Unit 3: exogenous candidates Flashcards

1
Q

Note:

A

Here, we do not distinguish between a party and a candidate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Assumptions for this analysis?

A
Complete info.
SPPs
Continuous policy space
Large number of voters, n (n is odd)
Increasing disutility with distance from the peak (i.e preferred policy)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Condition for ‘i’ being the preferred candidate?

A

if |x-α(i)| < |x-α(j)| for all i isnt equal to j, i is the preferred candidate

x is the voter’s position
α(i) and α(j) are positions of the two candidates i and j

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How do voters vote in this model? What if they are indifferent between two options?

A

They know the positions of α(i) and α(j) and chooses the one closest to their own preference!

If indifferent, 50:50 coin toss

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How is the winner decided in this model?

A

By getting a majority of votes (coin toss if two candidates draw)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is a Downsian environment?

A

Where candidates only care about winning (not necessarily what policy is implemented)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How are candidates payoffs determined in a Downsian environment?

A

Payoffs = benefits from winning (a) x prob. of winning (pi)

V=(pi)a

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Prove that, in a Downsian 2 exogenous candidate scenario, with median voter x(m), the Unique Nash Equilibrium (UNE) is at x(m)=α(1)=α(2), and that the expected benefit from both candidates entering is a/2, where a is the benefit from winning the election. (use diagrams)

A

See notes, side 1 of page 1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

For candidates only motivated by ideology, what does their utility depend on? Give an example of how their utility function may look?

A

Only the distance between their preferred position and the implemented policy!

U(x) = -|x-x(i)| where x is implemented policy and x(i) is their preferred policy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Show that, with 2 ideology motivated candidates, if they have policy preferences on the same side of the median voter’s preferred point, that x(m) will be a NE, but not a UNE?

A

see notes, top of side 2 page 1 (see diagrams in slides?)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Show that, with 2 ideology motivated candidates, if they have policy preferences on the opposite side of the median voter’s preferred point, that x(m) will be a NE and a UNE?

A

see notes side 2 page 1 midway down

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Give an example of a utility function of a candidate who is motivated by both ideology and benefits?

A

U(x) = a-|x-x(i)|

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Show that, with 2 ideology and benefits motivated candidates, who have party policies on different sides of the MVPP, the UNE is at x(m)?

A

See notes bottom of page 1 side 2

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Show that, with 2 ideology and benefits motivated candidates, who have party policies on the same sides of the MVPP, the UNE is at x(m)?

A

see notes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Possible extensions to the exogenous candidate models?

A

a) uncertainty over median voter position
b) n is even
c) increase number of candidates
d) entry cost for candidates
e) 2 (or more) policy space dimensions introduced

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

See last 3 slides and read Palfrey (1984) paper

A

now!

17
Q

What is a Nash equilibrium

A

When no player can gain by changing their strategy if the strategies of the others remain unchanged