Unit A 3rd 100 Flashcards
Legal actions that might be available to an injured
person in a claim for compensation AND the tests that would have to be made for the actions to succeed
In order to succeed in an action for negligence, the claimant would need to
Prove:
• That a duty of care was owed to him
• That this duty was breached
• That his injuries occurred as a result of the breach
• That the type of injury was reasonably foreseeable.
Inclusion of these stages as they applied to a scenario was required – for instance, that the employer had not done everything that could reasonably be expected to prevent a foreseeable accident in that a safe system of work had not
been provided. Marks were also available for reference to relevant case law such as
Wilsons & Clyde Coal v English (1938).
The claimant would also be able to pursue an action for a breach of statutory duty.
For this claim to succeed he would need to prove:
• That he was within the class of persons the statute was designed to protect (he was an employee acting in the course of his employment)
• That his injury was of the type that the requirements of the statute were intended to prevent
• That a duty was placed on the defendant which he had failed to meet and that the injury sustained was a direct result of this failure.
Additionally, he would have to counter any argument that the legislation involved did not allow for civil action to be taken.
The meaning of ‘general’ and ‘special’ damages that may be awarded in the event of a successful claim AND give examples of the factors that are considered in calculating their value.
General damages:
• Where no exact sum is calculable, are based on estimated financial costs, such as loss of future income in cases where there is partial or complete incapacity, sums awarded for pain and suffering and those awarded for the reduction in the claimant’s quality of life and amenity where account is taken of factors such as age, lack of mobility, degree of disfigurement, inability to pursue sports, hobbies and other interests, and diminished eligibility for social relationships.
Special damages:
• Where the exact sum is calculable such as itemised legal expenses, the loss of earnings prior to trial and the costs that have accrued in making alterations to property as a direct result of a disability resulting from the workplace accident.
The meaning of ‘skill-based’, ‘rule-based’ AND
‘knowledge-based’ behaviour.
Skill based:
• Involves a low level, pre-programmed sequence of actions where employees carry out routine operations, often as though they were on ‘auto pilot’
Rule based:
• Involves actions based on recognising patterns or situations and then selecting actions based on a learned set of rules.
Knowledge based:
• Involved at the higher problem-solving level, when there are no set rules and a decision on the appropriate action to be taken is based on knowledge of the system.
How might ‘Skill Based’ errors give rise to human failure
Errors may arise if:
• A similar routine is incorrectly selected
• If there is interruption or inattention causing a stage in the operation to be omitted or repeated
• I checks are not carried out to verify that the correct routine has been selected.
Preventive measures include:
• Designing routines and controls so that they are distinct from each other
• Using feedback signals to warn when the wrong course of action is being taken
• Allowing adequate work breaks or job rotation to maintain attention
• Introducing training, competence assessment and a high level of supervision.
Signals passed at danger on the railway may be a result of skill-based errors.
How might ‘Rule Based’ errors give rise to human failure
Errors may occur where, for example:
• The diagnosis is based only on previous experience or where sufficient training has not been given to enable employees to make an accurate diagnosis
• Where there is a tendency to apply the usual rule or solution even if it is inappropriate
• Where simply there is a failure to remember the rule that should be applied.
Preventive measures include:
• Clear presentation of information, logical and easy to follow rule sets, systems designed to highlight infrequent or unusual events
• Provision of training and competence assessment.
Examples (Piper Alpha or Three Mile Island)
How might ‘Knowledge Based’ errors give rise to human failure
Errors will occur if:
• There is a lack of knowledge or inadequate understanding of the system
• If there is insufficient time to carry out a proper diagnosis
• If the problem is not properly thought through or evidence is ignored.
Preventive measures include:
• Training particularly in risk and hazard assessment
• The provision of adequate resources in terms of information and time
• The use of supervision and checking systems such as group or peer review.
Flixborough and Port Ramsgate provide examples of this type of error.
Objectives of Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
FMEA
Objectives of FMEA are to analyse each component of a system in order to identify the possible causes of its failure and the effects of the failure on the system as a whole.
Methodology of FMEA AND give an example of a
typical safety application
The methodology of FMEA involves breaking a system down into its component parts
and identifying how each part could fail and all possible causes for its failure
Safety Application:
• Identifying the effects of the failure on the system as a whole in terms of the severity of the consequences and assessing the probability of failure
• Identifying means for the detection of the failure such as by sensors
• Allocating a risk priority number to each component based on the probability and severity of failure and the effectiveness of its detection
• Devising actions to reduce the risk to a tolerable level and documenting the results in a suitable format.
Ways develop and support the arrangements for consultation with employees on health and
safety matters.
Safety Representatives and Safety Committees Regulations
Health and Safety (Consultation with Employees) Regulations
- Initially, the health and safety professional might advise on the requirements of the Regulations and the good and accepted practices to be followed both by safety committees and safety representatives
- Make proposals for local arrangements for formal consultation
- Offer advice and support for the training arrangements of safety representatives and representatives of employee safety and arrange for the necessary resources to be provided to enable them to carry out their duties.
- They might also usefully influence the constitution, composition and agenda of the safety committee and by attending the meetings of the committee, provide professional advice to assist the members in their deliberations while additionally advising on the arrangements for direct consultation with employees and encouraging informal consultation at routine team meetings and briefings.
- Finally they will have a part to play in encouraging senior management members to take an active part in both formal and informal consultation and to respond promptly to proposals made and concerns expressed during the consultation process.
Statutory duties set down in Section 4 of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974.
The section imposes duties on persons in control of non-domestic premises which are made available to others, who are not their employees, as a place of work or as a place where plant or substances are provided for their use.
The duties include taking reasonable measures to ensure that the premises, the means of access and egress to them and the plant and substances provided for use are safe and without risks to health.
The measures that it will be reasonable to expect the duty holder to take will depend both on the degree of control which he/she has, and this may be determined by a contract of tenancy, and on the test of reasonable practicability.
Main defences to a civil action for breach of statutory duty.
Initial procedural defences that might be offered:
- Were that the action was out of time or was not allowed by the relevant statute. - If neither were held to be valid, then it might be argued that there was no breach of the duty owed by the defendant under the statute and if there was a breach, it did not cause the injury to which the action referred.
- Claimant was not within the class of persons protected by the statute nor was the harm suffered by the claimant of the type that the statute was designed to prevent.
Reference to relevant case law such as Corn v Weirs Glass (Hanley) Ltd
Meaning of ‘joint and several liability’
Where all parties involved in committing the negligent act are individually liable for the full amount of damages.
Such damages may be recovered in full from any one of the negligent parties following a successful civil action.
The party thus sued may then claim a contribution from the others who are jointly liable.
Tortfeasor
A person who has committed a Tort
Tort – A civil wrong
Reasons why the rate of reported accidents can be a poor measure of a campaign’s effectiveness
Previously been under reported either because of a deficiency in the existing reporting procedures or ignorance on the part of the employees that reporting was necessary.
Raised awareness, prompted by the advertising campaign, could have led to previously unreported accidents now being reported and that, in the absence of any other data, it would not be possible to gauge whether or not the increase was “real”.
Other reasons why using the number of reported accidents might be an unsatisfactory way of measuring the effectiveness of the campaign could be that the anticipated improvement in health and safety standards may not be apparent until sometime after the campaign has ended or that the campaign may have focused on specific hazards which are not the basis of many of the reported accidents.
Proactive (active) monitoring techniques which
might be used to assess the organisation’s health and safety performance
Proactive:
• Safety inspections involving physical inspections of the workplace to identify hazards and unsafe conditions
• Safety audits, where the systematic critical examination of all aspects of an organisation’s health and safety performance against stated objectives is carried out
• Safety tours involving unscheduled inspections to observe the workplace in operation without prior warning.
• Safety sampling, safety surveys, environmental monitoring, safety
• climate measures, behavioural observation and benchmarking.
Issues that would need to be considered when
assessing whether a proposed extra detector in parallel should be adopted
- Probability of system failure and its consequences
- Legal requirements and advice contained in industry and HSE codes of practice and guidance
- The initial cost of the additional detector coupled with the subsequent expense connected with its ongoing maintenance and inspection and risk tolerability criteria such as those for example contained in ‘reducing risks protecting people’.
Assuming that the decision is taken to use two detectors in parallel, outline other ways in which the reliability of the control system could be improved
Ways in which the reliability of the control system could be improved:
- Use of design stage failure tracing techniques such as FMEA and HAZOP
- Introducing purchasing quality control arrangements to ensure the most reliable detectors are used and using two different types of equipment to minimise the risk of common mode failure
- Ensuring the system components are tested before installation and that they are correctly installed by competent personnel
- Arranging for the introduction of procedures for the periodic inspection, testing and maintenance of the system including the replacement of components within their useful life
- Providing training to employees in operating the system and in fault detection and using indicators or warnings to indicate component failure.
Meaning of ‘Common Mode Failure’
A failure of a number of items due to a common cause e.g. loss of electricity supply
Or
A type or cause of failure that could affect more than one component at a time, even when the components are supposed to be arranged to operate independently of each other.
Statutory reporting and recording requirements under the Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences Regulations 2013 that apply when someone is either injured at work or by a work activity.
- The reporting and recording duties under the Regulations fall to the responsible person who is nominally the employer or the person in control of the premises where the accident occurred.
- When a person at work is killed or suffers a major injury such as an amputation or permanent or temporary loss of sight, a report has to be sent to the enforcing authority by the quickest possible means
- Submit appropriate written report (F2508IE) within 10 days for fatalities, specified injuries, accident to non-employees (taken to hospital) and dangerous occurrences
- For over 7- day injuries, submit the appropriate form within 15 days
- Fatal and specified injuries reported to HSE call centre only
- If a person who has suffered a major injury accident subsequently dies within a year of the date of the accident, the enforcing authority must be informed in writing as soon as they are aware of it
- If an employee suffers an accident which is not classed as major but following which he/she is incapable of carrying out their normal work for a period of more than three days, a written report must be submitted to the enforcing authority within ten days.
- Records of reportable incidents including the name of the injured person, the date and time of the accident, place where it happened, occupation, cause and nature, name and address of notifier and the date the report was submitted to the enforcing authority, must be kept for a period of three years.
Methods or techniques that can be used to help in the identification of immediate and underlying causes during accident investigation
- Identifying the immediate causes for each event leading up to the accident and then for each immediate cause, identifying one or more underlying causes
- Using a structured ‘why’ questioning analysis
- Using immediate and underlying cause checklists such as HSG245 (adverse event analysis) or HSG65 (Appendix 5)
- Carrying out an events and causal effects analysis – a graphical method of linking accident events with causal factors and using a team of people with relevant knowledge to identify both the immediate and underlying causes
- Fault Tree Analysis
- Event Tree Analysis
Meaning and relevance of the following terms in the context of controlling human error in the workplace:
(i) ‘ergonomics’;
(ii) ‘anthropometry’;
(iii) ‘task analysis’.
Ergonomics:
The design of equipment, task and environment to take account of human limitations and capabilities
Anthropometry:
The collection of data on human physical dimensions which can then be applied to equipment design
Task Analysis:
The breaking down of tasks into successively more detailed actions which allows an analysis of the scope for human error with each action.
Ways in which human reliability in the workplace may be improved.
Individual issues:
• Careful selection of staff taking into account skills, qualifications and aptitude
• The provision of appropriate training both at the induction stage and to meet subsequent job specific needs
• The consideration of the special needs of those who may be more vulnerable
• Monitoring personal safety performance
• Using workplace incentive schemes and assessing job satisfaction and providing health surveillance and a counselling service for those suffering from the effects of stress.
Job Issues:
• Introduction of task analysis for critical tasks
• The design of work patterns and shift organisation to minimise stress and
• Fatigue
• The use of job rotation to minimise monotony
• The introduction of good communication arrangements between individuals, shifts and groups and using a sufficient number of personnel to avoid constant time pressures
Organisational Issues:
• Development of a positive health and safety culture the provision of good
• leadership example and commitment
• The introduction of effective health and safety management systems
• Maximising employee involvement in health and safety issues
• Ensuring effective arrangements for employee consultation
• The introduction of procedures for change management and the provision of an adequate level of supervision
A number of external bodies may influence health and safety standards in an organisation.
Using specific examples of external bodies, explain in EACH case why they influence internal decision making on health and safety matters in an organisation.
- Parliament and the legislation it produces
- Enforcing authorities and the powers available to them
- Courts and the legal decisions that they make
- Clients and customers and their expectations
- Contractors and/or competitors and the pressures they might exert
- Trade unions; insurance companies with their ability to increase employer or public liability insurance or even refuse cover
- Public opinion and pressure groups
- Technical standards or professional bodies such as CEN, IOSH and ILO
- Accrediting bodies and consultants and training providers.
How might task analysis may be used to help with hazard identification as part of a risk assessment process.
Task analysis involves breaking down an activity or process into its more detailed constituent parts.
This allows a more systematic identification of the hazards associated with the activity or process to be made and makes for an easier assessment of the scope for human error.
Explain why the number of people exposed to a hazard could affect BOTH the probability AND severity components of risk.
The number of people exposed to a hazard may affect the probability component of risk because:
• With more people exposed, there is a greater chance of someone being affected by the hazard. For example, in the case of a hazard resulting from falling objects or materials, the number of people in ‘the line of fire’ would be critical.
As for the likely severity of the resultant risk:
• The greater number of people affected, the higher the severity will be. The number of people likely to be affected by an explosion is a good practical example.
Types of external UK publications to which an employer may refer when deciding whether the level of risk associated with a specific hazard has been reduced to an acceptable level.
In EACH case, outline how the publication may assist in deciding on acceptable levels of risk.
- Statutes and/or statutory instruments and HSE ACOPs which describe the risk control standards required for compliance with the law
- HSE Guidance which provides guidance on the interpretation of the law and technical advice on risks and risk control standards associated with certain activities and processes
- British Standards which lay down specific standards for instance for machinery and its guarding
- Industry, trade associations and TU guidance and guidance on risk tolerability such as the HSE publication ‘Reducing Risks, Protecting People’.
Possible reasons why a permit system could not being properly adhered to.
Reasons to account for the failure to adhere to a permit to work could include:
- The lack of competence of both the permit issuer and the receiver
- The lack of training and information that has been given
- A poor health and safety culture within the organisation
- Routine violations with a lack of perceived importance of the permit system
- Pressure to complete the task
- Possible complexity and impracticability of the system which makes it difficult to understand
- Inadequate level of supervision
- Lack of routine monitoring and the non-availability of the permit issuer to complete the “sign back” and cancel the permit once the work had been completed
The principles of cost-benefit analysis
The preparation of a cost-benefit analysis would involve:
- Calculating the total costs, including the capital and ongoing costs of each option
- Wherever possible, the benefits that would accrue from the use of the proposed system should be quantified and these would include process efficiency gains, lower operating costs and a reduction in accidents and cases of ill-health and their associated costs
- Once the costs and benefits of the proposal have been quantified, a comparison should then be made and presented
A prosecution under the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 may be brought summarily or on indictment.
Identify the criminal courts that may hear the prosecution when it is brought for the first time.
AND
Outline routes of appeal that could be pursued
following a conviction.
Summary offences:
Magistrates Only
Indictable Offences:
Crown Court
Triable Either Way:
Mag or Crown
Routes of Appeal:
Mag > Crown > HCQBD or Court of Appeal (Criminal) > Supreme Court
Or…
Mag > HCQBD > Supreme Court
A child is struck by a train after getting onto a railway line through a section of damaged fencing.
The fencing had been damaged for some time and the damage had been reported to the body in control of the railway two months previously.
In relation to the body that is occupying or in control of the railway in these circumstances:
Identify the statute that creates civil liability
Occupiers Liability Act 1984
Nature of the duties AND the key provisions of this statute:
Under the statute, occupiers or controllers of premises or land owe a duty of care to unlawful visitors to take such care of their safety as is reasonable in all the circumstances.
For the duty to apply:
• The occupier must be aware of the danger or have reasonable grounds to believe it exists
• They must have reasonable grounds to believe that a person is or may come into the vicinity of the danger
• The risk must be one against which the occupier might reasonably be expected to offer some protection
In appropriate cases warnings or other steps to discourage people from incurring the risk may discharge the duty.
Witness interviews are an important part of the information-gathering process of an accident investigation.
Describe the requirements of an interview process that would help to obtain the best quality of information from witnesses
- Interview as soon as possible after the event though it may be necessary to postpone the interview if the witness is injured or in shock
- Providing a suitable environment for the interview
- Interviewing one witness at a time
- Putting the witness at ease and establishing a good rapport with him or her taking care to stress the preventive purpose of the investigation rather than the apportioning of blame
- Explaining the purpose of the interview and the need to record it
- Using an appropriate questioning technique to establish key facts and avoiding leading questions or implied conclusions
- Using appropriate sketches, photographs or a visit to the scene of the accident to help with the interview
- Listening to the witness without interruptions and allowing them sufficient time to give answers
- Summarising and checking agreement at the end of the interview.
- Possible need to adjust language to suit the witness and the use of interpreters for those where English is not the first language
- Clarifying what was actually witnessed as opposed to deduced
- Inviting the witnesses to have someone accompany them if they so wish
- Showing appreciation at the end of the interview.
Explain why accident / incident ratio studies are often depicted as a triangle
The triangle is used to represent the relative increase in numbers with lower severity outcomes.
How can raw accident / incident data be converted into the type of results which are normally shown in an accident / incident ratio study triangle.
The raw data is classified by the severity of the outcome such as for example, Fatality, Major Injury, Minor Injury, Near Misses, Unsafe Acts.
The numerical ratios of the severity outcomes are calculated to give “1” as the outcome of highest severity
Explain the reasons why, in practice, the ratios of accident / incident outcomes in an organisation always follow this triangular pattern.
There are a number of reasons why the ratios of outcomes in an organisation follow a similar pattern. Whilst many, but not all, low severity incidents have the potential to cause higher severity injuries, the probabilities dictate that most incidents do not result in a high severity outcome.
Another factor which may have a bearing could be the investment of more resources to prevent those incidents which are perceived as having a high severity outcome.
Explain the implications of accident / incident ratio studies for accident and incident investigation arrangements and resourcing.
The implications of accident ratio studies for accident and incident investigation
arrangements and the allocation of resources are that:
- All accidents and incidents should be investigated and the resources applied should be based on the potential loss rather than the actual loss
- The outcome of an accident/incident depends on local circumstances and alternative outcomes for the same unplanned event are possible
- It is important to investigate near misses, property damage and minor injuries which are often overlooked because of a lack of serious outcome since near misses often have identical root causes to serious incidents and can reveal management system failures before serious incidents occur.
General types of health and safety related information that an employer should obtain before appointing a contractor
The client would need to obtain:
- Learning of the contractor’s experience in carrying out similar work
- References from other clients on their satisfaction on the way their contract was
- completed.
- Standards to be followed in the design / construction and the procedures in place for assessing risks and controlling quality during the design / construction stage as well as evidence of the qualifications and experience of individual design personnel.
- Information should be obtained on the contractor’s current safety policy
- Information on arrangements for managing health and safety on site
- Resources that would be allocated to this particular aspect of the contract
- Examples of completed risk assessments and method statements
- Performance measures such as accident rates, inspection reports, enforcement notices and audit reports
- Membership of a relevant professional body.
- Qualifications and competency of those employees to be engaged in the installation work with the procedures to be adopted for the selection of sub-contractors if these were needed.
- Contractor’s possession of adequate insurance cover related to public and product liability should have been ensured.
SECTION 6 HSWA
It shall be the duty of any person who designs, manufactures, imports or supplies any article for use at work or any article of fairground equipment—
a) to ensure, SFAIRP that the article is so designed and constructed that it will be safe and without risks to health at all times when it is being set, used, cleaned or maintained by a person at work;
b) to carry out or arrange for the carrying out of such testing and examination as may be necessary for the performance of the duty imposed on him by the preceding paragraph;
c) to take such steps as are necessary to secure that persons supplied by that person with the article are provided with adequate information about the use for which the article is designed or has been tested and about any conditions necessary to ensure that it will be safe and without risks to health at all such times as are mentioned in paragraph (a) above and when it is being dismantled or disposed of; and
d) to take such steps as are necessary to secure, SFAIRP, that persons so supplied are provided with all such revisions of information provided to them by virtue of the preceding paragraph as are necessary by reason of its becoming known that anything gives rise to a serious risk to health or safety.
Practical reasons why a train driver may not have perceived
a signal correctly and as a result crashed and outline actions that could be taken in order to help reduce the likelihood of a recurrence of this incident
• Driver’s perception may have been distorted by fatigue / drugs / alcohol / medication
• Colour definition may have been impaired by sunlight / defective vision
• Signal fault may have indicated wrong colour
• Distraction may have led to incorrect interpretation of signal
• Signal obscured / visible for too short a time
• Expectation that signal would be “clear” led to false assumption
• Unusual configuration of signal may have led driver to misinterpret signal
Steps to reduce the likelihood of a recurrence include:
• Careful recruitment / selection procedures - competence / aptitude / fitness / health / vision
• Re-design signal / Re-position / Standardise format
• Cab / task design to minimise distractions - ergonomic considerations
• Driver involvement / consultation on design / visibility / operational issues - cab glazing / reflections etc
• Signal maintenance
• Driver training - route familiarity / Provide driver with information - signalling / SPADs etc
• Consultation / Supervision
• Refresher training / Breaks / shift rotation
• Drug / alcohol testing regime
• Encourage near-miss / SPAD reporting and disseminate information
• Provide sunglasses / visors or Install warning systems
How safety tours could contribute to improving health and safety performance AND to improving health and safety culture within a company.
Performance and Culture can be improved by:
• Helping to identify compliance or noncompliance with performance standards and, by repetition in the same area, indicating an improving or worsening trend and checking the implementation and effectiveness of agreed courses of action.
• When carried out in different areas, they can point up common organisational health and safety problems and may identify opportunities for improved performance through the observations of the tour members or by their conversations with employees during the tour.
• When tours are carried out on an unscheduled basis, there is the additional benefit of observing normal standards of behaviour rather than those specifically adopted for the event.
• Tours may also help to improve the health and safety culture of an organisation particularly if they are led on a regular basis by members of management indicating their commitment to the cause.
• Additionally, prompt remedial action for deficiencies noted enhances the perception of the priority given to health and safety matters whilst the involvement of employees in the tours will again encourage ownership and improve their perception of the importance of the subject, particularly if the findings of the tours are shared with the workforce on a regular basis.
Issues that should be considered when planning a
health and safety inspection programme.
who, what, where and when.
• Composition and competence of the inspection team
• The specific areas of the workplace to be inspected
• The frequency and timings of the inspections which may have to be more frequent in
• higher risk areas with a decision being made as to whether the inspections would take
• place at peak working times or during slow periods and whether they should be
• planned or unannounced
• The method of carrying out the inspections and whether check lists should be prepared and if so by whom
• The possible need to provide personal protective equipment for the inspection team
• The involvement of the workforce in consultation on the proposed programme
• The need to obtain senior management support and commitment for the inspection programme
• Consulting previous inspection reports and researching applicable legislation and standards
• Deciding on procedures to be followed after the inspection to ensure appropriate remedial action is taken.
• Reviewing previous findings, legal requirements, costs and resources and reporting on the results of the inspection
A Managing Director wishes to dismiss two employees who he has described as `troublemakers’ for reporting a near miss to the HSE, who subsequently issues enforcement notices
Explain the advice you would give the Managing Director with respect to the proposed disciplinary action against the employees who have complained
Advise that:
• The matter involves a protected disclosure under the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998
• Action at an Employment Tribunal may result
• Negative effect on H&S culture if the two employees are disciplined over H&S matters
• Need to recognise the root causes of employee concerns
Steps that could be taken to gain the support of the workforce in improving the health and safety culture within the company
- Informal discussions and safety climate questionnaires
- Methods of demonstrating the commitment of the business to the improvement of the safety culture such as the development of a new policy, establishing a health and safety committee, appointing a safety adviser, encouraging informal communication on health and safety, investing in safety training for leaders and staff and emphasising through communication and good example that safety had the same priority as production were all measures that should have been identified
- Steps to increase employee participation were also important and could have included involvement in risk assessments, the development of safe systems of work, inspections, incident
- investigation and team briefing sessions.
An organisation is proposing to move from a health and safety
management system based on the Health and Safety Executive’s HSG65 model to one that aligns itself with ISO45001.
Outline the possible advantages AND disadvantages of such a change.
Advantages:
• Easier integration with other standards such as ISO9001 and allow for integrated management system
• Opportunity to promote company and gain some publicity
• Easier to benchmark performance against other companies who have the certification
• Shows company is committed to continual improvement
• External body certifies the standard and not in house, more creditable to suppliers and employers etc.
Disadvantages:
• System not recognised by HSE, only audit against HSG65
• Costs involved with the change may be expensive
• Time to change will be lengthy taking resources away from other parts of the business
• Increased paperwork
• Complicated
• Audits may not involve HSE professionals if integrated with other management systems
• Non safety professionals might manage the systems without the correct regulatory knowledge
Strengths of using accident rates as a measure of
health and safety performance
- They are a measurable number with defined criteria
- They provide an easy way of plotting trends
- They represent categories of loss events which have actually happened and which are undesirable