Unit 3 Flashcards
chapter 3
what was the purpose of the milgram experiment?
study obedience to an authority figure
how did stanley milgram study obedience to an authority figure?
had a confederate (A confederate is anyone who supports you and works toward the same goal with you) be in the experiment and a volunteer, they had to draw slips of paper to determine who would be the teacher and who would be the learner. if the learner got something wrong on the test the teacher had to shock them with a higher voltage each time
what was unethical about milgrams experiement?
picking the slips was rigged and the volunteer was always the teacher, this could cause psychological stress to the volunteer as he was encouraged to continue hurting a person
what did the results of milgrams experiment show us?
that we can resist authority
two types of deception (misrepresenting info to participants) in milgram’s experiments
misleading participants about a studys goals (participants agreed to take part in a study on memory and learning)
staging a situation (volunteers were unknowing participants in a staged play)
why do researchers use decption?
because they think if they tell the participants whats actually going on, they will not agree to take place in it
alternatives to deception
role playing
simulation studies
honest experiments
what is role playing?
ask participants to role play
ex. imagine what you would do in this situation
ex. predict how real participants in a situation would behave
(issue with this is people might lie, or figure out what the researcher wants them to say. a real situation would be better)
what is a simulation study?
used to examine conflict between individuals in a competition, driving behaviour using driving simulators or jury deliberations
normally dont raise ethical issues
how is the stanford prison study an example of a simulation study?
students were paid to act as guards or prisoners in a simulated prison (experiement stopped early because the people of higher power (guards) started to take their role too seriously)
(the only simulation study that raised ethical issues
what is an honest experiment?
research design that does not try to misinform or hide information from participants
ex. speed dating
who developed a code of medical and research ethics?
nuremberg war tribunal
why did they come up with the code of medical and research ethics?
after german doctors conducted horrific experiments on their prisoners (no informed consent)
why is informed consent of participants often a problem for researchers?
knowledge of the hypothesis may bias the participants’ behavior.
what are the recommendations to follow ethics according to nuremberg war tribunal?
participants should consent to participate in research
participants should be fully informed about the research’s purpose
risks should be avoided when possible
participants should be shielded against possible risks to the fullest extent
only scientifically qualified persons should conduct research
participants have the right to withdrawal from any research design at any time
what are the two bodies that provide guidelines for ethical human research?
Tri-Council Policy Statement
the Canadian Psychological Association code of ethics
the tri- council refers to the three federally funded research grant agencies, what are they?
canadian institutes of health research (CIHR)
social sciences and humanities research council of canada (SSHRC)
natural sciences and engineering research council of canada (NSERC)
what is REB?
research ethics board (if you have funding from tri- council you must use a REB that reviews the study before starting any research on humans)
what is exempt research?
research that does not require REB review when it:
only uses publicly available information that is legally accessible
only involves observing people in public places without any intervention or interaction by the researcher and no individuals can be identified when presenting the results
uses data that have already been collected and are completely anonymous
what is minimal risk research?
risks of harm to participants are no greater than the risks on would normally encounter in daily life. approval of REB can be delegated to a single member rather than considered by the whole committee
what is greater than minimal risk research?
subject to thorough review by the full REB committee
if trying to decide if the research is minimal risk or greater than minimal risk it will just be categorized as greater than minimal risk
what are the 3 basic ethical principles that express the value of ensuring human dignity and are specified in the tri council policy statement (TCPS2)?
respect for persons
concern for welfare
justice
how must researchers show respect for persons?
respect the autonomy (let people choose participation freely)
protect those who have developing, impaired autonomy
participants should be treated as autonomous and capable of making deliberate decisions to participate in research (informed consent)
what is included in TCPS2 consent form? 7
-purpose of research
-procedures used (including time involved)
-risks and benefits to the participant and society
-any compensation
-how confidentiality will be protected
-assurance of voluntary participation
-permission to withdraw without penalty
-contact information if there are further questions
what is assent?
when minors are asked to participate a parent or guardian must sign off for them and the minor must also sign (the minor signing is assent) this occurs with informed consent in TCPS2
what is secondary use of data?
data that is being created and stored (by governments, businesses and researchers) as a result of our increased reliance on technology
how must researchers show concern for welfare?
attempt to minimize risks associated with participating in research while maximizing the benefits of that research to individual participants and to society (participants can choose if the benefits outweigh the risks)
how must researchers show justice?
treat people fairly
recruitment methods that offer participation to people from a diverse range of social groups
must be a scientific rationale to using age, gender or criteria to select participants (unethical to study a particular group of people to advance science if that group will not benefit from that research)
the Tuskegee Syphilis Study represents a high risk study that was conduced on individuals because they were powerless and marginalized within society (justice issue) explain what occurred in this study
399 african americans were not given medical treatment in order to track the long term effects of this disease
how does the TCPS2 deal with research involving indigenous people?
the research must engage and benefit the involved communities
what is a risk/ benefit analysis?
calculate potential risks and benefits that are likely to result
what do risks include in the risk/ benefit analysis?
physical harm
psychological stress (also contributes to concern for welfare)
losing privacy and confidentiality (important when studying sensitive topics such as SA, divorce, drug abuse. try to keep people anonymous)
how can researchers keep participants anonymous?
dont need specific information about their personal life
dont connect peoples identity with particular data (give them a code, so if the info does get out, the hacker wouldnt know whose is whose)
what is debriefing?
occurs after the completion of the study where researcher may deal with issues of deception, withholding information and potential harmful effects of participation
what are the two largest associations that promote the science of psychology through the nuremberg recommendations?
the american association (APA)
the american psychological society (APS)