Unit 2 Flashcards
Leading Strand
Continuous synthesis continues in a 5 to 3
direction
Lagging Strand
Discontinuous synthesis produces 5’ to 3’ DNA segments
Lagging Strand Segments
Okazaki Fragments
Significance of Primer
To tell the polymerase where to bind on the old strand of DNA to build the new strand
DNA Polymerase Read VS Build
3’ to 5’ VS 5’ to 3’
PCR Technology Was Developed By
Mullis who won the Nobel Prize in 1993 for it
Steps of PCR
Denaturing, annealing, extending
Denaturing
Breakdown of DNA
Separate the DNA into single strands by heating it to 94-98 degrees Celsius for one to two minutes, and the heat breaks the hydrogen bonds
Annealing
Lower the temperature back down to 50-65 degrees Celsius in order to get the primers to anneal, or base pair, to their complementary sequences
Extending
Raise the temperature back up to 72 degrees Celsius which allows the DNA polymerase (which works to copy the DNA) to attach at the primer site and copy the target section of DNA
Primer Dimers Tell You That
PCR worked
In Vitro
Outside the body
In Vivo
Inside the body
DNA Replication Comparison
Two copies, uses helicase, in vivo, uses helicase, primase, and ligase, has okazaki fragments
PCR Comparison
Millions of copies, uses heat, in vitro, consistent, doesn’t use main enzymes
DNA Replication and PCR Same
Make copies of DNA, use polymerase
Most Common Type of Sequencing
Sequencing by Synthesis (SBS)
Next Generation Sequencing
Faster, easier, cheaper, and more accurate
DNA Barcoding in Animals
Looks at COI gene (cytochrome oxidase)
658 bp mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA)
Field of Bioinformatics
Application of tools of computation and analysis to the capture and interpretation of biological data
International Barcode of Life Project
Mega project aimed at identifying and categorizing all life on Earth
Illuminate biodiversity to save our living planet
IBoLP Relate to Estimated Number of Identified Species Compared to Yearly Extinction Rate
As species diversity increases, the likelihood of extinction decreases
Scientists believe that species are going extinct at a faster rate than we can identify them with classic taxonomy
Classic Taxonomy VS DNA Barcoding
Convergent evolution makes identification difficult
Same species can look very different
Different species can look similar
Classifying organisms requires advanced training
Time consuming, slow process
Species are going extinct faster rate than can be identified
Huge number of species
Threats to outpace the rate of species discovery
Some situations it is impossible to identify using classic taxonomy
DNA barcoding uses little DNA to identify and compare an organism
DNA Barcoding Contraversy
Concerns of accuracy
Scientists disagree that regions sequenced are not best for species identification
DNA barcoding minimizes the value of taxonomic identification