unit 4 Flashcards
food justice
- broader than food security
- encompasses the concepts of production and distribution of food to ensure food security
Food justice proponents:
- ensure food security by taking action to ensure that production and distribution of food is fair for everyone around the world
- support food systems different than the regime of corporate food giants that currently dominate the sourcing, processing and distribution in our grocery stores, including off-season fruits and vegetables in developing countries.
food democracy
the concept used to defend the rights of citizens to make informed choices about their food and have the ability to genuinely influence the production, processing and distribution of their food,
(including what is to be done with excess food and waste resulting from food production, processing and distribution)
currently only possible at local level
food sovereignty
paradigm that includes those of food justice and food democracy
defined as people’s
1) right to healthy and culturally appropriate food produced through ecologically sound and sustainable methods
2) to define their own food and agriculture systems.
example of a food sovereignty movement
La Via Campesina: an international non-profit organization that promotes individual farmers’ rights and sustainable agriculture
what is the dominant distribution paradigm
corporate power and free trade
- Few large companies dominating large sub-sectors of the food system
The dominant Industrial food system paradigm is fuelled by free trade agreements
describe the free trade paradigm
- people promoting free trade argue that we should remove all types of barriers and work towards limited state
intervention in the economy (unregulated = most efficient) - each country should produce what it is most efficient at doing, resulting in vast networks of imports and exports around the world for the benefit of all
- Government intervention is inefficient + inaccurate bc officials don’t understand issues perfectly and are subject to the interest of lobbyists and unions
- NEOLIBERAL thinking (Milton Friedman). Typical of newtonian-mechanical paradigm
downsides of the free trade paradigm
Narrow flashlight: miss harsh realities since the social and environmental costs are not factored in
Factors are seen as separate from the distribution of goods
free trade has always involved regulations in the interest of powerful economies: free trade rules were always determined by rich and powerful nations unfairly demanding relatively easy access to raw materials, food and markets in developing countries while protecting their own agricultural industries from competition (think of European Union and U.S. subsidies to agriculture).
alternative distribution models
A: Give access to local food
1. farmers markets
- direct sales from farmer to consumer via Community-supported agriculture (CSA)= ppl buy in advance a share of the harvest and receive weekly/regularly delivered directly from the farm
- specialized wholesalers
EX: spud
B. fair trade
- agricultural producers and buyers follow specific social, environmental and price standards verified by an independent auditor which grants labelling with the well-known logo = FAIRTRADE certification
- fair trade proponents argue that market regulation is needed to create equitable trading between developed and less developed nations
C. Lobby groups for changes to the dominant system
- proponents use the paradigm of food justice
- promotes food self-sufficiency (against large dependence on imports)
- more transparent food system
reduction in corporate power - radical: argue that we need to look at the food system from perspectives of race, decolonization, environmental concerns, anti-poverty activism, social justice and human rights
social benefits of Local food distribution model
- strengthen links between urban and rural communities
2. divert more of the food $ spent by consumers to producers + keeping the $$ in BC economy
what is the main cause of food insecurity in North America
low income
in Northern Canada, food prices are much higher (and often have lower incomes than ppl in the south) so there is more food insecurity
Food insecurity due to poor quality food choices
many overweight individuals in NA deficient in vitamins and minerals
women’s return to work in the late 1970s-now => no cook at home to prepare meals at end of the day so ppl. (particularly families) started relying on frozen/pre-made meals/fast food
- AS a result: cooking skills and knowledge have diminished over time
increase lifestyle pace. meals aren’t scheduled around and cooking and shopping are not high priorities = opt for convenience
what’s a negative consequence of encouraging healthy eating/cooking from scratch?
working parents, mostly women, suffer from stress because they feel responsible for cooking from scratch perfect and totally healthy meals for their family every night.
explain the influence of marketing and ‘food noise’
consumers in developed countries are exposed to continuous and intense presence of food-related messages
- drown out the science-based nutrition information
- some of the messages are scientifically invalid
influence ppl to buy their products through social media and celebrity ‘influencers’
ie: fad diets and even well-intended nutrition advice can be skewed by the media (turning relatively small studies into new eating paradigms => superfood crases for goji berries, gluten-free, raw food, etc)
some consequences of ‘food noise’
loss of our traditional markers such as food made by our parents or grandparents with local and seasonal ingredients
- leads for some to unhealthy relationships with food: orthorexia; dependence on miracle diets or pills; reliance on detox programs which lack scientific support
nutritional science information/research has been ‘re-engineered by the food industry or media
ex: warning about overconsumption of red meat=> phobia of all kinds of fats
barriers to nutritional science
- is not in the business of distributing information and does not have budgets for communication as the food industry does.
- therefore its messages have taken a long time to be adopted by the general public - even though the gov’t use NS for nutritional guidelines, the process is SLOW
- new discoveries take years to become recommendations and budgets are limited - The molecular complexity of whole foods is not well understood and neither is the science of understanding the details of how whole foods are digested. There have been mistakes in the past
- based o experiments or surveys involving hums (lousy research budgets!!! so variable based on genetic, lifestyle and gut microbiome factors)
- NO unique/best diet for everyone!