UNIT 6: APPEALS + SENTENCING Flashcards
What is the purpose of the new sentencing code?
Code has re-written sentencing procedure with modern language and an overriding aim to bring a clear and logical structure to this area of practice
- Section 57 of the Sentencing Act 2020 states that a court sentencing an offender aged 18 or over must have regard to the following five purposes of sentencing:
- the punishment of offenders;
- the reduction of crime (including its reduction by deterrence);
- the reform and rehabilitation of offenders;
- the protection of the public; and
- the making of reparation by offenders to persons affected by their offence.
* Regard is not needed where sentences are fixed by law or offences subject to a statutory minimum, or if the defendant is classed as a dangerous offender
Who prepares and updates the sentencing guidelines
Sentencing council
Who forms the sentencing council?
8 Judicial and 6 Non Judicial Members
What must SC consider
o current sentencing practice
o the need to promote consistency in sentencing
o the impact of sentencing decisions on victims of crime
o the need to promote public confidence in the criminal justice system
o the cost of different sentences and their effectiveness in reducing re-offending
o the SC’s monitoring of the application of the guidelines
Court and SC
- Every court has a duty to follow any relevant guidelines unless it is satisfied that it would be contrary to the interests of justice to do so.
What is considered for seriousness
- the offender’s culpability in committing the offence, and
- any harm which the offence
- caused,
- was intended to cause, or
- might foreseeably have caused
Culpability
- Guidance identifies four levels of criminal culpability for sentencing purposes – in descending order of seriousness they are where the offender:
1. has the intention to cause harm, with the highest culpability being when an offence is planned. The worse the harm intended, the greater the seriousness;
2. is reckless as to whether harm is caused. This covers situations when the defendant appreciates that some harm would be caused but goes ahead, giving no thought to the consequences even though the extent of the risk would be obvious to most people;
3. has knowledge of the specific risks entailed by their actions, even though the offender does not intend to cause the harm that results;
4. is guilty of negligence.
Harm
- Harm may be caused either to individuals, or to the community at large.
- The types of harm that may be caused include:
1. physical injury
2. sexual violation
3. financial loss
4. damage to health and
5. psychological distress.
Prevalence
- In exceptional circumstances, a court in a particular area may treat an offence more seriously than elsewhere
- EG if the particular type of offence is prevalent in the area and the court has before it evidence that these offences are causing harm to the community at large
Statutory aggravating factors
- Previous convictions
court must have reasonable regard to the nature of the conviction and time that has elapsed since it
ie similar convictions and recency - Offences committed whilst on bail
particularly if D was on bail in respect of another offence at the time of the current offence - Racial or religious aggravation
any racial or religious motive for committing the offence - Hostility based on sexual orientation or disability
any hostility towards the victim of an offence based on that victim’s sexual orientation or any physical or mental disability
Aggravating factors
- offences that are planned or premeditated;
- offenders operating in groups or gangs;
- the deliberate targeting of vulnerable groups (such as the elderly or disabled victims);
- offences committed whilst under the influence of drink or drugs;
- the use of a weapon;
- deliberate and gratuitous violence or damage to property, beyond that required to carry out the offence;
- offences involving the abuse of a position of trust;
- offences committed against those working in the public sector or providing a service to the public;
- in property offences, the high value (including sentimental value) of property to the victim; and
- failure to respond to previous sentences.
Mitigating factors
- offences where the defendant has acted on impulse;
- when the defendant has experienced a greater degree of provocation than normally expected;
- defendants who are suffering from mental illness or physical disability;
- if the defendant is particularly young or old (particularly in the case of young offenders who are immature and have been led astray by others);
- the fact that the defendant played only a minor role in the offending;
- defendants who were motivated by genuine fear; and
- defendants who have made attempts to make reparation to their victim
Reduction of guilty plea consideration
- s 73 SA: court must ‘take into account’ the stage in the proceedings at which D gave their indication of a guilty plea and the circumstances in which it was given
- Applies to ALL defendants aged 18 or over, to ALL cases regardless of the offence(s) at both MC and CC
Is the reduction dependent on or affected by the strength of the prosecution case or whether D feels remorse?
No
When will a full one-third discount on sentence be permitted
where a guilty plea is indicated at the ‘first stage of proceedings’
o on a guilty plea at the first hearing in the magistrates’ court;
o on a guilty plea at the first hearing in the magistrates’ court where the case is then committed for sentence to the Crown Court;
o on indication of a guilty plea in the magistrates’ court to an offence triable only on indictment, followed by a guilty plea at the first hearing in the Crown Court.
Exception to discount rule
exceptions may entitle D to the full third reduction if it would have been unreasonable to expect D to indicate a guilty plea at this first hearing
Max discount after this first stage
o the one-quarter discount will be awarded where the guilty plea is only first indicated at the PTPH
When should the 1/4 discount be decreased to 1/10
- Reduction should be decreased from 1/4 to a maximum of 1/10 where a guilty plea is entered on the first day the trial was meant to take place (’at the door of the court’)
o May be reduced further, even to zero, where it is entered during the course of trial
If at magistrates’ court, when D’s case was sent to the Crown Court, is a ‘likely guilty plea’ - is a full credit 1/3 reduction possible?
NO
where at the magistrates’ court it is not procedurally possible for a defendant to enter a guilty plea, there must be an unequivocal indication of the defendant’s intention to plead guilty. An indication only that he is likely to plead guilty is not enough’.
What is the totality principle
- The court will take into account both the offence they are being sentenced for and any associated offences
- Associated offence = offence for which D has been convicted in the same proceedings or for which they are to be sentenced at the same time, or an offence which D has asked the court to take into consideration when passing sentence
Neil is convicted of three separate offences of theft in the same proceedings. When Neil is being sentenced, the court will not look at each offence separately, but will rather assess the total extent of Neil’s offending in determining the sentence that Neil will be given. Only if the totality of Neil’s offending passes the appropriate thresholds (see below) may a custodial or community sentence be imposed by the court.
Offences taken into consideration
- D’s being sentenced for one offence may ask the court to take other offences into consideration (TIC) when considering the sentence
- EG D may have committed several similar types of offence which are yet to be prosecuted, but for which they may subsequently face prosecution
o it is in D’s interests that all matters outstanding (or potentially outstanding) are dealt with at the same time - Common practice: police to present D with a list of additional offences for which they are under investigation and may subsequently be charged
- The offences TIC should be of a similar nature to, or less serious than, the offence(s) for which D has been convicted
- Court’s discretion on how to consider these additional offences, but typically will increase the sentence D receives, but may also add little to nothing
- Advantage:
o for D: ‘wipe the slate clean’ because they will not subsequently be prosecuted for such offences
o for Police: a large number of TICs improves their clear-up rates without the need to commence a fresh prosecution against D
STEP 1 – Determining the offence 3 categories?
- Category 1 offences reflect both greater harm and enhanced culpability
- Category 2 offences reflect either greater harm or enhanced culpability
- Category 3 offences are those involving lesser harm and a lower level of culpability
* There is an exhaustive list of factors to determine which category will be most appropriate for the relevant offence
What happens once the starting point is determined?
- Once the category is determined, the court must use the corresponding starting point sentence which will then be further shaped by the remaining steps
- NB. the starting point is UNAFFECTED by previous convictions or how D pleads etc.
STEP 2 – Shaping the provisional sentence: starting point and category range
- Refer to aggravating and mitigating factors (above)
- Also must consider the relevant statutory thresholds for custody
STEP 3 – Consider any factors which indicate a reduction in sentence, such as assisting the prosecution
- Court can reduce the sentence where the offender has provided assistance to the police, usually in relation to other matters
STEP 4 – Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea
- NB. consider at what stage the plea was given
STEP 5 – Imposing an extended sentence
circumstances as to when a court will be required to consider imposing an extended sentence
* EG where it is a ‘dangerous offender’
STEP 6 – Totality principle
- Consider where an offender is being sentenced for multiple offences
STEP 7 – Compensation and other ancillary orders
- Court has a duty to consider whether or not to order D to pay compensation and/or make other appropriate ancillary orders, eg confiscation, destruction, and forfeiture orders
STEP 8 - Giving reasons
court must give reasons for the sentence it is imposing
* Includes explaining to D the effect of
o the sentence that has been passed, and
o non-compliance with the sentence, and
o identify the definitive sentencing guidelines that have been followed, including an explanation of why the court has imposed a lesser sentence than recommended in the guidelines if that is the case
R v Arie Ali
sentencing judge erred in imposing a sentence of immediate custody for an offence of assaulting an emergency worker. The Court of Appeal reasoned that when the courts are considering sentencing an offence that crosses the threshold for a short custodial sentence, judges and magistrates can elect to suspend the sentence or impose a community order instead
courts can take into account the impact of the current prison population levels when making that decision as an exceptional factor to justify suspending a custodial sentence
Concurrent vs consecutive sentence
- Relevant where the court is sentencing a D to a custodial sentence for 2 or more offences
- Separate sentences of imprisonment may be expressed by the sentencing court to be either concurrent or consecutive
- Concurrent sentence = the custodial terms are deemed to be served at the same time
- Consecutive sentence = one custodial sentence will start after the other one has finished
o generally not imposed where matters of fact arise out of the same incident
eg [in the below example] if wounding and theft occurred at the same time in relation to the same victim, concurrent sentences would be more likely
o does not need to be offences arising from the same incident, ie through application of the totality principle
Totality guideline
when sentencing for more than one offence, overriding principle of totality is that the overall sentence should:
1. Reflect all of the offending behaviour with reference to overall harm + culpability w/ aggravating and mitigating factors relating to the offences and those personal to the offender;
2. And be just and proportionate
Structuring a consecutive sentence
usually impossible to arrive at just + proportionate sentence by adding together notional single sentences – some downward adjustment ordinarily required.
Structuring a concurrent sentence
- Concurrent: notional sentence on any single offence will not adequately reflect overall offending. Upward adjustment required + may go outside category range appropriate for a single offence.
Fourfold approach to concurrent/consecutive sentencing?
The Sentencing Council recommends that the general approach should be fourfold:
*
Consider the sentence for each individual offence, referring to the relevant sentencing
guidelines.
*
Determine whether the case calls for concurrent or consecutive sentences. When
sentencing three or more offences, a combination of concurrent and consecutive
sentences may be appropriate.
*
Test the overall sentence against the requirement that the total sentence is just and
proportionate to the offending as a whole.
*
Consider and explain how the sentence is structured in a way that will be best understood
by all concerned.
Concurrent sentence guidance
Concurrent sentences will ordinarily be appropriate where:
*
offences arise out of the same incident or facts;
*
there is a series of offences of the same or similar kind, especially when committed
against the same person.
Examples include:
*
a single incident of dangerous driving resulting in injuries to multiple victims
*
robbery with a weapon where the weapon has been taken into account in categorising
the robbery
*
separate counts of supplying different types of drugs of the same class as part of the
same transaction
*
repetitive small thefts from an employer.
Consecutive sentence guidance
Consecutive sentences will ordinarily be appropriate where:
*
offences arise out of unrelated facts or incidents;
*
offences committed in the same incident are distinct, involving an aggravating element
that requires separate recognition;
*
offences are of the same or similar kind but the overall criminality will not sufficiently be
reflected by concurrent sentences.
Examples include:
*
where the offender commits a theft on one occasion and a common assault against a
different victim on a separate occasion
*
an attempt to pervert the course of justice in respect of another offence also charged
*
where one of the offences is a Bail Act offence such as failing to surrender
*
where the offender is convicted of threats to kill towards a complainant in the context of
an indecent assault on the same occasion, the threats to kill could be distinguished as a
separate element
*
where offences of domestic abuse or sexual offences are committed against the same
individual.
When will a pre-sentencing report be produced?
Where an adult D pleads guilty and sentencing is likely to be at MC, their legal representative can ask the Probation Service to prepare a pre-sentence report before the first hearing
o If the report is produced, the court will decide whether to use it to sentence D
When would the legal representative ask the Probation Service to prepare the report?
o D’s legal rep will only ask the Probation Service to prepare the report if D will:
plead guilty to all offences charged on the full prosecution facts; and
agree to co-operate with the Probation Service to prepare a report.
What must the legal be satisfied about before asking the PS to prepare the report
D is likely to be sentenced in the magistrates’ court;
the offence(s) is serious enough for a community order and a pre-sentence report is likely to be necessary; and
D understands that:
a pre-sentence report before plea provides no indication of any sentence and that all sentencing options remain open to the court;
the court will decide whether to consider the pre-sentence report before plea, if the Probation Service produces one; and
the court may proceed to sentence without a pre-sentence report if the court considers a report unnecessary
When must the sentencing court obtain the report
the sentencing court must obtain and consider a pre-sentence report before forming an opinion on:
whether the custody threshold has been passed and, if it has, how long the custodial sentence should be; and
whether the threshold for imposing a community sentence has been passed and, if it has, the requirements that should be imposed on the defendant under a generic community order.
Is the court required to obtain a report?
o Court is not required to obtain a report if ‘in the circumstances, court considers it unnecessary’
EG where a custodial sentence is inevitable because of the seriousness of the offence or where the court already has a recent pre-sentence report for that offender
SO, s 30 requirement is not obligatory
s 30(4): if a court imposes either a custodial or community sentence before first obtaining or considering such a report, this will not invalidate any resulting sentence
What is a plea by mitigation
- Opportunity to present mitigation to the court = penultimate stage in the sentencing process
- Every D is entitled to this (r 25.16(6) CrimPR)
- One of the most frequent and important functions of defence advocates
- Plea in mitigation usually involves a speech by defence advocate, but can include calling character witnesses on behalf of D or introducing character letters to speak of D’s generally good character