Unit 4 - Scots Criminal Law: Introduction and Investigation Flashcards
Define: Breach of the Peace
“Breach of the Peace is a crime at common law and is constituted by one or more persons conducting himself or themselves in a riotous or disorderly manner, where such conduct is severe enough to cause alarm to ordinary people AND threaten serious disturbance to the community.”
Where can a breach of the peace take place?
The crime can take place ANYWHERE, even in someone’s house (as long as the effects can be heard or experienced from outside the house). There just has to be a PUBLIC ELEMENT to it.
What is meant by the term riotous?
Noise, rowdy-ism, wild or violent behaviour. E.g. a man swearing and making rude gestures at rival supporters at a football match. A person who interrupted and disturbed a Salvation Army meeting.
What is meant by disorderly conduct?
Disorderly = actions that could cause a state of alarm and serious disturbance. If this applies AND the behaviour is outwith what is normal and acceptable, then the crime is complete. Disorderly conduct might not involve noise.
Explain what the requirement is with regards to the public element of a Breach of the Peace incident.
- The behaviour MUST threaten serious disturbance to the community and not just threaten irritation or minor alarm.
- Evidence of actual alarm or that the conduct would be alarming to a reasonable person must be present e.g. witness statement.
- This can be extended to conduct in private if there is a reasonable likelihood of it being discovered.
- Insulting or abusive language to or concerning another person does not constitute a Breach of the Peace unless persistently accompanied by threats or violence.
Public Element =
Any public place where the public are present, or
Any private place, overheard by the public in a public place.
What are the essential elements of Threatening and Abusive behaviour?
An offence for any person to:
- Behave in a threatening or abusive manner (quite subjective what is threatening/abusive. Different from person to person).
- Where the behaviour is likely to cause a reasonable person to suffer fear or alarm and
- The person behaving in such a manner intends the behaviour to cause fear or alarm or,
- Is reckless as to whether the behaviour would cause fear or alarm
Does there have to be a public element to a Threatening and Abusive offence?
No. It can be committed against a single person. It can be committed anywhere, whether in public or a private dwelling.
What might a defence for Threatening and Abusive behaviour be?
The defence can show that the behaviour was reasonable in the particular circumstances.
What Police Powers are available for a Breach of the Peace or S38?
- Power of arrest under Section 1 Criminal Justice Act 2016.
- May also:
- Warn the Culprit
- Issued a Fixed Penalty Notice (only for BoP)
- Report for Summons
- Arrest
When there is a choice between BoP and S38, the statute is preferred over the common law crime i.e. S38 is preferred.
What Statutory alternatives are available to a Breach of the Peace?
- Section 38 is most common (threatening and abusive)
- Section 127 of the Communications Act 2003 (essentially a 38 but for technology e.g. text messages, emails, whatsapps.
- Hoax Calls - Section 1-4 Emergency Workers Act 2005 OR Chapter 7 of the Fire Act 2005 (for incidents involving Fire and Rescue).
- Section 39 of CJL ACT 2010 refers to offence of stalking.
What is stalking?
Where a person engages in a course of conduct (on at least 2 occasions) where either:
- The conduct is intended to cause fear or alarm or,
- The person ought to have known the conduct, in all circumstances would cause fear or alarm and
- It does in fact cause the victim to suffer fear or alarm.
This could include physical or psychological harm, apprehension or fear of safety.
Four distinctive stalking behaviours
FIXATED
OBSESSIVE
UNWANTED
REPEATED
Violence is not always the primary concern for the victim, but rather the persistence and recurrence may cause more distress or concern.
Stalking victims have the right to specify which gender of interviewer they would like. Risk Assessment will be undertaken. Stalking screening questions. Domestic Abuse Questions may also be required if it’s between partners or ex-partner.
Define: Assault.
“A crime at common law, and is every attack directed to take effect physically on the person of another, whether or not actual injury is inflicted”.
- For a charge of assault to be relevant there must be criminal intent (Mens Rea) and a criminal action (Actus Rea).
- Accidental injury, even though caused by a mischievous act, does not amount to assault.
Aiming a blow at someone but missing = ASSAULT
Throwing stones at buses which results in injury = NOT ASSAULT.
It depends on intent.
Explain the different types of assault.
- Direct - deliberate and direct physical attack on a person by e.g. punching, kicking, stabbing.
- Indirect - Setting a dog on someone.
- Menaces - Verbal threats are not enough in themselves to constitute the crime of assault but threatening gestures inducing a state of bodily fear are sufficient, whether or not accompanied by menacing words. E.g aggressively pointing a knife at someone within reach, aiming a firearm (even if unloaded).
- Aggravations of Assault - An aggravation of any crime, including assault, increases the gravity of the crime and may influence the PF’s decision when considering proceedings in the case. If found guilty of assault with aggravated circumstances, an accused person is likely to receive a heavier sentence from the court.
How might an assault be aggravated?
DIMPLES!
- Danger to victim e.g. pushing a person into moving traffic, down stairs or from a height will have more serious consequences.
- Intent - Where an assault takes place with intent to commit a more serious crime e.g. rape, to kill, then charge with assault and attempted murder or attempted rape.
- Mode of perpetration - e.g. firearm, knife, corrosive acid.
- Persons character - character of victim and/or accused. Victim (on a child or pregnant woman or infirm person). Accused (positions of trust e.g. police officer, teacher, social worker, carer.
- Locus of assault - e.g. in a victim’s own home where it should be a safe space.
- Extent of injury - life endangered, serious injury, broken bones, permanent disfigurement.
- Statutory Hate Crime - An assault which is motivated by hate is rightly considered Hate Crime. “A crime motivated by malice or ill-will towards a social group”. Any hate crime assault is aggravated.
Is there such a thing as justified assault?
- Under the authority of the law (e.g. police officers when arresting) OR
- In self-defence (of yourself or others, not property).
Note: only the minimum force necessary to be used.
Provocation - Assaulting a person as a result of provocation would not be considered justifiable, although the circumstances of provocation may be grounds for mitigation at the time of sentencing.
Which assaults are dealt with using statute law?
- Section 1 of the Protection of Workers Act 2021 - an offence to assault, threaten or abuse a person who is a retail worker and who is engaged at the time of the incident in retail work. Aggravated would be if it was relating to enforcing age restrictions on items.
- Section 90 of the Police and Fire Reform Act 2012 relates to a person assaulting, resisting, obstructing or hindering a Constable in the execution of his or her duty.
- Section 1 of the Emergency Workers Act 2005 refers to assaulting, obstructing or hindering someone who is acting in the capacity of a police constable, firefighter, ambulance worker, doctor, nurse or midwife.
- Sections 16, 17 and 18 of the Firearms Act 1968 refer to the use of firearms by criminals to assault, resist or instil fear into others.
What is Culpable and Reckless Conduct?
- Common law crime.
- Culpable and reckless acts which cause injury to others or which create a risk of injury.
- Must be more than a genuine and innocent accident, however careless.
- The reckless behaviour must show an utter disregard for the consequences.
- The act need not be an overt act.
E.g. dropping a glass bottle from 15th floor.
E.g. knowingly infecting someone with HIV.
E.g. denying to a Police Officer that you have a needle in your pocket before a search.
Is Accession a crime?
NO!!!!! Accession is NOT A CRIME or OFFENCE in its own right. It is a legal concept. It is a legal term used to describe the principle that:-
- Everyone who participates in a crime or offence is equally liable, no matter what part they played.
- Principal = the person who actually commits the crime.
- Accessories = anyone who aids the perpetrator with advice or assistance before or at the time of the crime/offence, or who acts in concert by watching whilst the crime or offence is committed.
- Abettors = a person who incites, instigates, encourages or counsels another to commit a crime or offence.
To be guilty of a crime or offence by accession, the person must have guilty knowledge of the specific crime or offence. What is meant by guilty knowledge?
Guilty Knowledge = mens rea
- A person is only guilty of a crime or offence by accession if they have guilty knowledge of the specific crime or offence.
- A general suspicion that the assistance they are giving is for a criminal act is not enough.
- Because there must be guilty knowledge, there can only be accession before or during the crime.
- There can be NO ACCESSION AFTER a crime has been committed.
The principals, accessories and abettors would all be charged with the same crime or offence. However, if found guilty, the court may deal with them differently e.g. an abettor who planned the crime, may be dealt with more severely.
Define Wasting Police Time and outline it’s essential elements.
- Causing Police resources to be diverted to deal with false complaints or allegations which are entirely without foundation.
Definition: “A crime at common law, committed by any person who maliciously makes a false statement to the police, with the intention and effect of causing unnecessary police investigations”.
Essential Elements:
- It is not essential that a particular person be named in the false statement.
- Damage may be caused to the public interest by diverting police resources from normal duties to the needless investigation of the invented story.
- Can vary in nature and should be dealt with on an individual basis.
Define “Attempt to Pervert the Course of Justice” and give some examples of this.
“A crime at common law which can be described as any overt and intentional action calculated, to interfere with either the normal investigation of a crime, or the bringing of an offender to justice”.
Examples
- Destroying or concealing evidence.
- Requesting a witness to refrain from identifying an accused.
- Assisting a suspect to evade capture.
- Tampering with drink/drug blood samples.
- Providing a false name or address.
What is Perjury and what are the essential elements of Perjury?
“Perjury is a crime at common law, committed by any person who wilfully makes a false statement under oath or affirmation equivalent to oath”.
Essential elements:
- Falsehood must be made under oath or affirmation in civil or criminal proceedings.
- It must be proved to be false and that the accused knew it was false.
- It must relate to evidence of fact. It is not perjury if due to faulty recollection or misunderstanding.
- It must be direct and unequivocal.
- It must be relevant to the point at issue. It is not perjury if the evidence is irrelevant or incompetent.
Define Subornation of Perjury and give an example.
“Subornation of Perjury is a crime at common law, committed by any person who counsels or induces, by any means, a person to give false testimony in judicial proceedings”.
Examples - murder trials where witnesses are threatened by the accused or their associates. Threat of violence unless false testimony given. It may not be violence used, it could be bribery.
The crime is NOT complete, UNLESS the witness submits to the inducement and gives false evidence.
What is attempted Subornation of Perjury?
- Attempted subornation of perjury is complete as soon as any inducement or intimidation has been made.
- Example: a witness is approached, inducement offered or intimidation made but witness reports it to the police before the witness goes to court.
“A crime at common law committed by any person who counsels or induces, by any means, a person to give false testimony in judicial proceedings.”
What does it mean to be in contempt of court?
“An intentional disrespect or an action against the court’s authority”.
Examples:
- Failing to attend court when cited.
- An accused, witness, juror or police officer attending court under the influence of alcohol.
- Refusing to take the oath or affirmation.
- Wilfully misleading the court by giving inconsistent or contradictory evidence.
- Refusing to answer questions allowed by the court.
- Allowing a mobile/airwave to sound in court.
What is theft?
“A crime at common law, and is taking or appropriating of property without the consent of the rightful owner or other lawful authority”.
Essential Elements for Theft
- There was appropriation of property - by taking, finding or other conduct that deprives the owner of their right to enjoy the property.
- The taking was felonious (criminal in nature) - the thief had no lawful authority to take the property and took it without permission.
- There was intent to deprive the owner - permanently or temporarily.
- The property belonged to another - you must prove it belonged to someone else.
For something to have been stolen, it must:
- Belong to someone else
- Be a physical thing AND
- Be able to be moved.
Explain the Power of Search that Constables have in relation to Theft.
- Section 60 of the Civic Government (Scotland) Act 1982:
Where a Constable has reasonable grounds to suspect that a person is in possession of any stolen property, a Constable may, without warrant: - Search that person or anything in their possession and detain them for as long as is necessary for the purpose of the search.
- Enter and search any vehicle or vessel where the Constable suspects that the stolen property may be found and for that purpose require the person in control of that vehicle or vessel to stop it and keep it stopped.
- Enter and search any premises occupied by a second hand dealer or a metal dealer for the purpose of their business.
- Seize and detain anything found in the course of such search which appears to be stolen or be evidence to the commission of theft.
What is the Doctrine of Recent Possession?
There may be circumstances where you find it difficult to satisfy the essential elements of theft, but where the facts are such that it is easy for you to infer that a suspect has committed the crime of theft shortly before. The doctrine of recent possession allows you to deal with these circumstances.
Theft may be proved against the accused by showing that:-
- The property was stolen, and
- Shortly thereafter it was traced to the physical or constructive possession of the accused, and
- There is no reasonable explanation of such possession given
- There are other incriminating circumstances.
How can a theft be aggravated?
Aggravated = more serious.
Theft by housebreaking.
Theft by opening a lockfast place.
- Housebreaking on it’s own IS NOT A CRIME. The act of breaking in and thereafter stealing, is an aggravation of the common law crime of theft. Known as THEFT BY HOUSEBREAKING.
“Theft by housebreaking is constituted whenever the security of the house is violated and some article abstracted or removed for the purpose of being carried off. It is not essential that the thief should have actually entered the building. The theft is complete if, for example, he draws the article towards him with some implement, even although he does not get the article into his hand.”
There must be:
- An overcoming of the security of the house;
And - Unauthorised appropriation of property (from within the house)
And - Felonious intent to deprive the owner.
What counts as a house with regards to a Theft by Housebreaking?
“any dwelling or other roofed building, finished or unfinished, or any part of a building used as a separate dwelling, which is secured against intrusion by unauthorised person”.
Examples: Domestic dwellings e.g. caravans, houses, boarding house, garage, bedrooms within hotel. Domestic non-dwellings e.g. domestic garages, garden huts/sheds, outhouses. Other e.g. portacabins, commercial premises, factories, show houses, barns.
What Practical Considerations should you consider when attending a Theft by Housebreaking?
- Possible use of Police Dog Handler as dogs are trained to follow human scent, and the immediate attendance of a dog handler can greatly increase the chances of affecting an apprehension. If do use Dog, then all entrance/exits should be covered and no-one should enter the property as it will negate the use of a dog due to compromising the scent.
- Be sure to preserve any potential track. Consider using a cordon to ensure no public enter the area.
- Heavy rain or winds can make tracking much more difficult and reduces effectiveness of the Dog.
- Better at tracking over grass or soft surfaces (up to 2 hours old), where as on hard surfaces (only 30 mins from time of incident.
What are the different modes of entry that theft by housebreaking can be committed?
PUT US OFF
- Possession (unauthorised use of key e.g. by an employee returning at night)
- Unusual Opening (e.g. using a chimney, sewer, pub trap door.
- Trickery (e.g. door left open on purpose, undoing a window latch in pub toilet, ringing door bell and pushing past).
- Unlocked Window - If the window is open AND fair distance then Theft by Housebreaking. If it’s a ground floor and suspect only leans in window, then only theft (unless pushes the window open further).
- Stolen Key
- Overcoming the Lock - Door is securely locked and overcome by lock picking, false key or skeleton keys.
- Found Key - e.g. raking around to find a spare key under a doormat.
- Force
It is not theft by housebreaking to conceal yourself within a premise, steal when the premises are closed, and then break out. It’s merely theft (and possibly vandalism if cause damage).
What is Theft by Opening a Lockfast Place?
- It’s not a crime itself.
- Whenever the security of the lockfast place is overcome and the contents are stolen.
The Essential Elements
- Overcoming of the security of the lockfast place, and
- Unauthorised appropriation of property (from within the lockfast place), and
- Intent to deprive the owner.
Note: The overcoming of the security of the lockfast place MUST take place BEFORE the property is appropriated. Therefore, if a lockfast place is removed, and then broken into later at a different locus, the crime would be theft (the theft of the lockfast place and it’s contents).
What counts as a Lockfast Place?
“Rooms, cupboards, drawers, safes, desks, cashboxes, show-cases and any other receptacle the contents of which are protected by lock and key.”
They all must be LOCKED to count.
E.g. a thief reaches in the window of a car, releases the lock to gain access and steals something, then this is Theft by OLP. However, if the thief only reached in, then just theft.
Explain what is meant by Attempted Theft.
- The law recognises the “attempt” to commit the crime is also criminal, and the crime that would be libelled is “attempted theft”.
E.g. pickpocket trying to steal from an empty pocket.
E.g. attempting to steal a wheel and being disturbed by the police before all the wheel nuts have been removed.
What is meant by Housebreaking with Intent to Steal?
Examples:
- Breaking into the house by forcing the rear door, entering the property intending to steal but being disturbed by the owner returning before anything can be taken.
- Breaking into a house by smashing a window, rummaging through drawers etc. looking for valuables, but leaving empty handed when nothing is found.
What is meant by Attempted Housebreaking with Intent to Steal?
Unsuccessful attempt is made to break into any building with the intent to steal. Neither the housebreaking or the theft is successful but the intention is still there.
E.g. attempting to force open a front door of a house using a jemmy but being unable to overcome the locks and gain entry.
E.g. an unsuccesful attempt to force a window lock using a scredriver.
What is OLPWI?
- Opening a Lockfast Place with Intent to Steal
- When a lockfast place is broken into with the intent to steal, but nothing is stolen. This charge is relevant even if the lockfast place is empty. The opening has been successful but the theft has not.
- Examples:
- Breaking into a car by forcing a door, entering the vehicle but being disturbed by the owner returning before anything can be stolen.
- Breaking into a payphone by forcing the cashbox with a jemmy, but leaving empty handed when no cash is found within.
What is Attempted Opening a Lockfast Place with Intent to Steal?
When an unsuccessful attempt is made to break into a lockfast place with the intent to steal. The opening itself, and therefore the theft, has not been successful.
Examples:
- Attempting to force open the passenger door of a vehicle using a scredriver but being unable to overcome the locks and gain entry.
- Attempting to break into an ATM to steal cash, but being unable to force the lock.
What happens if there are a combination of charges present?
- Combination of theft by opening a lockfast place AND theft by housebreaking.
- In these circumstances, the charge libelled would be theft by housebreaking and opening a lockfast place.
What is meant by the term Reset and what are the essential elements of the crime?
Reset is when something that has been dishonestly obtained is sold or passed on to someone else. Often a link between this and organised crime - profits are used to fund the organised crime.
“Reset is a crime at common law, committed by any person with the intent to deprive the owner, to receive and keep property, knowing that it had been appropriated by theft, robbery, embezzlement or fraud.”
A person who has been involved with the original theft, cannot be charged with reset. They would just be charged for theft.
Essential Elements
The PROSECUTION must prove:
- Guilty Knowledge (the accused knew the property had been stolen e.g. £1000 laptop sold for £40 in a pub, e.g. property concealed, e.g. altered appearance).
- Criminal Intent (intent to deprive owner. The crime is complete as soon as it’s passed to the resetter (even if only momentarily)).
- Receipt of Property (handling stolen property OR having control of the property even though they don’t have physical possession). “Put them in the usual place”.
- Property Dishonestly Obtained (obtained via theft, robbery, embezzlement or fraud).
Ideally during an investigation we would identify the Thief and the Resetter. However, it is not necessary to find the thief in order to charge the resetter.
How can Evidence of Previous convictions be used to prove the guilt of someone accused of reset?
- When a person is charged with resetting stolen property, evidence that a person has been found in possession of stolen property in the previous 12 months can be taken into consideration for the purpose of proving that the person knew the property was stolen.
- If this is to be used, the Accused must be given at least 7 days’ notice in writing that it is intended to lead such evidence.
Define Robbery and state the essential elements of the crime.
“A crime at common law committed by any person, who feloniously appropriates property, by means of violence or threats of violence”.
Punishable by imprisonment and the power of arrest is under Section 1 of the Criminal Justice Act 2016.
Essential Elements:
- Violence or the threat of violence (threats can be verbal or using weapons (loaded or not).
- The violence or threat must be offered AT THE SAME TIME as the property is taken.
- As well as the violence there must be intent to feloniously appropriate (steal) the property (it is not robbery to assault someone out of malice and then take the opportunity to take their wallet as an after thought).
- The robber must take possession of the property (even momentarily)
Robbery and Theft are two different crimes. One is not an aggravation of another.
What does Section 178 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 relate to?
Section 178 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 known as taking and driving away a motor vehicle, was initially created to cover the activity commonly referred to as “joy-riding”. Essentially a theft but the essential element of “an intent to deprive the owner of their property” was not there.
Section 178(1)(a) of the Road Traffic Act 1988 states that a person who:-
- Takes and drives away a motor vehicle
- Without the consent of the owner, or
- Other lawful authority
Shall be guilty of an offence.
Essential Elements
- The motor vehicle has been taken away (taken using stolen true key, unattended car with engine running, forced entry or hotwiring, “carjacked”).
- The motor vehicle has been driven (being in control of the speed and direction of the vehicle”.)
- There was no consent from the owner (e.g. a man is given permission to take the car from A to B but then adds in more stops - he has not had consent for the additional journey). Note: a statement from the owner in relation to not having given consent should be noted as soon as reasonably practicable).
- There was no other lawful authority (e.g. a Police Officer driving a vehicle seized as a production).
What does Section 178(1)(b) of the Road Traffic Act 1988 refer to?
Section 178(1)(b) of the Road Traffic Act 1988
A person who:
- Knowing that a motor vehicle has been so taken
- Drives it or allows themselves to be carried in or on it
- Without such consent or authority
Shall be guilty of an offence.
Essential Elements:
- Knowledge that the motor vehicle has been taken without the owner’s consent or other lawful authority (didn’t need to be present at the time but needs to know it has been). Evidence of this E.g. broken windows, damaged locks, unusual method to start vehicle, behaviour when you stop the vehicle.
- Driven the motor vehicle or allowed themselves to be carried (i.e. not carried against their will e.g. tried to get out).
- No consent of the owner
- No lawful authority
What is a statutory defence for a Section 178 offence?
Section 178(2) of the Road Traffic Act 1988 provides that a person accused of offences Section 178(1)(a) and (b) cannot be convicted if the defence can prove that either the accused had acted with the reasonable belief that:-
- They had lawful authority, or
- The owner would have granted permission had they been asked for it.
REMEMBER - a statutory defence does not stop you from charging or arresting someone. It’s just evidence that the suspect should present in court.
How do you distinguish between theft and a Section 178 offence?
- If the car has been taken temporarily and then merely abandoned = Contravention of Section 178.
- If there is some indication that there is intent to deprive the owner permanently e.g. burning out the vehicle then abandoning it, “ringing” the vehicle (selling on to an unsuspected buyer) or breaking the vehicle for spares, then the relevant charge would be theft.
What would the crime be if someone was caught the culprit in the act before being able to drive the vehicle away?
Either attempted Section 178(1)(a) offence OR attempted theft.
How are vehicle pursuits connected to Section 178 offences and what should you do in that situation?
- Failure of driver to stop when signalled to do so may raise suspicion that a Section 178 offence has taken place but there may be other reason why they fail to stop.
- If a pursuit happens, you should make the Control Room aware immediately. Direction will then be provided on what actions you should take e.g. follow the vehicle and keep it in sight. If they tell you to stand down, you should do so immediately.
How can PNC be used to identify a Section 178 offence?
- PNC may show no trace as it may not be fully updated yet if a recent offence and vice versa, an old “stolen” flag may still show.
- The PNC can provide you with details of the registered keeper which is advantageous to have before stopping the vehicle.
What considerations should you make when questioning a driver and/or passenger?
- Once you have stopped a vehicle you should attempt to identify the driver and any passengers present.
- You should ask to see any documentation the driver may have in relation to the vehicle and their identity. Road Traffic law empowers you to do this.
- NOTE: if any of the people in the vehicle are suspected of a Section 178 offence, your scope to question them is limited prior to them having the opportunity to consult with a solicitor. Replies to extensive questions are likely to be deemed inadmissible.
- If any incriminating remarks are made in response to questions asked outwith a police station, then these questions should be repeated in a police station interview after access to a solicitor has been offered.
- It is advantageous to separate the driver and any passengers so that the details provided can be independently verified.
What might driver and passenger behaviour show?
- A reluctance to answer questions, undue nervousness or an inability to explain their driving actions may give you cause for further suspicion.
- However, this could be cause by many factors e.g. drink or drugs, guilt of other unrelated criminal conduct or being the first time they’ve been stopped by the police.
Why is an examination of the vehicle useful?
- A check of the vehicle should be made as this may reveal a number of factors which would assist the enquiry.
- Have any windows been broken?
- Have the door locks been forced?
- Has the ignition been hot wired?
- Any of the above would be good indicators that the vehicle has been taken without consent.
What should you do if you come across an abandoned vehicle?
- Check to see if the engine is still warm. If so, consider Dog Handlers to help locate recent occupant.
- Ask locals to see if they have any knowledge of the vehicle.
- If the enquiry confirms the vehicle was taken unlawfully, then the vehicle should be preserved for forensic examination.
- It could possibly have been used in commission of other crimes.
Civic Government (Scotland) Act 1982 are intended to assist the police in PREVENTING crimes of dishonesty. What allows the Police to take action on Persons Found on Premises?
Section 57(1) Civic Government (Scotland) Act 1982 creates an offence for:-
- Any person to be found without lawful authority,
- In or on any building or other premises (enclosed or not)
- Or within its curtilage,
- Or in a vehicle or vessel
- So that in all the circumstances it may be reasonably inferred that they intended to commit ‘theft’.
What is meant by Lawful Authority?
Includes:
- The owner/occupier
- A person acting on permission of owner/occupier
- A person to grant authority on behalf of the owner or occupier e.g. property agent
- Police acting within their lawful business