Unit 1- development and underdevelopment theories Flashcards
Modernization theory
- first and most widely accepted theory
- Central question: Does the development of the less developed world follow the same historical trajectory as the West?
- Intellectual origins: sociologist Max Weber (German sociologist, philosopher, jurist, and political economist)
- Max Weber viewed economic development and social change as a function of people’s ideas, culture, and beliefs, rather than social relations and historical context.
- he did not believe capitalism was inevitable everywhere
- his ideas were very popular in the US following WW2
Modernization theory- Talcott Parsons version
The American version–> modern = western
- denying the possibility of modern, non-western cultures
- Parsonian modernization theory explicitly advocated capitalism as the best path any country can chose as it was written the Cold War
- capitalism is the only way to modernity, wealth and democracy
- If LDCs adopt Western values, market relations and government institutions they’ll become developed societies –> the path from traditional to modern is unidirectional
- Rich industrial countries = modern –> poor countries must undergo the modernization process to acquire these traits
- the LDCs will eventually achieve the same prosperity when they give up the traditions that keep them trapped in an irrational past
Important aspects of the modernization theory
- advocated stability and gradual change, not revolutionary leaps
- capitalism is inevitable worldwide (Weber meant it was a unique situation in Europe)
- economic development occurred through a series of stages –> the labor force is employed first in agriculture, then manufacturing and then services
- advocates free trade
- poverty is the result of the incomplete formation and diffusion of the markets
- the rural areas must catch up with the cities like the LDC must catch up with the developed world
- population growth must be controlled
- growing middle class to protect civil liberties
Modernization theory- Walter Rostow
- Walter Rostow (1916-2003), american economist and policy advisor in the
1960s, proposed a famous five-stage model of development. - His model likened economic growth to an airplane taking off.
Rostow´s five stages
1) Traditional society
2) Preconditions for take-off
3) The take-off
4) The drive to maturity
5) The age of mass consumption
Stage 1- traditional society
-Has no started the process of development -High % of people in primary sectors
-High % of wealth in non productive activities such as the military and religion
Stage 2- preconditions for take-off
-Under international trade: an elite group (well- educated leaders) initiates innovatives economic activities: exploitation of agriculture and extractive industry.
-Investment in new technology and infrastructure (water supply, transportation systems…) –> increase in productivity
Stage 3- the take-off
-Development of manufacturing sector: few industries achieve technical advances
- Rapid growth is generated in a limited number of economic activities, such as textiles or food production
-Other sectors remaning in traditional practices
Stage 4- the drive to maturity
-Development of wider industrial and commercial base
- Modern technology diffuses to a wide variety of industries, more skilled labor force
Stage 5- The age of mass consumption
-Shift from production of heavy industry (steel, energy) to consumer goods (cars,tvs,computers)
Policy implications of the modernization theory
- Advocates the formation of unrestricted markets, thus barriers to trade and investment should be removed.
- Foreign capital in the form of multinational corporations should be welcome.
- Urban development should be promoted at the expenses of rural areas.
- More recently: used to justify neoliberal structural adjustment policies of the IMF, including currency devaluations and reduction in government subsidies
Critics on the modernization theory
- Ethnocentric: history of the West an ideal to be imitated, everyone else’s culture is inferior.
- Simplistic and unidimensional view of history only in the experience of the West
- LDCs: backwards versions of the West, not unique entities with their own cultures and histories
- Not considering the impact of hundreds of year of colonialism
- Uncritically celebrates markets as a mechanism producing only wealth, not poverty- it ignores the costs of capital development
- Focuses only on the internal dynamics within countries and ignores the external context - ends up blaming the victims
The dependency theory
- Scholars from the developing world – Latin America- started questioning the modernization theory
- Competitive advantage and interdependence to Western scholars = exploitation to many in the LDCs
- Development of the core countries is intrinsically dependent on the underdevelopment of the periphery countries
- Unequal development of the world economy stems directly from the historical experience of colonialism
- The development of Europe and North America depended on the systematic exploitation of underdeveloped areas.
- Underdevelopment is not a state but an active process- this process is described as “development of underdevelopment”
- the LDCs were made poor by the west- uneven exchange
- LDCs produce low valued goods in the primary sector and purchase high valued goods from the core
- focuses on external, not internal, causes of poverty
- LDCs do not temporarily “lag” behind the West but are mired in poverty produced by the West
- the wealth of the developed countries is derived from the labor and resources of the LDCs
- Markets dont eradicate uneven development (modernization theory), it perpetuates it –> “the zero-sum game”, development and underdevelopment are two sides of the same coin –> development somewhere requires underdevelopment somewhere else
- independent development is impossible
- Core vs periphery concepts.
Policy implications of the dependency theory
- Self-reliance: countries should exclude transnational corporations
- Countries should implement import substitution to promote domestic production
- Some people advocate defaulting on foreign debt
Critics to the dependency theory
- It tends to view the global periphery as passive and incapable of taking actions.
- All LDCs victims of capitalism to the same degree.
- It ignores internal causes of poverty (ie. Rural aristocracies)
- Simplistic: does not offer adequate account of technological change and productivity growth.
- Example: East Asian NICs showed that development on the global periphery is indeed possible and capitalism does not automatically antically reduce all LDCs to impoverished states