UNIT 1 Flashcards

Content related to unit 1: definitions, terminology

1
Q

a system of systems made up of four modules that are
interrelated (since one of them takes the output of another module as its input and develops
its own output). At the same time, each of these modules or component subsystems are
made up of linguistic units that work systematically and are interdependent of each other.

A

Language

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

The property of language that implies that all languages are divided into
component subsystems or modules which are phonology, morphology, syntax and semantics.

A

Modularity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

a property of language that implies that all languages are organized into constituents, which are syntactic units that have a syntactic function such as words or phrases

A

Constituency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

the property of language that implies that all grammatical processes can be applied repeatedly or recursively in order to produce an infinite variety of sentences or to form complex words.

A

Recursion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

The property of language that allows speakers to recognize different units in a language, such as speech sounds, morphemes, words, etc

A

Discreteness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

The property of language that allows speakers to coin new words in order to meet the speaker’s changing communicative needs

A

Productivity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

The property of language that describes the unnatural relation between a
signifier (a sound pattern) and a signified (a concept).

A

Arbitrariness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

A property that derives from arbitrariness: since there’s no natural relation between signifier and signified, the same sequence of sounds can represent different concepts (homonyms) in the same language:

eg: right; write

A

Duality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

The property of language that helps speakers to interpret the
meaning of entire utterances. The meaning of a sentence not only depends on what it
expresses, but also on the situation in which it is uttered.

A

Reliance on context

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

The property of language that allows/implies that speakers can communicate far more than the semantic content of words.

Linguistic systems have linguistic variables, that is, at least two or more realizations (variants of the variable)

A

Variability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

According to O’Grady, the ability that allows speakers to produce and interpret
grammatical sentences. It includes the knowledge of meaning signified by different
sound sequences and how to combine those units of meaning into words, phrases and
sentences.

A

Grammatical competence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

According to O’Grady, the ability to use grammatical knowledge to accomplish a wide range of communicative jobs appropriately to the purpose and the context in hand.

A

Communicative competence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

The speaker’s innate ability to produce and understand an unlimited
number of utterances and to recognize utterances that are not acceptable/ grammatical in their
language. We develop this ability as we grow, since it is partly innate, a built-in capacity, and partly acquired.

A

Linguistic competence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

the mental system that allows humans to form and interpret the sounds, words, and
sentences of their language. It is an intrinsic system of knowledge that encompasses sound and
meaning (articulation and perception of speech sounds) as well as form and structure (formation of words and sentences)

A

Grammar

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

[Characteristics/Qualities of all languages]

All languages have a grammar, since they all must have a complex system that
encompasses sound and meaning, as well as form and structure. Although languages/grammars differ from one another, they all have a grammar

A

Generality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

[Characteristics/Qualities of all languages]

All grammars are alike in basic ways, as there are principles and properties shared by all human languages (eg: more consonant than vowel sounds, constrains on how words can be put together to form a sentence, etc)

A

Universality

17
Q

[Characteristics/Qualities of all languages]

The grammars of all languages are constantly changing. Some changes are minor and occur very quickly, like the coining of words, while others take place over a long period of time and have more dramatic effects on the language.

A

Mutability

18
Q

[Characteristics/Qualities of all languages]

There are no bad or good grammars, all grammars are equal and do essentially the same thing: to tell speakers how to form and interpret words and sentences in their languages.

A

Parity

19
Q

[Characteristics/Qualities of all languages]

The feature of language that describes the subconscious characteristic of human knowledge about grammar, which is inaccessible to introspection

A

Inaccessibility

20
Q

Father of modern linguistics and structuralism. He studied the language synchronically.

A

Saussure

21
Q

An abstract grammatical system that exists in the brains of a group of individuals. It is
collective because it exists within a community and establishes social bonds. An individual is
powerless to create it or modify it. The system exists only in virtue of a kind of contract agreed by the
members of a community. It is homogeneous and stable because the link between sound patterns
and the concept remains constant in the system. And it is a product passively assimilated by speakers of
a language, it is not a function of the speaker.

A

Langue

22
Q

It is concrete as it is the actual realization of the abstract grammatical system (langue). It is
individual as every speaker realizes language differently, speech is always individual. It is accessory
because langue can exist without it. It is heterogeneous because we make choices when
communicating and is active since it is an actual and concrete function of a speaker, an individual act of the will.

A

Parole

23
Q

It is a two-sided psychological entity where there are two elements involved, a concept and a sound pattern. They are both psychological and connected in our brains by an associative link. Each triggers the other and without one, the other cannot exist.

A

linguistic sign

24
Q

a concept/signification/mental representation

A

signified

25
Q

a sound pattern/ acoustic image/ sound image

A

signifier

26
Q

[Principles of the linguistic sign]

There is no logical relation between concept and sound pattern. Therefore, each linguistic
sign is a social convention. This is demonstrated by differences in languages because the
same concept is represented by different sound patterns. But that does not mean that a signal
is of free choice of the speaker.

A

Arbitrariness

27
Q

[Principles of the linguistic sign]

The linguistic sign, being auditory in nature, has a temporal aspect and certain
temporal characteristics:
i) it occupies a temporal space; and
ii) this space is measured in just one dimension: is a line (two signs cannot occur at the
same time, one after the other, forming a chain)

A

Linear

28
Q

It arises from opposition between signs. The conceptual aspect (signified) of the sign is
determined by what exists outside of it. The material aspect (signifier) is the concrete representation
of the signified by means of a sound pattern.

A

Value

29
Q

The association a linguistic unit has with the other elements
present in the same sequence (its context). Relation held in ‘praesentia as it occurs at the surface
structure/as it occurs between the elements in the same sentence.

A

Syntagmatic relation

30
Q

It refers to the words that could replace a linguistic sign in the same context. Relation held in ab’sentia as it occurs in the mind of the speaker and not in the context of the sentence.

A
31
Q

It studies language from a particular point in history. Linguists that adopt
this approach do not observe the evolution or the changes undergone by the language, but they
study how language was used in a particular time and the relations between things that coexist.

A

Synchronic approach

32
Q

It refers to the historical perspective of language. It refers to the study of language done within a period of time to observe its evolution.

A

Diachronic approach

33
Q

Theories that state that language shapes thought and how we create or perceive reality.

A

Mould theories

34
Q

Strongest version of the Sapir-Worph Hypothesis (SWH). It holds that language entirely determines thought)

A

Linguistic determinism

35
Q

Weak version of the Sapir-Worph Hypothesis (SWH); it holds that language may influence, rather than determine, the way speakers perform certain cognitive processes)

A

Linguistic relativity

36
Q

Theory: thought can exist without the need of language imposing restrictions. A
thought can be expressed in a variety of ways, so language works as a sort of clothing for thought
(that already exists). (Language does not mould or shapes our thoughts because they already exist).

Chomsky and Pinker support this theory.

A

Cloak theories