Hazard type and risk communication Flashcards
Psychological approach to risk communication
- Focus on the individual
- Draws on traditional ‘scientific method’
- Quantitative methods
- Objectification
Intervention strategies
The model proposed has implications for conceptualising and implementing risk reduction strategies. The model implies that they should mirror the developmental process described here: motivating people to prepare, facilitating the formation of intentions, and then promoting conversion of intentions to preparedness (Patron, 2013)
Problems with conventional approaches (psychological) -
- ‘Constructed’ science;
- politics and science → placing science into a wider social context, not dismissing science
- de-constructing rationality and expertisation
Socio-cultural approaches
- Focus on social and cultural construction of issues
- Subjectivity accepted
- Qualitatively assessed.
Challenging the objectiveness of science
“This somewhat heterogenous body of work has challenged the self-image of science as an epistemologically objective and value-free study of the self evident facts of a real and ontologically objective world” (Demerrit, 2001)
Assumptions made by the scientific community
“Many of these assumptions are informal and negotiated by relatively small communities of investigators. Others are not formally acknowleged because they emerge out of the interactions of scientists within a wider epistemic community of research scientists and policy makers” (Demeritt, 2001a)
Nudge Approach
“using the new sciences of choice from psychology, economics and neurosciences – as well as appealing to an improved understanding of decision making and behavior change – a libertatian paternalist mode of governing is being promoted in the UK (2011)
‘deficit’ approaches
Owens (2000) characterizes ‘deficit’ approaches thus “lay people are ignorant of environmental science and irrational in their response to risks: the public must be engaged in order to be better informed and converted to a ‘more objective’ view”
New agendas in the social sciences emerging from STS (Whatmore, 2009)
- Tackling epistemic hegemony
- Exploring and challenging knowledge hierarchies
- Challenging conventional scientific methods
- Understanding publics
Whatmore, 2009 - public science as a public good
“…the answer to the question of what makes public science a more effective public good resides not in its subservience to governmental or commercial agendas…This places the onus on diversifying the publics with whom scientists collaborate on matters that concern them, and on the terms on which they do so. It should also…involve redistributions of environmental expertise in which the inventiveness of social scientists comes to the fore in the design and conduct of research practices that stage more and different opportunities for new knowledge politics to emerge” (Whatmore, 2009)
Demeritt (2001) - describes the scientific construction of climate change as
a global scale environmental problem, whose reductionist formulation serves a variety of political purposes but instrumental and instrumental and interest based critiques of the use of scientific knowledge tend to ignore the ways which politics gets into science at the upstream end
Demeritt (2001) - science link with politics
Science has been imagied as indpendent of the political parties and feeding information into it.
Demeritt (2001) - cultural politics of science
Very little attention has been paid to the cultural politics of scientific practice and its consequential role in framing and constructing for us the problem of global warming.
Demeritt (2001) - right wing critics have tried
to refute scientific knowledge of global warming as socially constructed and publically based balderdash
Beck (1992)
The dependence upon science to make tangible otherwise invisible environmental risks is characteristic of a modern risk society.