Unit A 3rd 100 Flashcards
Legal actions that might be available to an injured
person in a claim for compensation AND the tests that would have to be made for the actions to succeed
In order to succeed in an action for negligence, the claimant would need to
Prove:
• That a duty of care was owed to him
• That this duty was breached
• That his injuries occurred as a result of the breach
• That the type of injury was reasonably foreseeable.
Inclusion of these stages as they applied to a scenario was required – for instance, that the employer had not done everything that could reasonably be expected to prevent a foreseeable accident in that a safe system of work had not
been provided. Marks were also available for reference to relevant case law such as
Wilsons & Clyde Coal v English (1938).
The claimant would also be able to pursue an action for a breach of statutory duty.
For this claim to succeed he would need to prove:
• That he was within the class of persons the statute was designed to protect (he was an employee acting in the course of his employment)
• That his injury was of the type that the requirements of the statute were intended to prevent
• That a duty was placed on the defendant which he had failed to meet and that the injury sustained was a direct result of this failure.
Additionally, he would have to counter any argument that the legislation involved did not allow for civil action to be taken.
The meaning of ‘general’ and ‘special’ damages that may be awarded in the event of a successful claim AND give examples of the factors that are considered in calculating their value.
General damages:
• Where no exact sum is calculable, are based on estimated financial costs, such as loss of future income in cases where there is partial or complete incapacity, sums awarded for pain and suffering and those awarded for the reduction in the claimant’s quality of life and amenity where account is taken of factors such as age, lack of mobility, degree of disfigurement, inability to pursue sports, hobbies and other interests, and diminished eligibility for social relationships.
Special damages:
• Where the exact sum is calculable such as itemised legal expenses, the loss of earnings prior to trial and the costs that have accrued in making alterations to property as a direct result of a disability resulting from the workplace accident.
The meaning of ‘skill-based’, ‘rule-based’ AND
‘knowledge-based’ behaviour.
Skill based:
• Involves a low level, pre-programmed sequence of actions where employees carry out routine operations, often as though they were on ‘auto pilot’
Rule based:
• Involves actions based on recognising patterns or situations and then selecting actions based on a learned set of rules.
Knowledge based:
• Involved at the higher problem-solving level, when there are no set rules and a decision on the appropriate action to be taken is based on knowledge of the system.
How might ‘Skill Based’ errors give rise to human failure
Errors may arise if:
• A similar routine is incorrectly selected
• If there is interruption or inattention causing a stage in the operation to be omitted or repeated
• I checks are not carried out to verify that the correct routine has been selected.
Preventive measures include:
• Designing routines and controls so that they are distinct from each other
• Using feedback signals to warn when the wrong course of action is being taken
• Allowing adequate work breaks or job rotation to maintain attention
• Introducing training, competence assessment and a high level of supervision.
Signals passed at danger on the railway may be a result of skill-based errors.
How might ‘Rule Based’ errors give rise to human failure
Errors may occur where, for example:
• The diagnosis is based only on previous experience or where sufficient training has not been given to enable employees to make an accurate diagnosis
• Where there is a tendency to apply the usual rule or solution even if it is inappropriate
• Where simply there is a failure to remember the rule that should be applied.
Preventive measures include:
• Clear presentation of information, logical and easy to follow rule sets, systems designed to highlight infrequent or unusual events
• Provision of training and competence assessment.
Examples (Piper Alpha or Three Mile Island)
How might ‘Knowledge Based’ errors give rise to human failure
Errors will occur if:
• There is a lack of knowledge or inadequate understanding of the system
• If there is insufficient time to carry out a proper diagnosis
• If the problem is not properly thought through or evidence is ignored.
Preventive measures include:
• Training particularly in risk and hazard assessment
• The provision of adequate resources in terms of information and time
• The use of supervision and checking systems such as group or peer review.
Flixborough and Port Ramsgate provide examples of this type of error.
Objectives of Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
FMEA
Objectives of FMEA are to analyse each component of a system in order to identify the possible causes of its failure and the effects of the failure on the system as a whole.
Methodology of FMEA AND give an example of a
typical safety application
The methodology of FMEA involves breaking a system down into its component parts
and identifying how each part could fail and all possible causes for its failure
Safety Application:
• Identifying the effects of the failure on the system as a whole in terms of the severity of the consequences and assessing the probability of failure
• Identifying means for the detection of the failure such as by sensors
• Allocating a risk priority number to each component based on the probability and severity of failure and the effectiveness of its detection
• Devising actions to reduce the risk to a tolerable level and documenting the results in a suitable format.
Ways develop and support the arrangements for consultation with employees on health and
safety matters.
Safety Representatives and Safety Committees Regulations
Health and Safety (Consultation with Employees) Regulations
- Initially, the health and safety professional might advise on the requirements of the Regulations and the good and accepted practices to be followed both by safety committees and safety representatives
- Make proposals for local arrangements for formal consultation
- Offer advice and support for the training arrangements of safety representatives and representatives of employee safety and arrange for the necessary resources to be provided to enable them to carry out their duties.
- They might also usefully influence the constitution, composition and agenda of the safety committee and by attending the meetings of the committee, provide professional advice to assist the members in their deliberations while additionally advising on the arrangements for direct consultation with employees and encouraging informal consultation at routine team meetings and briefings.
- Finally they will have a part to play in encouraging senior management members to take an active part in both formal and informal consultation and to respond promptly to proposals made and concerns expressed during the consultation process.
Statutory duties set down in Section 4 of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974.
The section imposes duties on persons in control of non-domestic premises which are made available to others, who are not their employees, as a place of work or as a place where plant or substances are provided for their use.
The duties include taking reasonable measures to ensure that the premises, the means of access and egress to them and the plant and substances provided for use are safe and without risks to health.
The measures that it will be reasonable to expect the duty holder to take will depend both on the degree of control which he/she has, and this may be determined by a contract of tenancy, and on the test of reasonable practicability.
Main defences to a civil action for breach of statutory duty.
Initial procedural defences that might be offered:
- Were that the action was out of time or was not allowed by the relevant statute. - If neither were held to be valid, then it might be argued that there was no breach of the duty owed by the defendant under the statute and if there was a breach, it did not cause the injury to which the action referred.
- Claimant was not within the class of persons protected by the statute nor was the harm suffered by the claimant of the type that the statute was designed to prevent.
Reference to relevant case law such as Corn v Weirs Glass (Hanley) Ltd
Meaning of ‘joint and several liability’
Where all parties involved in committing the negligent act are individually liable for the full amount of damages.
Such damages may be recovered in full from any one of the negligent parties following a successful civil action.
The party thus sued may then claim a contribution from the others who are jointly liable.
Tortfeasor
A person who has committed a Tort
Tort – A civil wrong
Reasons why the rate of reported accidents can be a poor measure of a campaign’s effectiveness
Previously been under reported either because of a deficiency in the existing reporting procedures or ignorance on the part of the employees that reporting was necessary.
Raised awareness, prompted by the advertising campaign, could have led to previously unreported accidents now being reported and that, in the absence of any other data, it would not be possible to gauge whether or not the increase was “real”.
Other reasons why using the number of reported accidents might be an unsatisfactory way of measuring the effectiveness of the campaign could be that the anticipated improvement in health and safety standards may not be apparent until sometime after the campaign has ended or that the campaign may have focused on specific hazards which are not the basis of many of the reported accidents.
Proactive (active) monitoring techniques which
might be used to assess the organisation’s health and safety performance
Proactive:
• Safety inspections involving physical inspections of the workplace to identify hazards and unsafe conditions
• Safety audits, where the systematic critical examination of all aspects of an organisation’s health and safety performance against stated objectives is carried out
• Safety tours involving unscheduled inspections to observe the workplace in operation without prior warning.
• Safety sampling, safety surveys, environmental monitoring, safety
• climate measures, behavioural observation and benchmarking.
Issues that would need to be considered when
assessing whether a proposed extra detector in parallel should be adopted
- Probability of system failure and its consequences
- Legal requirements and advice contained in industry and HSE codes of practice and guidance
- The initial cost of the additional detector coupled with the subsequent expense connected with its ongoing maintenance and inspection and risk tolerability criteria such as those for example contained in ‘reducing risks protecting people’.
Assuming that the decision is taken to use two detectors in parallel, outline other ways in which the reliability of the control system could be improved
Ways in which the reliability of the control system could be improved:
- Use of design stage failure tracing techniques such as FMEA and HAZOP
- Introducing purchasing quality control arrangements to ensure the most reliable detectors are used and using two different types of equipment to minimise the risk of common mode failure
- Ensuring the system components are tested before installation and that they are correctly installed by competent personnel
- Arranging for the introduction of procedures for the periodic inspection, testing and maintenance of the system including the replacement of components within their useful life
- Providing training to employees in operating the system and in fault detection and using indicators or warnings to indicate component failure.
Meaning of ‘Common Mode Failure’
A failure of a number of items due to a common cause e.g. loss of electricity supply
Or
A type or cause of failure that could affect more than one component at a time, even when the components are supposed to be arranged to operate independently of each other.
Statutory reporting and recording requirements under the Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences Regulations 2013 that apply when someone is either injured at work or by a work activity.
- The reporting and recording duties under the Regulations fall to the responsible person who is nominally the employer or the person in control of the premises where the accident occurred.
- When a person at work is killed or suffers a major injury such as an amputation or permanent or temporary loss of sight, a report has to be sent to the enforcing authority by the quickest possible means
- Submit appropriate written report (F2508IE) within 10 days for fatalities, specified injuries, accident to non-employees (taken to hospital) and dangerous occurrences
- For over 7- day injuries, submit the appropriate form within 15 days
- Fatal and specified injuries reported to HSE call centre only
- If a person who has suffered a major injury accident subsequently dies within a year of the date of the accident, the enforcing authority must be informed in writing as soon as they are aware of it
- If an employee suffers an accident which is not classed as major but following which he/she is incapable of carrying out their normal work for a period of more than three days, a written report must be submitted to the enforcing authority within ten days.
- Records of reportable incidents including the name of the injured person, the date and time of the accident, place where it happened, occupation, cause and nature, name and address of notifier and the date the report was submitted to the enforcing authority, must be kept for a period of three years.
Methods or techniques that can be used to help in the identification of immediate and underlying causes during accident investigation
- Identifying the immediate causes for each event leading up to the accident and then for each immediate cause, identifying one or more underlying causes
- Using a structured ‘why’ questioning analysis
- Using immediate and underlying cause checklists such as HSG245 (adverse event analysis) or HSG65 (Appendix 5)
- Carrying out an events and causal effects analysis – a graphical method of linking accident events with causal factors and using a team of people with relevant knowledge to identify both the immediate and underlying causes
- Fault Tree Analysis
- Event Tree Analysis
Meaning and relevance of the following terms in the context of controlling human error in the workplace:
(i) ‘ergonomics’;
(ii) ‘anthropometry’;
(iii) ‘task analysis’.
Ergonomics:
The design of equipment, task and environment to take account of human limitations and capabilities
Anthropometry:
The collection of data on human physical dimensions which can then be applied to equipment design
Task Analysis:
The breaking down of tasks into successively more detailed actions which allows an analysis of the scope for human error with each action.
Ways in which human reliability in the workplace may be improved.
Individual issues:
• Careful selection of staff taking into account skills, qualifications and aptitude
• The provision of appropriate training both at the induction stage and to meet subsequent job specific needs
• The consideration of the special needs of those who may be more vulnerable
• Monitoring personal safety performance
• Using workplace incentive schemes and assessing job satisfaction and providing health surveillance and a counselling service for those suffering from the effects of stress.
Job Issues:
• Introduction of task analysis for critical tasks
• The design of work patterns and shift organisation to minimise stress and
• Fatigue
• The use of job rotation to minimise monotony
• The introduction of good communication arrangements between individuals, shifts and groups and using a sufficient number of personnel to avoid constant time pressures
Organisational Issues:
• Development of a positive health and safety culture the provision of good
• leadership example and commitment
• The introduction of effective health and safety management systems
• Maximising employee involvement in health and safety issues
• Ensuring effective arrangements for employee consultation
• The introduction of procedures for change management and the provision of an adequate level of supervision
A number of external bodies may influence health and safety standards in an organisation.
Using specific examples of external bodies, explain in EACH case why they influence internal decision making on health and safety matters in an organisation.
- Parliament and the legislation it produces
- Enforcing authorities and the powers available to them
- Courts and the legal decisions that they make
- Clients and customers and their expectations
- Contractors and/or competitors and the pressures they might exert
- Trade unions; insurance companies with their ability to increase employer or public liability insurance or even refuse cover
- Public opinion and pressure groups
- Technical standards or professional bodies such as CEN, IOSH and ILO
- Accrediting bodies and consultants and training providers.
How might task analysis may be used to help with hazard identification as part of a risk assessment process.
Task analysis involves breaking down an activity or process into its more detailed constituent parts.
This allows a more systematic identification of the hazards associated with the activity or process to be made and makes for an easier assessment of the scope for human error.