Frameworks for managing risk Flashcards
Neo-liberalism
“Neo-liberalism reactivates liberal principals: skepticism over the capacities of political authorities to govern everything for the best; vigiliance over the attempts of political authorities to seek to govern. Its language is familiar and needs little rehearsal. Markets are to replace planning as regulators of economic activity. Those aspects of government that welfare construed as political responsibilities are, as far as possible, to be transformed into commodified forms and regulated according to market principles (Rose and Miller: 1992)
Characteristics of liberal problematics
“The characteristics of liberal problematics of government are…dependent upon technologies for ‘governing at a distance’, seeking to create locales, entities and persons able to operate a regulated autonomy” (Rose and Miller, 1992)
Three different types of governance frameworks
Directive, devolved, collaborative
2 different paradigms of risk management
Hard, controlling, engineered, physical Soft, managed, socio-political and cultural (McEntire, 2005)
Pearce, 2003
“Historically, disaster management planning in North America has been viewed from a para-military perspective… that is, it ha been conducted for, not with, the community” (Pearce, 2003)
Disaster resistant community model
Has been defined as a “means to assist communities in minimising their vulnerability to natural hazards by maximising the application of the principles and techniques of mitigation to their development and/or redevelopment decision-making process” (Geis, 2000)
Disaster resistant community models activities
With increasing losses resulting from natural disasters in recent decades, it has been apparent that emergency measures much include more proactive measures. such as hazard and vulnerability analyses, pre-zoning methods, land use planning etc
Disaster resilient communities
Commonly related to social factors pertaining to recovery. Paton et al (2000) indicates that resilient comprises three components: dispositional cognitive and environmental.
The concept of resilience possesses three key strengths
First, the most common use of the term does not assume that disaster prevention is always possible. A second strength is it captures the social variables that are neglected by the disaster-resistant community concept. Lastly, the disaster resilient community may include other disciplines.
Disaster resistant community concerns
Physically-based, expert-led, excludes socio-political power relationships.
Disaster resilient community concerns
Reactive in nature, can imply a ‘return to normal’ and thus an increase in vulnerability, contested understandings of the term
Management cycles
Sustainable development and sustainable hazards mitigation
Long-term, developmental, social equity perspective
Acknowledge relationships between physical and social systems
Concerns of sustainable develpopment and suatainable hazards mitigation
process-led, but often fails to be reactive. Value-laden concept and therefore partly exclusionary
Inclusive risk management
“our goal for change in emergency management should be based on as much inclusion and consensus as is realistically feasible…[w]e must base our scholarship and policies on a view of vulnerability that suggests the need to: assess liabilities and capabilities; reduce risk and susceptibility; and raise resistance and resilience to disaster”
McEntire (2005)