfounders and Engineers Ltd (1953)

63
Q

Meaning of the term “Reasonably Practicable”

Edwards v National Coal Board 1949

A
  • ‘Reasonably practicable’ requirements are those where a balance is made between risk and cost (in terms of money, time and trouble) and which are met when the cost of further control is grossly disproportionate to any reduction in risk. Controls must be in proportion to risk.
  • Edwards v National Coal Board [1949]
64
Q

Identify the criminal courts that may hear a prosecution when it is brought for the first time

A
  • Magistrates courts

* Crown Courts

65
Q

Outline the routes of appeal that could be pursued following a conviction

A
  • Appeals could be heard through crown court, then the Court of Appeal (Criminal) and then through to the supreme court.
  • For any important matters of law, it could be heard straight from magistrates to the High Court - Queens Bench Division before potentially being referred onto the supreme court
66
Q

Essential Elements of a legally enforceable contract

A
  • Must be an agreement between two parties
  • Consideration - Something of value must be given in exchange for a promise
  • Legal relations – There must be intention to create legal relations i.e that there will be legal consequences
  • No illegal circumstances – There must be no intention to create legal relations i.e. there will be no legal consequences
  • Legal Capacity – The parties must have legal capacity to contract e.g persons must be over 18yrs old, sound mind, not drunk etc.
  • No illegal circumstances – There must be no circumstances surrounding the contract which make it unenforceable, void or illegal.
67
Q

Describe, with examples, the general types of health and safety-related issue that may be relevant for inclusion in a contract between a client and a contractor undertaking work on the client’s site

A

Issues in a contract could include requirements to:
• Comply with H&S legislation
• Observe site safety rules
• Attend induction training
• Appoint competent persons
• Monitor H&S performance
• Stop work for H&S reasons
• Exclude persons from the site for non-compliance Provide safe plant and equipment
• Provide welfare facilities
• Provide emergency equipment and personnel; Prohibit sub-contracting of work
• Provide Employer’s Liability and Public Liability insurance

68
Q

Explain, with reference to relevant case law, the circumstances in which an employer may be held vicariously liable for the negligent act of a contractor.

Mersey Docks & Harbour Board v Coggins & Griffith (Liverpool) Ltd 1946

A

Employer is vicariously liable for negligent act of contractor if:
• The Employer authorises the negligent act
• The contractor is under the employer’s control when carrying out the negligent act.
• The Employer has some control over the work or co-ordinates the work
• If the Employer selects an incompetent contractor
• [Issue of control addressed in Mersey Docks & Harbour Board v Coggins & Griffith (Liverpool) Ltd 1946 - Employer of the crane driver vicariously liable for his negligence because the hirer of the crane did not have direct control over the way he operated the crane.

69
Q

Legal criteria that must be satisfied to obtain a conviction under the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 (CMCHA)

A
  • The defendant is a qualifying organisation
  • The organisations caused a person’s death
  • There was a relevant duty of care owed by the organisation to the deceased
  • There was a gross breach of that duty – conduct fell far below what is reasonably expected
  • A substantial element of that breach was in the way the those activities were managed or organised by the senior management
70
Q

Identify the bodies responsible for investigating and prosecuting offences under CMCHA

A

Investigate
• Police
• HSE
• Local Authority

Prosecution
• CPS in England & Wales PF in Scotland

71
Q

Outline the penalties that may be imposed following conviction under CMCHA

A
  • Unlimited fine
  • Remedial action – put right the failings
  • Publicity order - name & shame
72
Q

An HSE inspector visits a small, limited company. The inspector decides to serve a Prohibition Notice on the employer in respect of an unguarded machine.

Identify the legal criteria that must be satisfied before a PN may be lawfully served.

A

• Before serving a PN an inspector must be of the opinion that activities to which the relevant statutory provisions apply are being, or are likely to be, carried on and that those activities involve a risk of serious personal injury.

73
Q

If the employer chooses to appeal against the PN identify the effect of the appeal and the timescale within which an appeal must be made.

A
  • Appeal to employment tribunal
  • The PN remains in force i.e. the operation of the drill is still prohibited pending the outcome of the appeal - unless the Tribunal decides to formally suspend the PN during the appeal process.
  • An appeal must be made within 21 days of date of PN being served.
74
Q

Legal criteria that a HSE inspector would need to satisfy to bring a successful prosecution of an Operations Director under Section 37

A

A successful S37 prosecution against the OD would require the inspector to show that:
• The PN was lawfully served (as before)
• The limited company is a “body corporate”
• The OD is an officer of the body corporate (Director, Manager, Secretary)
• An offence under the relevant statutory provisions was committed in that the requirements of the PN had been contravened [see Offences under HSWA S33(1)(g)]
• The offence was committed with the consent / connivance or as a result of the neglect of the OD
Maximum penalties on summary conviction (Magistrates & Crown Court) = Unlimited fine and / or 6 months imprisonment

75
Q

Meaning of Dismissal

A
  • Employer terminates employees contact with or without notice
  • Contract is terminated by employee, who resigns because of employers behaviour – constructive dismissal
76
Q

Outline the relevant duties under the Occupiers’ Liability Act 1984

unlawful entry onto premises

A

Employer owes a duty of care when:

  • The occupier knows that trespassers are gaining access
  • The occupier is aware of danger and has reasonable grounds to believe it exists
  • The risk is one in which the employer may be reasonably expected to protect against
77
Q

OLA 1984 Case Law

British Railways Board v Herrington [1972]

A

A six year old boy was electrocuted and suffered severe burns when he wondered from a play park onto a live railway line. The railway line was surrounded by a fence however, part of the fence had been pushed down and the gap created had been used frequently as a short cut to the park. The defendant was aware of the gap in the fence which had been present for several months, but had failed to do anything about it. Under existing authority of Addie v Dumbreck no duty of care was owed to trespassers. However, the House of Lords departed from their previous decision using the 1966 Practice Statement and held that the defendant railway company did owe a duty of common humanity to trespassers.

78
Q

Section 2 (1) HSWA 1974

A

Employers duty:
To ensure SFAIRP, the health, safety and welfare at work of all his employees. And anyone who may be effected by his acts of omissions

79
Q

Section 2 (2) HSWA 1974

A

a) Safe plant and systems at work – provision and maintenance
b) Safe use, handling, storage and transport of articles and substances – Arrangements
c) IIT&S – Provision
d) Safe place of work – maintained includes access and egress
e) Safe environment – adequate facilities

80
Q

Section 2 (3) HSWA 1974

A
  • Written Safety Policy – prepare and revise, bring to the attention of employees
  • Fewer than 5 employees, can be verbal form
81
Q

Section 3 HSWA 1974 ( Criminal case Law)

R v. Associated Octel co. Ltd (1996)
R v. Porter (2008)

A
  • Written Policy 5 or more people employed
  • Employer shall not expose non-employees to risk to their health and safety – SFAIRP
  • Self-employed responsible for own safety and others
  • Contractors, 3rd party ect
82
Q

Section 4 HSWA 1974 (Criminal Case Law)

Select management Ltd v. Westminster City Council (1984)

A
  • It shall be the duty of each person who has, to any extent, control of premises to which this section applies or of the means of access there to or egress there from or of any plant or substance in such premises to take such measures as it is reasonable for a person in his position to take to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, that the premises, all means of access there to or egress there from available for use by persons using the premises, and any plant or substance in the premises or, as the case may be, provided for use there, is or are safe and without risks to health.
  • Non domestic property
  • Landlords are included i.e. offices, shared areas
83
Q

Section 6 HSWA 1974

designers, manufactures, imports or supplies equipment

A

It shall be the duty of any person who designs, manufactures, imports or supplies any article for use at work or any article of fairground equipment—

a) to ensure, SFAIRP that the article is so designed and constructed that it will be safe and without risks to health at all times when it is being set, used, cleaned or maintained by a person at work;
b) to carry out or arrange for the carrying out of such testing and examination as may be necessary for the performance of the duty imposed on him by the preceding paragraph;
c) to take such steps as are necessary to secure that persons supplied by that person with the article are provided with adequate information about the use for which the article is designed or has been tested and about any conditions necessary to ensure that it will be safe and without risks to health at all such times as are mentioned in paragraph (a) above and when it is being dismantled or disposed of; and
d) to take such steps as are necessary to secure, SFAIRP, that persons so supplied are provided with all such revisions of information provided to them by virtue of the preceding paragraph as are necessary by reason of its becoming known that anything gives rise to a serious risk to health or safety.

84
Q

Statutory duties set down in Section 6 HSWA in so far as they affect substances for use at work.

Your answer should contain a description of the duty holders and the duties concerned

A

S6 duties on manufacturers, importers, suppliers to:

  • Ensure SFAIRP, that substances are Safe and Without Risk To Health and safety. when being used, handled, stored, transported
  • To carry out necessary tests to ensure the above
  • To provide those supplied with relevant information on H&S hazards and requirements for safe use, handling, storage, transport, disposal etc (see MSDS)
  • To provide revised information as necessary
85
Q

Employee is injured by a chair when the adjustment mechanism, which used gas under pressure, exploded due to a manufacturing fault.

With reference to case law where appropriate, explain the civil and criminal law implications of this accident.
Davie v New Merton Board Mills LTD 1958 Case Law

A
  • Employer duties under the HASAW Act, section 2, and PUWER may be peripherally relevant but, since it was a manufacturing fault, it is quite reasonable to speculate that it may not have been reasonably practicable for the employer to be aware of the fault. In this respect, the manufacturer’s duties under section 6 of the HSAW Act should have formed the significant part of the criminal aspects.
  • The Employer’s Liability (Defective Equipment) Act 1969 allows an employee to recover damages from their employer when injured in the course of employment through the use of defective equipment supplied for the employee’s use even though the defect was wholly or partly the fault of a third party (the manufacturer); EL(DE)A imposes strict liability on employer with respect to injury caused by defective work equipment even if defect attributable to a third party; strict liability = liability without the need to prove fault, negligence or intent; the employer can then claim damages against the manufacturer
86
Q

As a result of the failure of a lift and the injuries caused, both an employer and contractor were prosecuted.

It was decided to prosecute the contractor under Section 6 of the HSWA 1974. Explain why this section is relevant to this scenario AND describe the requirements of the Section that would be relevant to the design and installation of the lift. (10)

A

Relevance:
• S6(1) places duties on persons who design, manufacture, (import) or supply articles for use at work
• S6(3) places duties on persons who install any article for use at work in premises where it is to be used by persons at work. In this case the contractor is a designer, supplier and installer of a passenger lift (which is an article for use at work).
Requirements:
• Ensure SFAIRP that the article is designed to be safe and without risks to health at all times when it is being set up, used, cleaned or maintained by a person at work
• Carry out / arrange for any testing and examination required to meet the above duty
• Ensure that persons supplied with the article of work equipment are provided with adequate information re its use etc (as above), dismantling or disposal
• Provide, SFAIRP, revised / updated information as necessary (e.g. serious risk arising)
• Carry out / arrange for any research necessary to eliminate / minimise risk to health or safety SFAIRP
• Ensure SFAIRP that nothing in the way the work equipment is installed makes it unsafe or a risk to health during use (etc)

87
Q

Section 8 HSWA 1974

Misuse of HS equipment

A

Duty not to interfere with or misuse things provided pursuant to certain provisions.

• No person shall intentionally or recklessly interfere with or misuse anything provided in the interests of health, safety or welfare in pursuance of any of the relevant statutory provisions.

88
Q

Section 9 HSWA 1974

Employer to Not charge for PPE and safety equip

A

Duty not to charge employees for things done or provided pursuant to certain specific requirements.

• No employer shall levy or permit to be levied on any employee of his any charge in respect of anything done or provided in pursuance of any specific requirement of the relevant statutory provisions.

89
Q

Regulation 3 MHSWR 1999

Risk Assessment

A

Risk assessment
3.—(1) Every employer shall make a suitable and sufficient assessment of significant hazards that show potential risks

(a) The risks to the health and safety of his employees to which they are exposed whilst they are at work; and
(b) The risks to the health and safety of persons not in his employment arising out of or in connection with the conduct by him of his undertaking, Significant Risk

90
Q

Regulation 4 MHSWR 1999

Principles of prevention

A

Principles of prevention to be applied

  1. Where an employer implements any preventive and protective measures he shall do so on the basis of the principles specified in Schedule 1 to these Regulations.
91
Q

Regulation 5 MHSWR 1999
Health and safety arrangements
Ties in with S 2,3 HSWA

A

Health and safety arrangements
5.—(1) Every employer shall make and give effect to such arrangements as are appropriate, having regard to the nature of his activities and the size of his undertaking, for the effective planning, organisation, control, monitoring and review of the preventive and protective measures.

(2) Where the employer employs five or more employees, he shall record the arrangements referred to in paragraph (1)

92
Q

With reference to relevant civil legislation, outline the nature of the duty owed by the occupying organisation to their lawful visitors

A
  • Occupier’s Liability Act 1957 imposes a duty of care on the occupier in relation to lawful visitors.
  • The occupier must “take reasonable care to see that the visitor will be reasonably safe in using the premises for the purposes for which he is invited or permitted by the occupier to be there.
93
Q

Who may have a civil liability at common law for an injury at work. Use case law.
vicarious liability

A
  • The employer - if he has behaved negligently (Relevant case - Donoghue v Stephenson,
  • (Relevant case Caparo v Dickman and other
  • The employer will have vicarious liability providing employer was acting in the course of employment
  • Breaking the rules does not remove vicarious liability (Relevant case - Rose v Plenty, Lister v Romford Ice and Cold Storage)
94
Q

OLA 1957

A sign shows “The management accepts no liability for loss or injury howsoever caused”

Explain why the organisation will be unable to use this statement in its defence

A

The reason they cannot rely on this as a defence is because a notice excluding liability is NOT classed as a warning as specified in OLA 57. Under s.2(4) OLA 57 a warning will only serve to discharge the occupier’s duty with respect to the danger if it enables the person to whom the duty is owed to be reasonably safe.

The warning must therefore be sufficiently clear about the danger and ways of avoiding the danger must be readily available. A notice saying that you will not be held liable doesn’t do that.

95
Q

Common law duty

An action alleging negligence by an employee is brought on behalf of an injured party.

Outline possible defences against such an action.

A
  • Common law duty
  • Denial of facts regarding the injury
  • Out of time / case brought too late, 3 years time limit
  • No duty of care owed to the injured party
  • Duty not breached – with reference to foreseeability or reasonableness
  • Damage not arising from the breach – injured through some other cause
  • Type of damage not reasonably foreseeable
  • Volenti non fit injuria
  • Contributory negligence
  • Employer being sued, employee acting outside course of employment.
96
Q

A negligence claim is to be managed in accordance with the relevant pre-action protocol.

Identify possible documents that a defendant may have to send to the claimant under this protocol.

A
  • Accident book entry
  • First-aider report
  • Surgery record
  • Foreman / supervisor accident report
  • Safety representatives accident report
  • RIDDOR report to HSE
  • Other communications between defendants and HSE
  • Minutes of Health and Safety Committee meeting(s) where accident/matter considered
  • Report to DSS
  • Pre-accident risk assessment
  • Post- accident risk assessment
  • other relevant information (e.g. training or information records).
97
Q

Orders that an Employment Tribunal may make if they find in a case the employees favour
R.R.C

A
  • Reinstatement - returned to original job and conditions as though nothing ever occurred
  • Reengagement – returned to same employer - different job or conditions, terms etc.
  • Compensation – financial award for loss of employment, etc.
98
Q

Body that would hear any appeal from the decision of the Employment Tribunal

A

Employment Appeal Tribunal

99
Q

Purpose of regulatory enforcement

A
  • To prevent harm
  • To secure sustained improvement in the management of health and safety risks
  • To hold those who fail to meet their health and safety obligations to account
  • Deter against those businesses who fail to meet these obligations and thereby derive an unfair competitive advantage
100
Q

Factors which will be considered when determining the level of damages paid to a successful claimant

A
  • Degree of disability
  • Loss of earnings and/or opportunities
  • Pain and suffering
  • Medical costs and expenses
  • The cost of special adaptations
  • The cost of care
  • Loss of amenity
  • Contributory negligence might result in a reduction of damages awarded.
101
Q

Defences available to a defendant who, in a civil case, is being sued in an action for common law negligence

A
  • Denial of facts regarding the injury
  • Out of time / case brought too late
  • No duty of care owed to the plaintiff
  • Duty not breached – with reference to foreseeability or reasonableness
  • Damage not arising from the breach – plaintiff injured through some other cause
  • Type of damage not reasonably foreseeable
  • Volenti non fit injuria
  • Contributory negligence