Existentialist Ethics Flashcards
what criticisms do Existentialist have against established moral theories?
- Moral theories aim to prescribe to you how to act
- Acting according to a Moral Theory is to act for the wrong reason
3.Moral theories in aiming to be objective are too abstract and lack the actual concreteness to be useful to us in our everyday moral problem solving
1.Moral theories aim to prescribe to you how to act
-the intention of moral theories is to tell you what to do and for you to do what is says
-for Existentialists the problem with this picture is that it removes the responsibility we have over our own actions and our moral decisions
-in this way moral theories undermines the fact that you are the one acting and making the moral decisions
- Acting according to a moral theory is to act for the wrong reason
-if we act in a certain way because a moral theory told us to act in that way, this will amount to acting for the wrong reasons
- we should not do the morally right thing because a moral theory said its right, we should do the morally right thing because we believe it to be right
- Moral theories, in aiming to be objective, are too abstract and lack the actual concreteness to be useful to us in our everyday moral problem solving
-moral theories are useless when we have to act because life is often too complicated to think about moral problems in an abstract and mechanical sense
- a moral theory is too abstract often vague and ill-equipped to deal with the complexities of everyday moral problem solving in the first instance(eg trolley problems)
- when we encounter moral problems that are complex it is not the ethical theories that decisively intervene but our own individual choice of action which we can justify to ourselves that seems to be focal to resolving moral dilemmas we are in
Why according to existentialists is acting from the prescriptions of a moral theory dubious?
-it undermines the role of the individual in determining the course of action in that situation
-dependence on moral theories defer the responsibility we have over ourselves and our actions
-the moral theories also undermine the fact that it is ultimately us who are responsible over our action sand not the moral theory
-moral theory makes us respond mechanistically and formally to complex situations
-it opens us up to people being able to do anything based on principle so long as a moral theory prescribes it
what do existentialist offer?
some existentialists propose an Existentialist Ethics that aim to serve as an alternative to Ordinary Ethics, both in terms of what we ought to do and what kind of individual we ought to be) and can adequately account for personal responsibility
Existentialism
as a philosophy simpliciter is not an ethical theory but on ontological position
- its a philosophical theory particularly interested in grasping what it is to exist as a human being in the world
- concerned with nature of “being” meaning what it is to be something
Key claims of Sartrian existentialism as an ontological theory
- Human existence is defined the the pronouncement of “Existence Precedes Essence”
- En Soi, Pour Soi_ Existence is Care
- Radical Freedom
- Existence precedes Essence
- no given way of being human, human existence is a self making-in-a-situation
- what it means to be human can only come about as a result of existing as a human
- humans do not have a preset function or essence they ought to fulfil in their lives, rather who they are as beings and what kinds of life to live comes from their won existence and the choices they make over their lives
Ethical Implications:
there is no preset way that humans ought to behave or act like. A valuable or worthwhile human life can only be determined by choices expressive of ones existential freedom and living one for yourself
- En Soi, Pour Soi
To exist as a human is not simply to be but for your being to be an issue for you
- to exist for humans is to be for yourself, to determine your own existence and to care about what it is that you want to be and will become, and for this to be who your truly are
Radical Freedom
a persons being is defined by radical freedom
- the authentic person is one who lives in clear, honest recognition of existential freedom
- nothing is pregiven in human existence your combined existence is a matter of your choices regarding how you relate to your situation and determine your existence
Ethical Implication: To live a valuable human life you ought to take these aspects of your existence seriously
what is the ethical approach or ethical position that Existentialist Ethicists infer from Existentialism
There is a moral imperative for all human being to be authentic individuals, where authenticity involves the adequate embrace of your an everyones existential freedom in your actions, endeavours and who you are
Authenticity or the avoidance of ‘‘Bad Faith” is a Sartrian existentialist ethical ideal that we ought to live by
Bad Faith
These are strategies for denying or disguising one’s freedom and responsibility in order to minimize the anxiety which full appreciation of these would induce
ethically:
- bad faith ought to be avoided because it constitutes the denial of ones existential freedom and responsibility. It constitutes the ethically wrong way of relating to our human existence (radical existential freedom)
What elements does Bad Faith consist of?
Bad Faith also involves failing to strike a balance between ones facticity with ones transcendence (overemphasising one or the other)
Bad faith hence involves acting like your life is determined for you and that you have no control or power over yourself and action as well as denying your freedom
Facticity
Brute facts that characterize who we are which we ought to take full responsibility over