UAM Flashcards

1
Q

what must be proved for UAM

A

that D committed an unlawful act which is dangerous on an objective test which causes death. must have MR for UA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

4 elements

A

1) unlawful act
2) dangerous act
3) causing death
4) MR for UA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what case stated that a civil wrong is not enough to create liability

A

Franklin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

in what case was there no unlawful act as V did not fear violence

A

Lamb

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

is an omission enough

A

no, must be an unlawful act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what case stated that wilful neglect could not amount to UAM

A

Lowe

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

is ‘dangerous’ an objective or subjective test

A

objective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what case stated that if a sober + reasonable person would realise the UA may cause some harm then that is sufficient

A

Church

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what case stated that you do not have to foresee a specific type of harm

A

JM & SM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what case confirmed that if D performing an unlawful, dangerous act, likely to injure another + inadvertently causes their death, then guilty

A

Larkin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what case stated that act doesn’t have to be aimed at V

A

Mitchell

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what act states the act can be aimed at property

A

Goodfellow

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what case stated that the circumstances of the burglary could make the act dangerous on an objective test

A

Bristow

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what case stated that risk of harm includes shock but not mere ‘emotional disturbance’

A

Dawson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what case confirmed that where a reasonable person would be aware of V’s fratility + risk of physical harm to V, then he will be guilty

A

Watson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what case confirmed that if D supplied + injected V with drugs then they’ll be guilty

17
Q

what case stated that if V self-injected drugs then the act of self-injection was a voluntary intervening act by V which broke the chain

18
Q

what case stated that not necessary for D to realise the act is unlawful or dangerous

A

Newbury & Jones