Unit 1- development and underdevelopment theories Flashcards
Modernization theory
- first and most widely accepted theory
- Central question: Does the development of the less developed world follow the same historical trajectory as the West?
- Intellectual origins: sociologist Max Weber (German sociologist, philosopher, jurist, and political economist)
- Max Weber viewed economic development and social change as a function of people’s ideas, culture, and beliefs, rather than social relations and historical context.
- he did not believe capitalism was inevitable everywhere
- his ideas were very popular in the US following WW2
Modernization theory- Talcott Parsons version
The American version–> modern = western
- denying the possibility of modern, non-western cultures
- Parsonian modernization theory explicitly advocated capitalism as the best path any country can chose as it was written the Cold War
- capitalism is the only way to modernity, wealth and democracy
- If LDCs adopt Western values, market relations and government institutions they’ll become developed societies –> the path from traditional to modern is unidirectional
- Rich industrial countries = modern –> poor countries must undergo the modernization process to acquire these traits
- the LDCs will eventually achieve the same prosperity when they give up the traditions that keep them trapped in an irrational past
Important aspects of the modernization theory
- advocated stability and gradual change, not revolutionary leaps
- capitalism is inevitable worldwide (Weber meant it was a unique situation in Europe)
- economic development occurred through a series of stages –> the labor force is employed first in agriculture, then manufacturing and then services
- advocates free trade
- poverty is the result of the incomplete formation and diffusion of the markets
- the rural areas must catch up with the cities like the LDC must catch up with the developed world
- population growth must be controlled
- growing middle class to protect civil liberties
Modernization theory- Walter Rostow
- Walter Rostow (1916-2003), american economist and policy advisor in the
1960s, proposed a famous five-stage model of development. - His model likened economic growth to an airplane taking off.
Rostow´s five stages
1) Traditional society
2) Preconditions for take-off
3) The take-off
4) The drive to maturity
5) The age of mass consumption
Stage 1- traditional society
-Has no started the process of development -High % of people in primary sectors
-High % of wealth in non productive activities such as the military and religion
Stage 2- preconditions for take-off
-Under international trade: an elite group (well- educated leaders) initiates innovatives economic activities: exploitation of agriculture and extractive industry.
-Investment in new technology and infrastructure (water supply, transportation systems…) –> increase in productivity
Stage 3- the take-off
-Development of manufacturing sector: few industries achieve technical advances
- Rapid growth is generated in a limited number of economic activities, such as textiles or food production
-Other sectors remaning in traditional practices
Stage 4- the drive to maturity
-Development of wider industrial and commercial base
- Modern technology diffuses to a wide variety of industries, more skilled labor force
Stage 5- The age of mass consumption
-Shift from production of heavy industry (steel, energy) to consumer goods (cars,tvs,computers)
Policy implications of the modernization theory
- Advocates the formation of unrestricted markets, thus barriers to trade and investment should be removed.
- Foreign capital in the form of multinational corporations should be welcome.
- Urban development should be promoted at the expenses of rural areas.
- More recently: used to justify neoliberal structural adjustment policies of the IMF, including currency devaluations and reduction in government subsidies
Critics on the modernization theory
- Ethnocentric: history of the West an ideal to be imitated, everyone else’s culture is inferior.
- Simplistic and unidimensional view of history only in the experience of the West
- LDCs: backwards versions of the West, not unique entities with their own cultures and histories
- Not considering the impact of hundreds of year of colonialism
- Uncritically celebrates markets as a mechanism producing only wealth, not poverty- it ignores the costs of capital development
- Focuses only on the internal dynamics within countries and ignores the external context - ends up blaming the victims
The dependency theory
- Scholars from the developing world – Latin America- started questioning the modernization theory
- Competitive advantage and interdependence to Western scholars = exploitation to many in the LDCs
- Development of the core countries is intrinsically dependent on the underdevelopment of the periphery countries
- Unequal development of the world economy stems directly from the historical experience of colonialism
- The development of Europe and North America depended on the systematic exploitation of underdeveloped areas.
- Underdevelopment is not a state but an active process- this process is described as “development of underdevelopment”
- the LDCs were made poor by the west- uneven exchange
- LDCs produce low valued goods in the primary sector and purchase high valued goods from the core
- focuses on external, not internal, causes of poverty
- LDCs do not temporarily “lag” behind the West but are mired in poverty produced by the West
- the wealth of the developed countries is derived from the labor and resources of the LDCs
- Markets dont eradicate uneven development (modernization theory), it perpetuates it –> “the zero-sum game”, development and underdevelopment are two sides of the same coin –> development somewhere requires underdevelopment somewhere else
- independent development is impossible
- Core vs periphery concepts.
Policy implications of the dependency theory
- Self-reliance: countries should exclude transnational corporations
- Countries should implement import substitution to promote domestic production
- Some people advocate defaulting on foreign debt
Critics to the dependency theory
- It tends to view the global periphery as passive and incapable of taking actions.
- All LDCs victims of capitalism to the same degree.
- It ignores internal causes of poverty (ie. Rural aristocracies)
- Simplistic: does not offer adequate account of technological change and productivity growth.
- Example: East Asian NICs showed that development on the global periphery is indeed possible and capitalism does not automatically antically reduce all LDCs to impoverished states
The World-Systems Theory
- Allows for some mobility within the capitalist world economy compared to the dependency theory
- Started by sociologist Inmanuel Wallerstein (NY, USA, 1930-2019)
- The forces driving the world economy are in permanent spatial disequilibrium.
- Focus on the entire world rather than the individual nation-states
- can’t study the internal dynamics of countries without also examining the external ones –> the boundary between foreign and domestic disappears
- Pre-capitalist world empires ≠ capitalist world system.
- Under global capitalism there is a single market but multiple political centers
→ No effective control over the market → nation state vs. interstate system. - Maintains that capitalism takes many forms and uses labor in different ways in different regions: It is the search for profits through low-cost labor that drives the world system forward to expand into unexplored territories.
- The core, the periphery and the semi-periphery
- The semi-periphery has characteristics of both- includes states at the upper tier of the LDCs such as NICs, Brazil, Mexico and Saudi Arabia
The semi-periphery countries
Exploited by the core countries with regard to raw materials and product flow while at the same time exploiting periphery countries
World system theory- the hegemony
- Assumes a world hegemonic power: the hegemon “sets the rule of the game” → dominates the global political and economic system.
- Hegemony exists when one core power enjoys supremacy in production, commerce, and finance and have a position of political leadership → hegemonic situations: periods of peace.
- The hegemonic power owns and control the largest share of the world ́s production apparatus → relies on economic mechanisms to extract the surplus value of the periphery.
- because of political and military superiority the dominant core country maintains order in the world system and imposes solutions to internal conflicts that serve its self-interests
- when powers in the core has conflicts among themselves they open opportunities both for new hegemony and for countries on the periphery
- Competing core countries rely on the mechanism of colonialism to extract the surplus of the periphery.
- During a power ́s fall from hegemony, rival core states, which can focus on capital accumulation without the burden of maintaining the political and military apparatus of supremacy, catch up and challenge the hegemonic power.
- periodic fluctuation from a single, hegemonic power to a group of competing countries are essential to the survival of the world system
Regional inequalities within developing countries are..
reflections of social inequalities because economic landscapes are produced by social relations
What has an absolute negative effect on the growth rate and development of the periphery?
- capital movements
- trade flows
- internal migration
- institutional controls
The center-periphery concept
The center appropriates to itself the surplus of the periphery for its own development
At a world level: The global center (rich industrialized countries) drains the global periphery (underdeveloped countries)
Three methods for developed countries to help LDCs:
1) Expand trade with LDCs
2) Invest private capital in the LDCs
3) Provide foreign aid to the LDCs
1) Expand trade with LDCs
- reducing tariffs and barriers will improve the situation somewhat- like Mexico with NAFTA
- However increasing trade means the LDCs must produce something to export
- also, the LDCs are often tied economically to the developed nation they have a trade relation with
Invest private capital in the LDCs
- since the debt crisis in 1980s and 90s the investment and private capital flows have decreased
- often they have to pledge a financial return + guarantee that a politically stable environment will prevail
- an international trade climate must also be provided- financial and marketing systems, favorable tax rate, maintenance of infrastructure and some measurement of reliable labor flow