Unit 3 Flashcards
Civil liberties
fundamental rights and freedoms protected from infringement by the gov
Civil Rights
protections from discrimination as a member of a particular group
Snowden’s role as traitor
violated espionage act of 1917
Snowden’s role as hero
publicized gov’s collection of citizen’s priv convos/ electronic communications, spying of citizens
stole million+classified files from gov database and leaked it to newspapers
Which issue was raised by Snowden’s acts?
questions abt privacy and power of gov over American rights
Bill of Rights
list of fundamental rights and freedoms that indiv’s possess
first 10 amendments to the Constitution
Why was there a debate in 1787 over the necessity of a BoR?
each state gov had their own version of the Constitution
Which group of people insisted on the BoR?
Antifeds
Why did the ____ want the BoR?
thought it was a nec protection against growth of central power
Why did Hamilton say it wasn’t nec?
1- gov designed to protect indiv rights
2- dangerous to liberty b/c no list would be complete, leaving room for abuse
When was the BoR formally ratified?
1791
BoR-1
prevents leg branch from passing laws restricting a variety of indiv rights (rel, speech, press, assembly, right to petition)
BoR-2/3
involve firearms, quartering soldiers, formation of militaries
BoR-4,5,6,7,8
guarantee rights of Americans w/ the judicial system- accused, tried for, and convicted of crimes
BoR-9
citizens have rights beyond the BoR
BoR- 10
states reserved powers
Application of BoR
initially only for fed gov, not states
applied to states selectively and over time
1919 Gitlow vs NY
G charged for distributing weekly newspapers criticizing America during WWI
argued it violated his 14th amendment right
sided with NY
Take away from Gitlow v NY
the beginning of selective incorporation
14th Amendment (1868)
lays foundation for extending the protections of the BoR to the state laws and actions
Due Process Clause
(14th Amendment)
no STATE can deny a person “life, lib, or prop w/o due process of law”
Selective Incorporation
piecemeal process by which SCOTUS has affirmed that almost all of the protections w/i the BoR also apply to the state govs
Establishment Clause
protection against the gov requ citizens to join or support a religion
Free Exercise Clause
protection of the rights of individuals to exercise and express their religious beliefs
Board of Edu v Allen (1968)
SCOTUS affirmed the principle that there could be permissible forms of taxpayer support for private religious schools
Engel v Vitale (1962)
SCOTUS ruled that school- sponsored prayer violated est clause
Abington School District v Schempp (1963)
Court struck down a program that involved the reading of 10 verses and recitation of the Lord’s Prayer at the beginning of the day
“Lemon Test”
sets guidelines for what is permissible under the est clause
Lemon v Kurtzman (1971)
programs supp salaries of teachers & provided edu materials in religiously based priv schools for purpose of teaching non religious subjects
SCOTUS took down both programs
Why did Scotus strike down the programs of Lemon v Kurtzman (1971)
- $$ must be secular in purpose
- effects must neither adv or inhibit rel
- most not foster exc entanglement btwn gov & rel
Wisconsin v Yoder
Amish challenged Wisconsin law that requ students to go to school until 16 b/c it violated right to free exercise b/c they believed that making their children attend hs went against their religion & way of life
SCOTUS ruled w/ Yoder
Freedom of expression
a fundamental right affirmed in the First Amendment to speak, publish, and protest
How are the needs of national security and the fundamental rights of political expression balanced?
- political expression often suppressed during wartimes
- Espionage Act of 1917
Schneck v United States (1919)
- printed/ distributed antiwar leaflets against the military draft
- violation of Espionage Act
- “clear and present danger” test
“clear and present danger” test
legal standard that says posing an immediate and serious threat to national security is not protected by the 1st Amendment
Prior Restraint
the suppression of material prior to publication on the grounds that it might endanger national security
NY Times v US (1971)
Nixon tried to prevent the NY Times and Washington Post from publishing classified materials, ruled with NY Times- free press is nec to democracy
(press serves governed, not governors)
Tinker v Des Moines (1969)
students wanted to wear black armbands to protest the Vietnam War, but admin made a policy for them to be removed and the students were suspended for not removing them
SCOTUS ruled with the students- they don’t lose rights at the school gate
Libel
an untrue statement that injures a person’s reputation
Slander
an untrue spoken expression that injures a person’s reputation
NY Times v Sullivan (1964)
Montgomery, Alabama official won $500,000 lawsuit vs NY Times in which an article claimed officials used excessive force against student protests
SCOTUS had overturned lower court ruling because the ad was not placed with ‘actual malice’
Roth v US (1957)
defined standard for obscenity
“whether the average person, applying contemporary community standard, the dominant theme of the material, taken as a whole, appeals to prurient interest.”
Miller v California (1973)
miller test- criteria to be obscene
- “patently offensive”
- “utterly without redeeming social value”
- “contemporary community standard”
Why was the Communications Decency Act struck down?
- Restrictions too vague and restrictive
- “chilling effect on free speech”
DeJonge v Oregon (1937)
the court overturned Oregon law under which a member of the Communist Party was convicted & sentenced to 7 yrs in prison for holding a public meeting
SCOTUS ruled in favour of DeJonge
District of Columbia v Heller (2008)
court overturned the ban in DC on handgun ownership for purpose of self defense in a home
McDonald v Chicago (2010)
court overturned Chicago ban on handgun ownership
2nd Amendment right is not less important than the other amendments
Highly charged topic
not defined by the court until recently
2nd amendment