Unit 1 Flashcards
What is the order of importance for the sources of knowledge for science?
- Observation
- Logic
- Intuition
- Authority
Psychological research aims to understand, explain, and predict behavior/thought through _______________.
observation
States that things have systematic causes and science looks for relationships between things.
Determinism
Refers to the fact that we interpret things in causal terms.
Natural Bias
States that empirical evidence drives theories and conclusions.
Empiricism
According to empiricism, theories are (and should be) revised based on _____________.
observations
Science values __________ observation.
objective
___________ observation is affected by personal experiences, opinions, etc.
Subjective
____________ observation is NOT influenced by personal experiences, feelings, etc.
Objective
Complete objectivity is not possible, but researchers strive to eliminate __________ and account for them when reporting.
biases
States that good theories are testable and can potentially be proven wrong.
Testability/Falsifiability
In order for a theory to be testable it must be ____________.
measurable
According to ___________, a good theory has fewer assumptions and uses simplicity to explain a concept.
Parsimony
The study of how people change physically, emotionally/socially, and cognitively through observation.
Developmental Research
Scientists are critical of ___________ and blind acceptance of ____________.
intuition, authority
Scientists evaluate ideas on the basis of __________ and results from scientific investigations.
logic
Scientists conduct ___________ investigations.
naturalistic
Scientific knowledge is _______, meaning there is always room for improvement and a possibility that theory is false.
tentative
__________ are the facts, and __________ are how we interpret the facts.
Observations, inferences
Refers to the fact that people tend to highlight evidence that supports their beliefs and ignore alternatives.
Confirmation Bias
During hypothesis testing, ___________ is used to formulate general statements on specific incidents.
Induction
Searching for confirmation to prove ourselves right
Positive Test Bias
Definition of a theoretical construct or concept stated in concrete/observable terms.
Operational Definition
________ should be clear, objective, practical, and repeatable.
Measurement
Event, situation, or behavior that varies
variables
What are the three main kinds of variables?
IV, DV, Subject
Variables that researchers control
Independent variables
The responses of behaviors of individuals
Dependent or outcome variables
The individual differences in participants
subject variables
Categories cannot be arranged in any order from least to greatest
Nominal scale
Categories have a quantitative meaning, but spacing is consistent.
Ordinal scale
The spacing between values is proportional but there is no true zero
interval scale
an interval scale with a true zero point
ratio scale
Statistical analyses are chosen depending on the kind of ________.
scale
Different participants for each level of IV
Between-Subjects Design
Same participants do both levels of IV
Within-Subject Design
Differences in the scores on the DV
Variance
Differences in the DV that are caused by the IV in the study
Primary variance
Differences in the DV that are caused by anything else
Secondary Variance
A variable that is systematically related to both the IV and DV; impairs ability to establish causal explanation between variables of interest
Confounding Variable
Observe the same individual as they develop
Longitudinal study
Observe individuals who are different ages to compare age groups
Cross sectional study
Losing participants during the study
Selective dropout (attrition)
Study people who are the same age at different points in “history”
time-lag design
Selecting participants for a research study
Sampling
All individuals in a population have an equal probability of being sample
Simple random sample
Divide population into strata and random sample within each group
Stratified random sample
Convenience sampling does not specify the probability that any member of the population will be in the sample
nonprobability sampling
Most common sampling method
convenience sample
Has a study demonstrated what it claims to demonstrate?
Validity
Are the measures consistent/repeatable?
Reliability
Take measures two times and receive very similar scores
Test-retest reliability
a correlation coefficient that ranges from 0.00-1.00
Reliability coefficient
Can you obtain same results form a different (but comparable) sample and do the observations hold up when you change characteristics of the sample?
replication
Do the items correlate with one another?
Internal consistency
Do the items correlate highly with one another?
internal consistency
Tests whether all items correlate to determine if items correlate
Cronbach’s Alpha
If you divide the items in half, scores on each half should correlate with one another
Split-half reliability
The agreement of observations made by two or more raters
Inter-rater reliability
Used to determine inter-rater reliability
Cohen’s Kappa
Reliability is a ___________ but not sufficient condition for validity.
necessary
Can I infer the IV is really related to the DV?
Internal validity
Do the findings generalize beyond this particular study?
External validity
Real-world meaningfulness; measure may work well across studies and participants, but is it true to “real life”?
Ecological validity
Does the measurement (or manipulation) of the variable accurately reflect the underlying theoretical construct?
Construct validity
A variable not directly observable
Construct
Assignment of non-equivalent participants to groups being compared
selection bias
Systematic loss of participants
Selective drop-out
Effects of taking a test on performance on later test
practice effects
unintended changes in experimenters, observers, measuring instruments
instrumentation
Tendency of initially extreme scores to move toward the group mean upon retesting
Regression Toward the Mean
Behavior/results affected by being “watched”
Reactivity (Hawthorne Effect)
Study encourages participants to behave in a certain way
Demand characteristics
Participants try to confirm hypothesis of study
Participants Expectancies
Participants try to go against perceived demand characteristics
Participant Reactance
In 1947, the ______________ was adopted that introduced 10 principles, most notably voluntary consent.
Nuremberg Code
First unified effort of the medical community adopted in 1964 that contributed informed consent
Declaration of Helsinki
A result of the Tuskegee Syphilis study that led to the IRB
Belmont Report
An independent entity that reviews proposed research for compliance with ethical standards (review, regulate, and enforce research ethics)
Institutional Review Board (IRB)
For psychological research, the American Psychological Association (APA) publishes and updates the ______________
APA Ethics Code
What are the 3 basic principles of ethical principles?
Respect for persons, beneficence, justice
Individuals should be treated as autonomous agents and persons with diminished autonomy are entitled to protection
Respect for Persons
capable of deliberation about personal goals
autonomous
Making an effort to secure the well-being of participants by not harming them and maximizing benefits and minimizing harm
Beneficence
Fair distributions of benefits and burdens of research
Jusice
Examined how far people would go in obeying an authority figure, even when it conflicted with their consciences
Milgrim’s Study
Not forced, coerced, or induced to participate, continue, or complete study
Voluntary consent
Some lack of or diminished choice as a requisite to something else not directly related
forced
unfairly persuaded; usually caused by imbalanced of power
coerced
influenced based on the circumstances; often monetary or other study benefits
induced
Potential participants should be told about the purpose of the study, risks and benefits of participation, and their rights to refuse or terminate participation
informed consent
Not including all the information about the study in the description beforehand
Incomplete Disclosure
Actively saying the study is about something else
deception
Period after study during which purpose (or real purpose) is fully explained to participants
Debriefing
Some diminished capacity to give informed consent or at greater than average personal risk
Vulnerable
Verbal or written agreement to do the study
assent
Participant identity is not connected with date when reported (impossible to tell who it came from)
anonymity
participant identity and data never shared outside of the research team (e.g., intelligence scores, grades, mental illness)
confidentiality