Unit 10 Flashcards
Reasons for change
External-pestle
Internal-performance-good=expand, poor=retrench
leadership-may change organisational culture or structure
Disruptive change+example
Forces firms to suddenly do things a different way, characterised by a shift in the underlying forces of an industry. e.g internet
Lewin’s force field analysis cons (3)
Identifies and evaluates driving/restraining forces of change. Ranks in importance.
- requires full participation to provide accurate info to be realistic
- may not cause a consensus. May cause a divide between people who oppose/support
- effectiveness depends on skill level of group who are doing it, there may be gaps in information etc
Drawbacks of change (4)
Cost
Time
Loss of focus-managers lose focus on core activities
Resistance (K&S)
Kotter & Schlesinger reasons for resistance (4)
Different assessments-understand reasons but disagree/have a better plan
Fear+misunderstanding-do not trust motives
Prefer things as they are-don’t like change
Self interest-worse off if change occurred..?
Kotter & Schlesinger overcoming resistance (6)
- Education+communication
- Participation+involvement
- Facilitation+support
- Negotiation+agreement
- Manipulation+co-optation
- Explicit/Implicit coercion
Manipulation+co-optation
Giving desirable role in change. For appearance, rather than contribution. Cheap and quick if other strategies are unsuitable/fail, but Unethical, can lose trust if seen as manipulator.
Explicit/Implicit coercion
Forcing employees-by risk of job loss, transfer or derived promotion. Fast but hurts trust etc. Risky as people resent being forced
Hofstede’s national culture (6 dimensions)
Power distance Individualism v Collectivism Masculinity v Femininity Uncertainty Avoidance Long term Orientation Indulgence v Restraint
Handy’s Organisational Culture (4)
Role-clearly delegated authority
Task-teams formed to solve tasks
People-people are superior
Power-centralised, fast d-m
Power culture pros cons (1,2)
+Centralised (quicker, expertise, overview)
- Struggle when growing to keep decisions making central (react slowly compared to comp)
- Employees resistant, don’t have a say
Good in Greiners creativity phase
Role culture pros cons (1,3)
+Clearly delegated roles of authority.
- Employees not involved and not used to doing things differently so resist
- Slow communication as more levels
- Silo mentality-don’t help other departments
Good in stable environment, or a country with high UAI
Person culture pros cons (1,1)
Objectives defined by personal ambitions.
+joint decisions, so employees are likely to be comfortable (no resist)
-decision making be hard to make due to self interest.
Task culture (2,3)
Focus on tasks in teams.
+respond well to objectives
+change is normal, as teams change (less resistance)
-conflict between teams for resource/budget
-confusing if too many products/projects
-training costs
Good for strategic drift as flexible.
Value of change (5)
Maintain CA Adapt to external environment Grow and compete more effectively Improve efficiency and productivity Improve HR relations
Flexible organisations
Respond quickly to external changes. Workplace is flexible
Knowledge and information management (KIM) and benefit and example
Organising, storing, sharing info so everyone can benefit from its use.
Allows more flexibility as info more accessible, easily respond to change or make decisions
Staff share lessons learnt to avoid same problems in future
Ways to be more flexible (7)
Part time Job sharing Flexitime Compressed hours Annual hours Telecommuting Zero hour contracts
Strategic drift
Strategy becomes less suited to environment making it no longer fit for purpose
Difficulties when strategic decision making (internal and external)
Pestle
Unforeseen circumstances
Competitors actions
Poor leadership
Poor allocation of resources
Resistance
Planned strategy vs Emergent strategy +example
Emergent strategy develops overtime
e.g viagra was intended to be for medical use
Pros cons of planned strategy (2,3)
Clear sense of direction Easily communicated Lacks flexibility Costly+Long Can be too detailed/unreasonable
Pros cons of emergent strategy (3,4)
+quick, cheap
+flexible, can respond to changes, use hunch, more creative and innovative (Avoid strategic drift)
+based on decisions of junior management, more up to date
- can cause mistrust due to changes
- unclear end goal (not motivating)
- can be hard for large companies as needs coordination (better for flat structures)
- ill prepared in terms of resources/time
Education + communication (K&S)
+shows need for change
- requires good relationship
- time and effort (short run?)
Participation and involvement (2,2)
+good when initiators don’t have all info
+reduces resistance
-can lead to poor solution if not managed well.
-time consuming
Facilitation & support
Expensive time consuming
Negotiation & agreement
+simple
-expensive e.g wage rises
critical path analysis
Identify the most efficient way of completing a project
Why CPA is needed
Projects are complex, high risk and sig investment or have narrow deadlines needed to be met