Unit 1: Ch. 2 Flashcards
Research Utilization (RU)
Use of study findings in a practical application that’s unrelated to the original research. Small department in the hospital does just this
1980s
Utilization Review (UR)
Small department in the hospital that focuses on just research.
1980s
Evidence-Based Practice (EBP)
Use of the best evidence to make pt care decisions. Relies heavily on research, nursing experience, and pt preferences. 1990s gradually switching to this after several years
Broader than RU b/c it integrates research findings w/ other factors
Starts w/ a clinical question (what does the evidence say is the best approach to solving this problem?)
Archie Cochrane
Did systematic reviews on a large scale. Used standardized instruments that they used to collect data
British epidemiologist in 1970s
Called for efforts to make research summaries about interventions available to health care providers –> Cochrane Collaboration
What’s the aim of the Cochrane Collaboration?
Help providers make good health care decisions by preparing and disseminating systematic reviews of health care interventions
David Sackett, McMaster Medical School, and Evidence-Based medicine
McMaster Medical school in Canada developed clinical learning strategy called Evidence-Based Medicine (occurred about the same time as Cochrane Collaboration began)
Evidence based medicine pioneered by Dr. David Sackett, has broadened to the use of best evidence by ALL health care practitioners. W/ EBP skillful clinicians can no longer rely on a repository of memorized info but rather must be adept in accessing, evaluating, and using new research evidence
Teaching from evidence-based medicine perspective changed everything - nursing didn’t make the switch as quickly
Harris Cooper
Worked at MU, wrote books about step-by-step ways to do systematic reviews, where nursing started to participate in systematic reviews
Evidence Hierarchies
Involve ranking evidence sources according to the strength of evidence they provide
Ranking may depend on the type of question being asked
Within each level, evidence quality may vary considerably
Different ways of ranking articles on their quality. In order to do a systematic review there has to be a lot of research done. If it’s a newer topic you may not be able to go high up the pyramid b/c there isn’t enough evidence to do so. You can go higher up as evidence is found.
Systematic review is the #__ form of research for EBP
1
This is because the strongest evidence comes from careful syntheses of multiple studies
Level 2 evidence depends on?
The nature of inquiry
What is under level 2 for the evidence hierarchy?
Single randomized controlled trial (RCT)
-theory and some etiology questions
Single non-randomized trial (quasi-experiment)
Single prospective/cohort study
-prognosis and some diagnosis questions
Single case-control study
Single cross-sectional study
- e.g. survey
- descriptive quantitative questions
What is under level 3 for the evidence hierarchy?
Single in-depth qualitative study
-meaning/process questions
Expert opinion, case reports, etc.
Best evidence refers to research findings that are?
Methodologically appropriate, rigorous, and clinically relevant for answering pressing questions
EBP Challenges: Research Related Barriers
Scarcity of strong research evidence, the info you need sometimes doesn’t exist
Limited availability of strong research evidence for some practice areas. The need for research that directly addresses pressing clinical problems and for replicating studies in a range of settings remains a challenge.
Most studies are in English (barrier for non-English speaking countries)
EBP Challenges: Nurse Related Barriers
Some nurses don’t recognize research articles when they need to, recognizing that there is a problem and that nursing can do something about the problem, nurses being able to scale down the problem to something that is manageable.
The biggest barrier!
-partly b/c of attitude, most people don’t have a desire to do research
EBP Challenges: Organizational Barriers
Lack of funding, lack of release time (do it on your own or it doesn’t get done), time to evaluate the evidence, time to research
Primary Studies
Published in journals and are not pre-appraised for quality and use in practice.
Preprocessed (pre-appraised) evidence
Evidence that has been selected from primary studies and evaluated for use by clinicians
Pre-appraised Research: Systematic Reviews
Methodical, scholarly inquiry.
Narrative (qualitative) form integration merges and synthesizes findings
Evidence about a topic in a rigorous, systematic way
- meta-analyses: integrating quantitative research findings statistically
- meta-syntheses: qualitative studies; less about reducing info and more about interpreting it
Pre-Appraised Research: Clinical Practice Guidelines
Give specific recommendations for evidence-based decision making
-often based on systematic reviews
Meta-Analysis
Technique for integrating quantitative research findings statistically
Use statistics to combine findings from different studies
-NUMBERS