Unit 3: Approaches To Global Politics Flashcards
Why do realists believe that war is an, ‘unbanishable aspect of international politics ‘?
Realism - belief in ‘power politics’ - egoism + anarchy = power politics
Realist thesis derives from human nature - humans are egotistical, pessimistic, self-seeking, power-seeking creatures
Highest body in the international system is the state - state of anarchy
Security Dilemma - weapons are ‘inherently ambiguous symbols’
Why do liberals believe that there is harmony and balance in international politics?
International Organisations
Mutual reliance and interdependence
Democratic Peace Thesis
How significant is globalisation?
Significant -
Hyper globalists (liberals) argue that we live in the border less world and the ‘post sovereign state’ has been born
Rise in number of non-state actors. Some non-state actors are now more significant than many states. E.g. NGOs, terrorist groups, religions
Intensifies globalisation and the shifts in power from national to the transnational
Insignificant -
‘Globalisation Sceptics’ realist argument - myth that sovereignty has been abandoned
Trend towards global governance proves arena fro states to achieve their goals
Key features of the anti-globalisation movement:
Belief in localism as an antidote to globalisation - ideological conviction that localisation is infinitely preferable to globalisation
Attacking multilateral financial institutions - movements issue is to expose the errors of global trade agreements
Diverse movement of protestors - demonstrations routinely vandalised commercial outlets fronting corporations such as Nike - protests designed to show world transformed into ‘American monoculture’
Arguments globalisation is a force for good:
Surest way of reducing poverty and narrowing inequality - globalisation positive as mutual benefits flow from engaging in the global economy
China is the most spectacular example of how an NIC can make globalisation work for its benefit, but states such as India, Brazil, Mexico, Malaysia and the East Asian ‘Tigers’ have adopted similar strategies
Transnational problems require transnational solutions - global interdependence makes it imperative for states to renounce competition because they increasingly have a shared interest in cooperation and fewer incentives to fight
Globalisation is creating a strong web of constraints on the foreign policy behaviour of those who are plugged into the network of global transactions
Shared problems can only be managed through collective, multilateral cooperation - linked to the ‘democratic peace theory’
Arguments globalisation is a bad force:
Globalisation may not lead to greater transnational cooperation, but instead to cut-throat competition over resources
Globalisation empowers advantaged states but constrains the prospects of weak states - producing new inequalities as gap between wealthy and poor widens
Because benefits of globalisation will not be distributed equally, globalisation will likely generate conflict between winners and losers - temptation to seek isolation from the assault of globalisation on national autonomy by creating barriers to trade and other transactions may be irresistible
Globalisation game of winners and losers
Between-country inequalities are exacerbated by the tendencies implicit in the global trading system and particularly the principle of free trade
Advance of globalisation has been associated with growing rural poverty and widening of rural-urban disparities
Globalisation has fostered within-country inequality
Arguments globalisation has undermined state sovereignty:
States are subject to the intergovernmental organisations that police the rules of regional and global trade
Globalisation has also made private firms and traders very powerful in relation to states
Globalised communications system weakens the states ability to keep out material it considers undesirable
Other developments, which weaken the power of states to protect their citizens, can be linked to globalisation
Arguments globalisation has not undermined state sovereignty:
States still retain considerable power, which they seek to protect - sovereignty therefore remains an important concept
Whole operation of the global economy depends on agreements which states have entered into voluntarily
States retain much of their sovereign power
States seek to contain some of the globalising forces, for example by seeking to restrict access to sources of information they consider to be undesirable
Globalisation is the same thing as ‘Americanisation’ as:
Globalisation is homogenisation and creating a world in America’s image
Globalisation amounts to American Cultural Imperialism
Globalisation means Global liberalisation and the dominance of the USA in global financial organisations
Globalisation is not the same thing as ‘Americanisation’
It works both ways and globalisation is hybridisation
Globalisation has actually resulted in the rebirth of the local
Globalisation has actually resulted in polarisation not homogenisation (and in some cases this equates to an anti-Americanism)
Key features of the anti-globalisation movement:
A belief in localism as an antidote to globalisation
Attacking multilateral financial institutions
A diverse movement of protestors
Arguments globalisation is significant:
Hyper globalists (liberals) argue that we live in the border less world and the ‘post sovereign state’ has been born
Rise in number of non-state actors. Some non-state actors are now more significant than many states. E.g. NGOs, terrorist groups, religions
Intensifies globalisation and the shifts in power from national to the transnational
Arguments globalisation is not significant:
‘Globalisation Sceptics’ realist argument - myth that sovereignty has been abandoned
Trend towards global governance proves arena fro states to achieve their goals
Define a nation-state:
Political community bound together by the bonds of citizenship and nationality, meaning political + cultural identity coincide
What is a ‘failed state’ and give an example?
Failed State is a state where there is no government + lacks internal sovereignty
For example, Congo
Two criteria for a state to be sovereign:
Internal Sovereignty
External Sovereignty
Define Globalisation:
Growing interconnectedness of the world
Define ‘Cultural Imperialism’:
Spread of one culture across the world