Unit 3: Cognitive Approach Flashcards

1
Q

Multi-store model (Peterson and Peterson)

A

Info transferred from sensory store to short-term store, then rehearsed and moved to long-term store

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Levels of processing model (Peterson and Peterson)

A

Three levels information can be processed: structural, phonological, semantic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Dual task technique (Baddeley and Hitch)

A

Participants carry out two tasks at once to prevent them from rehearsing information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Working memory model (Baddeley and Hitch)

A

Is a limited capacity store for retaining information for a short period of time while performing mental operations on the info (visuospacial sketchpad, phonological loop, episodic buffer)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Central executive (Baddeley and Hitch)

A

Monitors and coordinates the operation of the sub systems

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Visuospacial sketchpad (Baddeley and Hitch)

A

Stores visual and spacial info

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Phonological loop (Baddeley and Hitch)

A

Stores sounds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Episodic buffer (Baddeley and Hitch)

A

Messenger that communicates between long term memory and the slave systems

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Schema theory (Bransford and Johnson)

A

Mental pattern recognition devices that evaluate information based on prior experiences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Scripts (Bransford and Johnson)

A

Patterns of behavior that are learned through interaction with the environment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Dual processing model (Kahneman and Tversky)

A

Two systems used to process information: system one (quick) processing and system two (rational) processing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Heuristics (Kahneman and Tversky)

A

Cognitive biases that people use when making decisions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Representative heuristics (kahneman and tversky)

A

People judge the probability of an event based on its similarity to a stereotype

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Availability heuristics (Kahneman and Tversky)

A

People judge the likelihood of an event based on how easily an example of the event comes to mind

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Peak end rule (Kahneman and Tversky)

A

Judge experiences on how they were at their peak and how they ended

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Anchoring effect (Kahneman and Tversky)

A

People rely heavily on the first piece of information when making decisions or estimations

17
Q

Framing effect (Kahneman and Tversky)

A

Language used to frame a process influences perceptions

18
Q

Leading questions (Loftus and Palmer)

A

Questions that suggest which answer is desired

19
Q

Misinformation effect (Loftus and Palmer)

A

Person’s memory becomes distorted due to misleading information about an event

20
Q

Reconstructive memory (Loftus and Palmer)

A

We rebuild memories every time we try to remember something, leads to incorrect memories (schemas can impact)

21
Q

Forced choice question (Loftus and Palmer)

A

Fixed set of possible answers and is implied which is correct

22
Q

Flashbulb memory (Buchannen and Lovallo)

A

Vivid, intense memories of significant events that are not always accurate

23
Q

Buss

A

Aim: test if evolutionary theories explain mate preferences across cultures
Procedure: Two translated surveys asking participants to rate or rank characteristics
Results: Women valued good financial prospects more than men, men preferred younger partners, men valued physical attractiveness more than women, men from collectivist cultures valued chastity and domestic skills, women from collectivist cultures valued ambition, status, finances

24
Q

Levine et. al.

A

Aim: Investigate cultural differences in the importance of love in marriage
Procedure: Survey on students asking about their attitude on importance of love for marriage, participants from eleven countries
Results: Strong differences in the percieved importance of love between countries. Countries with more importance had higher divorce rates, mostly western/individualistic cultures

25
Fisher et. al.
Aim: Investigate a link between dopaminergic brain regions and early stages of romantic love Procedure: Participants placed in an fMRI scanner and shown a picture of their romantic partner, then given a distraction task and a photo of someone they don’t have a connection with Results: fMRI showed that dopaminergic regions of the brain were the most active when viewing photo of their partner, areas associated with motivation and reward
26
Gottman and Levenson
Aim: Determine how communication affects marital satisfaction and likelihood of divorce Procedure: Interviews and observations recorded to analyze facial expressions, couples discussed one neutral, one pleasant, and one unpleasant topics, video analyzed by coding, follow-up to determine who stayed together Results: Two groups identified: regulated and unregulated. Regulated had more positive interactions and non-regulated were more likely to divorce. Participants who showed the four horsemen characteristics were more likely to divorce
27
Fincham et. al.
Aim: Measure correlations between attributions and marital satisfaction Procedure: 130 mostly white couples given questionnaires and test determining marital satisfaction, also attributions were analyzed Results: Marital satisfaction had a negative correlation with causual attributions at the beginning of the study, persisted after 18 months (negative attributions leads to less marital satisfaction)
28
Graham and Conoley
Aim: Understand the role of attributions in relationships Procedure: mostly white couples underwent stress measurement, attribution measurement, and marital satisfaction measurement Results: Stressful events had less of an impact on marital satisfaction if the participant had positive attributions of their partners (moderation/buffering effect)