Understanding the physical impacts of natural hazards Flashcards

1
Q

Disaster effects

A
  • Total damage and losses
  • Damage - monetary value of assets
  • Losses - goods and services (onset to recovery)
  • Damage generally > losses
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Disaster impacts

A
  • Outcome of total effects of disaster on post disaster environments (physical, economic, social…)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Impact assessment at community level

A

1 – Informing decision making at the local level
2 – Target specific areas of communities
3 – Previous assessments form a basis for projection of likely future impacts
(Lindell and Prater, 2003)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

The world bank considers disaster effects to be

A

A combination of total damage and total loss caused by an extreme event (Government of Bangladesh, 2008).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Impacts of a disaster are

A

The outcomes of the total effects of disaster on the post-disaster physical, economic, social , health and other environments (Paul, 2011)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Damage is defined as

A

the monetary value of fully or partially destroyed physical assets (Paul, 2011)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

DLNA

A

In the aftermath os a major disaster, governments of affected countries generally request the world bank and other organisations to participate in damage, loss and needs assessments (DLNA) (Paul, 2011)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

EM-DAT

A

the Centre for Research on the epidemiology of Disasters (CRED) have developed the Emergency events database (EM-DAT) which records disasters and deaths arising from disasters

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Developing countries accounted for how many deaths due to disasters

A

They accounted for 90% of the deaths caused by natural disasters during the 2000-2009 decade (IFRC and RCS, 2010)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Disaster mortality within a country

A

Borden and Cutter (2008) reported that the areas of the US more prone to deaths from natural disasters in the period 1970-2004 are the South and Intermountain West.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Magnitude does not determined total number of deaths

A

Cyclone Sidr category IV storm killed 3406 people in Bangladesh in 2007. Despite being similar severity, Sidr claimed fewer lives than Cyclone Gorky which struck in 1991 killing 140,000 people (Paul, 2009)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Deaths caused by disasters are not only depend on physical characteristics but also a function of

A

The complex social, economic, demographic, political and cultural values (Paul, 2011)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Gender more likely to die from disasters

A

Fothergill (1998), in a synthesis of over 100 people on natural disasters, concluded that women are more likely to die from natural disasters, than are men.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Direct impacts are

A

Those caused by the physical contact of the extreme natural event with humans and/or with property (Paul, 2011)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

First order impacts

A

Include deaths, injuries caused by directly having physical contact between humans and the event (Paul, 2011)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Indirect impacts

A

Those caused by the consequences of physical contact of disasters with people and/or their property (Paul, 2011)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Second order impacts are

A

Less easily connected to the event and may manifest much later (Smith, 1992)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Tangible impacts are

A

Those that cannot be measured in monetary terms (Paul, 2011)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Intangible impacts are

A

Those either that cannot be expressed in financial term or for which monetary estimates are considered undesirable and unacceptable, such as loss of human life (Tohin and Matiz, 1997)

20
Q

Hurricane Katrina Social impacts

A

Students from impacted areas had to attend schools located in non impacted areas. Many of these students seem to have lost their ability to concentrate on assignments and manifested symptoms of depression (Picou and Marshall, 2007)

21
Q

Suicide rate in US after floods

A

Krug et al (1998) concluded that suicide rates in the US increased in the four years after floods by 13.8%, in 2 years after hurricanes by 31% and by 62.9% in the first year after earthquakes

22
Q

Damage to infrastrucure can lead to

A

Facilities such as hospitals and medical clinics being damaged meaning a lack of proper medical attention which prolongs suffering and increases probability of death (Paul et al, 2011)

23
Q

Damage to roads and building can lead to

A

serious delays in the provision of emergency and regular medical supplies and personnel for treating injuries (Kini et al, 2002)

24
Q

Reconstruction positives

A

Reconstruction following a disaster decreases, to a degree, future hazard risk by destroying weak and old buildings, strengthening new ones and rebuilding in hazard prone areas (Paul, 2011)

25
Q

Reconstruction phase - Parker et al (1997)

A

The reconstruction phase presents a host of new opportunities for governments, communities and individuals to avoid re-indulging the condition that led to disaster in the first place.

26
Q

Economy of Florida following hurricane Charley

A

Economists expected that the 2004 Hurricane Charley would boost the economy of Florida in the next few years as the rebuilding after effect added workers to an already bustled area.

27
Q

Barsotti et al (2010) undertook

A

A quantitative hazard assessment to determine the potential impacts of volcanic tephra fall on human health and infrastructure in the vicinity of Mt Etna

28
Q

Barsotti et al (201o) used

A

VOL-CALPUFF numerical model to explore the dynamics of long lasting weak plume eruptions and their effects on surrounding regions

29
Q

Barsotti et al (2010) found

A

Results show how the lows and infrastructure are more significantly exposed to ash-related hazards than those on the west side in accordance with wind stats

30
Q

Biass et al (2013) undertook

A

GIS based methodology to produce qualitative to semi qualitative risk assessments for tephra fallout around explosive volcanoes designed to operate with datasets of variable precision and resolution depending on data avilability

31
Q

Biass et al (2013) Results

A

Show that an eruption of moderate magntiude (VEI 4) would result in the possible collapse of around 9000 homes in two parishes located close to the volcano (Catopaxi volcano)

32
Q

Gislason et al (2011) undertook

A

Using nanotechnologies, custom designed for studying natural materials, explored the physical and chemical nature of ash deposited when meltwater from Eyjafjallajokull mixed with hot magma, to see if the health and safety concerns were justified

33
Q

Gislason et al (2011) found that

A

the particles of explosive ash that reached Europe were especially sharp and abrasive.

34
Q

Baxter et al (2005) investigated

A

The impacts on buildings of 3 pyroclastic surges that struck three separate villages on 25 June, 21 September and 26 December 1997 during the course of the andesitic dome building following the eruption of the Soufriere Hills volcano, Montserrat

35
Q

Baxter et al (2005) characteristics of the PDC

A

Lateral loading and directionality of the current, the impacts corresponded to the dynamic pressure of the PDC, with a relatively slow rate of rise and without the peak overpressure or a shock front associated with explosive blast; and the entrainment of missiles and ground materials which greatly added to the destructiveness of the PDC.

36
Q

Baxter et al (2005) vulnerability of buildings

A

lay in the openings, mainly windows, which allowed the current to enter the building envelope and in the flammable contents, as well as lack of resistance to the intense heat and dynamic pressure of some building

37
Q

Baxter et al (2005) main hazard characteristics were consistent with

A

Those described by other authors studying Pelee (1902) and St Helens (1980)

38
Q

Saucedo et al (2005) eruption of Colima volcano consisted of

A

Three eruptive phases that produced a complex sequence of tephra fall, pyroclastic surges and pyroclastic flows

39
Q

Saucedo et al (2005) reconstruction of flows

A

In order to reconstruct the paths, velocities, and extents of the pyroclastic dlows, a series of computer simulations were conducted using the program FLOW3D. These areas were traced according to the degree of hazard and pyroclastic flow type recurrence through time.

40
Q

Saucedo et al (2005) found

A

Today, an eruption of the same magnitude as 1913 would affect about 15,000 inhabitants of small villages, ranches and towns located within 15km south of the volcano.

41
Q

Harris et al (2011) produced

A
using a lava flow emplacement model and a satellite-based land cover classification, a map to allow assessment of the type and quantity of natural, agricultural and urban land cover at risk from lava flow invasion. 
First producing lava flow contours and then these contours are projected onto a land classification map to assess type and amount of each land cover class falling within each contour.
42
Q

Harris et al (2011) found

A

that the maps are designed to provide a quick lookup capability to assess the type of land at risk - from our first vent zone case we find a total area of around 680km squared at risk.

43
Q

Papanthanassiou and Valkaniotis (2009) - region studied

A

Town of Edessa, which is characterized as a low seismicity zone due to few moderate events of M

44
Q

Papanthanassiou and Valkaniotis (2009) - aim

A

Evaluate site amplification due to geological conditions and to assess the liquefaction hazard.

45
Q

Papanthanassiou and Valkaniotis (2009) - methods

A

1-D site response analyses performed with data collected from borings with standard penetration tests. After this the liquefaction potential of the subsoil layers was evaluated initially estimating the liquefaction potential index of the soil columns using parameters provided by SPT.

46
Q

Papanthanassiou and Valkaniotis (2009) - results

A

Liquefaction induced ground disruptions are likely to occur at the center of the city, only when the amplified values of acceleration are taken into account to the computation of liquefaction potential