ABH (S47) Flashcards

1
Q

define ABH

A

assault occasioning actual bodily harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what section and act does abh come from

A

s47 OAPA 1861

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is the ar for abh

A

common assault that causes actual bodily harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is the mr of abh

A

same as assault/ battery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

explain the ar of abh (definition of assault + battery)

A

D must cause V to apprehend immediate unlawful violence (assault) / apply unlawful force (battery)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what does occasioning mean

A

causes- the common assault causes the harm (normal rules of causation)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what case states that ‘actual’ meant not so trivial as to be wholly insignificant. + ‘harm’ meant injury which goes beyond interference with the health and comfort of the V

A

Chan Fook

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what case states that cutting hair is harm

A

DPP v Smith

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what case states that abh covers physical, psychiatric, clinical conditions but not emotions such as fear, distress or panic

A

Chan Fook

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what case stated that bodily harm includes recognisable phsychiatric illnesses

A

Burstow

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what case states that loss of consciousness, even momentarily is ABH

A

R(T) v DPP

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

explain mr for abh (mr for assault + battery)

A

intentionally or recklessly make v apprehend immediate unlawful violence (assault)/ intentionally or recklessly apply unlawful force

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

which case confirmed Roberts and what did it say

A

Savage v Parmenter - do not have to show D intended to cause or was reckless in causing harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly