GNM Flashcards

1
Q

what is GNM

A

when D owes V a DOC, breaches that duty in a very negligent way causing death of V. Act or omission - doesn’t have to be unlawful

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what case established elements required to prove GNM and what are these (5)

A

adomako:
1) duty of car
2) breach of duty
3) breach causes death
4) gross negligence
5) risk of death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what did court say in Adomako

A

D’s failure to react to the disconnected tube was ‘abysmal’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what did Adomako say in relation to duty of care

A

Lord Mackay - ordinary principles of negligence in civil law apply where a DOC exists + it has been breached

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

in what case did Lord Atkin set out test for negligence in civil cases: D owes DOC to anyone closely + directly affected by his act or omission

A

Donoghue v Stevenson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

DOC can arise in diff. situations. what the relationship in Adomako

A

Doctor and patient

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

in what case did D’s voluntarily undertake DOC + fail in that DOC when they didn’t feed Stone’s sister or summon medical help

A

Stone & Dobinson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

In what case did D owe DOC through tenancy agreement

A

Singh

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

In what case did D owe a DOC due to a contract

A

Litchfield

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what did COA confirm in Wacker

A

that there can be a duty in a criminal case even if not in a civil case, because the V’s were parties to an illegal act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what case confirmed that D can still owe a DOC to V even if D+V are engaged in criminal activity

A

Willoughby

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

in what case was the breach a failure to summon help after an overdose

A

Evans

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what must be proven for causation

A

that D’s BOD was the case of V’s death and that had D exercised proper care the death would not have occurred (if relevant thin skull rule/ medical intervention)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

negligence has to be ‘gross’ and case

A

Bateman: ‘beyond a matter of mere compensation between subjects + showed such disregard for the life + safety of others as to commit a crime against the state + conduct deserving of punishment’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what case confirmed it is for the jury to decide if BOD is serious enough to amount to ‘gross’ negligence

A

Adomako

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

in what case did the jury find D’s decision to sail without safe engines as a backup in bad weather gross negligence

A

Litchfield

17
Q

In which case did the V die following doctors negligence and the court confirmed risk must relate to death not just injury

A

Misra & Srivistava