Ubuntu Moral Theory Flashcards
why African ethics?
we can start from the plausibility of an “African Moral Weltanschauung”as reason for why ethicists would want to study ethics exclusively
What is an African Weltanschauung?
-how African people cognitively relate to African cultural beliefs, social institutions, other African people, practices and moral values
-an African way of life defined through experiencing the world primarily through African culture and community
-aspect of social reality shaped differently for Africans as it is for European or Asian people
what are the claims made by Kwame Gyekye when speaking of an African Ethics?
he asserts that Africa has its own Moral Worldview:
-there are many common trends in the moral traditions and moral practices of African people
-there is a possibility that they can be synthesized or prominently held enough to be considered unified and representative of an African morality
what worldview or Weltanschauung would we consider Ubuntu to be?
South African Moral Weltschauung
-from this the commonsense moral beliefs in South Africa can be unified and represented in a moral theory or principle that all South(ern) Africans ought to follow given that it emerges from their moral worldview
what are the common understandings of Ubuntu?
a person is a person through other people
what are the two meanings that Ubuntu can have?
- Metaphysical meaning
- Normative meaning
Metaphysical meaning
Your identity or ontological status as a person is dependent on your community
Normative meaning
one ought to maintain a certain kind of relationship with ones community to be considered a good person
what is problematic about the normative meaning?
The vague normative meaning is insufficient to guide human action, which is why we need a more explicit moral principle of Ubuntu
what is reflective equilibrium?
Reflective Equilibrium is the rational process of matching out background assumptions, considered moral judgments(moral intuitions) and the proposed moral principles.
-we attempt to make these coherent with each other, reworking the elements that need to be revised to achieve coherence between the moral intuitions, the moral principle under consideration and background assumptions about morality
what must be consistent when developing the Ubuntu Moral Principle?
- Considered Judgments
- Moral Principle- the central ethical claim taken to make up Ubuntu/ Proposed Ubuntu Moral Principle
- Background assumptions about morality
Building an Ubuntu Moral Principle
In building the Ubuntu Moral Theory we are developing an UM principle that can account for the moral intuitions and commonly held understanding of Ubuntu, and out background assumptions about morality
what are some of the moral intuitions that Ubuntu has to account for?
what are the 4 attempts at producing an Ubuntu Moral Principle
- An action is right insofar as it promotes the well-being of others without violating the rights of others
- An action is right just insofar as it helps you perfect your nature as a social being
- An action is right insofar as it is aimed at the support of the most vulnerable in the community
- An action is right if it produces harmony and reduces discord in the community and an act is wrong if it fails to develop community
Explain option 1
An action is right insofar as it promotes the well-being of others without violating the rights of others; an action is wrong to the extent that it either violates rights or fails to enhance the welfare of ones fellows without violating rights
critique of option 1
-many duties of communal welfare will conflict with individual rights meaning that duties would trump individual rights
-the focus on well being might be problematic because unanimity, cooperation, tradition, while being morally desirable by people who share the Southern African Weltanschauung, might not be good at maximizing well being
Explain Option 2 for the UMP
An act is right just insofar as it positively relates to others and helps one realize oneself as a social being; an act is wrong if it does not help perfect one nature as a social being
Does this achieve Reflective equilibrium?
no it does not
-this version of Ubuntu suggest that you should help someone because it is good and helps you become a better person through community
- self realization as a motive displaces the importance of being motivated to act for the sake of community which is particularly important
Explain option 3
An act is right in so far that it is in solidarity with vulnerable groups, an act is wrong if it fails to support a vulnerable community
-some consider that we ought to prioritize collective unity to ensure that we care for the most vulnerable in our society
critique of option 3
-this understanding of Ubuntu is too narrow to be an acceptable moral principle (contra Background Assumptions)
-it only says that we should focus on the destitute as opposed to everyone we are in community with
-there is more to morality than ensuring survival
-this will not not account for the moral importance of other values like unanimity, cooperation or tradition
which option does Metz consider to be the most promising formulation of the Ubuntu Moral Principle
Option 4
Option 4
An action is morally right if it produces harmony or togetherness and reduces discord in the community. An action is morally wrong if it fails to develop community
-One ought to act in ways that promote harmony and reduce discord in the community
what type of principle of UMP according to Metz?
-deontological
- it tells us what the moral rule or maxim we ought to act by
what is the Ubuntu Moral Principle
An action is morally right if it promotes harmony or togetherness and reduces discord between people in community
An action is morally wrong if it goes against harmony in the community