Unit 1 Flashcards
Francis Bacon
Sets the foundation for an empirical philosophy of science by separating scientific knowledge from belief.
Francis Bacon influences Skinner
- Study nature, not books
- Knowledge is power
- Nature to be commanded must be obeyed
- A better world is possible, but it will not come about by accident.
Darwin
Origin of Species describes a theory of evolution. Removes the notion of purpose and intention for understanding changing forms in living creatures
Ernst Mach- Science of Mechanics
Promotes positivism, focus on measurable events as the basis for meaningful knowledge. Cause and effect are best understood as functional relationships, not push-pull mechanical processes.
Pavlov- The Conditioned Reflex
Stimulus-response (respondent) conditioning in his salivary studies of conditioning in dogs
Skinner box
Operant conditioning chamber used for the study of the behavior of individual organisms.
Behavior of Organisms (1938)
Skinner’s seminal studies in operant conditioning, establishing the principles of experimental analysis of behavior
Project Pigeon (1944)
Skinner funded to develop an animal guidance system for air to ground missiles, discriminated key peck responding by pigeons. Use shaping and differential reinforcement.
“The Operational Analysis of Psychological Terms” (1945)
Skinner extends the scope of behavior analysis with his theory of RADICAL BEHAVIORISM (the conceptual analysis of private events).
Walden Two (1948)
Skinner follows Bacon and creates a fictional utopian society based on a science and technology of human behavior.
Principles of Psychology (1950)- Keller & Schoenfeld
Fred Keller and William Schoenfeld publish psychology text featuring the principles of operant and respondent conditioning.
Science and Human Behavior (1953)
Skinner writes a comprehensive behavior analytic account of human behavior, public and private, individual, social and cultural. Most complete statement by Skinner and most influential.
Programmed Instruction
Skinner developed an instructional system for classroom education. Teaching machine and programmed instruction, following a visit to his daughter’s school.
Verbal Behavior (1957)
Skinner publishes a behavior analytic interpretation of language. May be most important theoretical contribution
JEAB (1958)
First scientific journal publishing exclusively operant research.
Division 25 of the APA
Division of experimental analysis of behavior and behavior analysis.
Chomsky
Highly critical review of Verbal Behavior and promoted his own linguistic theory
Skinner and Lindsley- Schedules of Reinforcement
In 1956, Skinner met Ogden Lindsley and they established a human operant research laboratory.
The following year, Skinner and Charles Ferster published a compendium of basic research titled
Schedules of Reinforcement.
Jack Michael
Jack Michael (one of the first people to apply the principles of behavior to changing
human behavior and refined and expanded the concepts of verbal behavior and
motivating operations)
Baer, Wolf and Risley
Donald Baer, Mont Wolf, and Todd Risley (who applied the basic principles to change
the behavior of children with different problem behavior and published the seminal
article “Some Current Dimensions of Applied Behavior Analysis”),
Ivar Lovaas
Ivar Lovaas (who’s contributions in the area early intensive behavioral intervention have inspired countless of practitioners)
JABA (1968)
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
Mark Sundberg
Analysis of Verbal Behavior (journal founded in 1982)
Automatic shaping
Automatic shaping occurs when changes in behavior are brought about by a progressive change in response-stimulus contingencies, which are not arranged by others.
E.g., learning to juggle oranges.
Shaping
Shaping is the reinforcement of successively closer approximations to a target response by a gradually shifting program of contingencies. – The shaping of lever-pressing. – Exceptionally forceful lever pressing. – Delayed lever pressing (key-pecking).
Automatic Shaping and Automatic Reinforcement
The concept of “automatic shaping” is an
extension of the more familiar concept of
“automatic reinforcement.”
Automatic Reinforcement- controversial term
The term is controversial:
– It suggests a special kind of reinforcer
– It is sometimes used as a cover for ignorance, when we can’t identify any reinforcers for a behavior.
– It can be used in a circular way:
• Why did he do X? It was automatically reinforced.
• How do you know? The behavior occurred in strength.
1 of 3 ways for automatic reinforcement
In the first case, behavior produces changes in the environment outside of the skin, and it is these non-social environmental changes that reinforce behavior. An example of this type of automatic reinforcement occurs when you become more proficient at solving a puzzle or typing on your computer.
2 of 3 ways for automatic reinforcement
A second case in which automatic reinforcement occurs, is when the sensory stimulation
produced by the behavior itself functions as a reinforcer. For example, when we rock back and
forth, the kinesthetic stimulation produced by this behavior can reinforce the rocking.
3 of 3 ways for automatic reinforcement
A third case of automatic reinforcement can occur when behavior resembles (“matches”) the
behavior of others. This is what we call “achieving parity.” For example, when our wording or
sentences resemble those used by a verbal community, these similarities will reinforce our
verbal behavior.
Chomsky’s Theory of Language
According to Chomsky, language is innate. Our ability to learn and use grammar is embedded in our brains, in a “language acquisition device”.
This view is language is called Nativism. To support this view, nativists point out that parents tend to correct errors of fact, but not the grammatical errors of their children. Regardless of this, children learn to speak with appropriate grammar despite the lack of direct teaching (see Brown & Hanlon; Möerk; Pinker, S. 1994; Gordon, P., 1985).
Behaviorist’s approach to language acquisition
Language is operant behavior that is learned and is sensitive to its consequences. Evidence of this is provided by Palmer’s study, in which the verbal behavior of children changed as a function of the verbal behavior that was modeled in the absence of consequences for correct or incorrect uses of grammar.
Automatic reinforcement and language acquisition
1) Unconditioned Automatic reinforcement: rhyme, prosody, alliteration
2) Conditioned reinforcement: Speech sounds paired with unconditioned reinforces become conditioned reinforcers
3) Evocative effects of our own verbal behavior (when coming up with composition)
4) Automatic reinforcement by achieving parity with verbal community